Warner Home Video | Release Date: July 23, 2004
2.7
USER SCORE
Generally unfavorable reviews based on 282 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
52
Mixed:
23
Negative:
207
WATCH NOW
Stream On
Stream On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
5
oxanaSep 12, 2014
I wasn't paying too much attention on a first watch, so I took another. Didn't help much: the story is good, with nice witty twists, but all too obvious. Plus, in my private tastes, there are too many elements I dislike. Sharon Stone isI wasn't paying too much attention on a first watch, so I took another. Didn't help much: the story is good, with nice witty twists, but all too obvious. Plus, in my private tastes, there are too many elements I dislike. Sharon Stone is great, at least when compared to Halle Berry's performance. It is not always easy to be a star... at least in a movie like this. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
mds03Apr 16, 2013
Why was this movie just in the low standards of mediocre when it could have been pure gold? Don't get me wrong it had it's moments. But barely enough of them. The problems are that it wasn't constantly entertaining and the dialogue was atWhy was this movie just in the low standards of mediocre when it could have been pure gold? Don't get me wrong it had it's moments. But barely enough of them. The problems are that it wasn't constantly entertaining and the dialogue was at times bland and boring. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
MarcK.Jul 23, 2004
Oh my! I saw this movie BEFORE seeing the MetaCritic scores, and couldn't believe how savagely it's been treated! Of course it's not a great picture, but it's really not that bad. The special effects of Halle Berry's Oh my! I saw this movie BEFORE seeing the MetaCritic scores, and couldn't believe how savagely it's been treated! Of course it's not a great picture, but it's really not that bad. The special effects of Halle Berry's "super powers" are unique and fun. How could most of these same critics rate this worse than last year's "Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle". Now THAT was a bad movie! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
FlorenceB.Jul 27, 2004
So the dialogue was laughable, but i thought the overall look of the film was pretty awesome. Despite the bad reviews, this movie was lots of fun, and much bettter than Spiderman 2.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
LoloJ.Jul 29, 2004
Ha once again marvel seems to outshine Dc comics spider man 2 is amazing and just real every one can't relate to him, cat woman was okay becos Ms berry can do no wrong, marvel has proven why they are number one in comics and movies with Ha once again marvel seems to outshine Dc comics spider man 2 is amazing and just real every one can't relate to him, cat woman was okay becos Ms berry can do no wrong, marvel has proven why they are number one in comics and movies with two words being real. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful