Metascore
48

Mixed or average reviews - based on 39 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 39
  2. Negative: 9 out of 39
  1. Reviewed by: Mike Clark
    38
    There are only so many times you can see a slow-motion kickboxing scene or a figure sail off a skyscraper before you want to spend a nice, cozy evening with the Dead Sea Scrolls.
  2. The shreds have vanished in Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle, which runs at that speed during its stunts but is utterly out of gas in every other way.
  3. 30
    A less cohesive action-comedy than its predecessor, Full Throttle is instead a freewheeling collection of random action sequences strung together with little or no discernible rhyme or reason.
  4. That sense of fun is jackhammered into our skulls. The tongue that was so firmly in cheek last time has punctured through muscle and bone.
  5. 30
    Two-hour exercise in chaotic action and coarse, annoyingly coy sexuality.
  6. What fans of the original movie, "Charlie's Angels," which was fun and good-natured, will make of this sloppy mess is hard to guess.
  7. 25
    Something cold and mechanical has seeped into the sequel. The divas push so hard for fun, it kills the spontaneity that fun needs to breathe.
  8. 25
    Isn't a full-bodied comedy, and it isn't a bona fide action movie, either. It just makes a facetious spectacle of itself.
  9. Reviewed by: Glenn Kenny
    12
    As for me, watching this overripe, ignorant parading of Hollywood privilege an hubris put me in mind of a different song--Neil Young's "Revolution Blues." Specifically the bit about Laurel Canyon being filled with famous stars . . .
User Score
5.8

Mixed or average reviews- based on 115 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 39 out of 66
  2. Negative: 23 out of 66
  1. Jan 2, 2013
    1
    A sequel!!! really? so this is in case that you didn't see the first movie because somebody told you that it was bad? don't expect this one toA sequel!!! really? so this is in case that you didn't see the first movie because somebody told you that it was bad? don't expect this one to be any better, this movie it's really embarrassing. Full Review »
  2. matta.
    Sep 20, 2005
    3
    The only decent part of this movie is Crispin Glover's character (although he was criminally underused in this one) and the Irish bad The only decent part of this movie is Crispin Glover's character (although he was criminally underused in this one) and the Irish bad guy. The script was a joke (and they can't use the excuse it was supposed to be that way because that is just a cop-out for shitty writing) and all three Charlie's Angels are extremely annoying, even more-so than they were in the first one (although Lucy Liu is tolerable because she is hot). Anyone who likes intelligent films, or even entertaining ones but with decent acting a good script, then stay away from this crap. Full Review »
  3. Aug 28, 2014
    3
    An even more disappointing follow-up to its predecessor than the predecessor itself. Full Throttle is one of those instances where a sequelAn even more disappointing follow-up to its predecessor than the predecessor itself. Full Throttle is one of those instances where a sequel should have been avoided at all costs. Full Review »