User Score
6.2 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 36 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 36
  2. Negative: 8 out of 36

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. MarcD.
    Apr 3, 2001
    9
    A hell of a lot of fun! I smiled thoughout.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. Nikki
    Jul 9, 2002
    6
    It was entertaining, sure! But it was kinda........cheesy.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. MattP.
    Apr 30, 2003
    3
    Rubbish from start to finish, I had to suffer this round a friends house who when not watching movies flicks between MTV base and Hits:UK, which sayes it all.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. ScottL.
    May 20, 2003
    8
    You people are idiots, this movie was meant to be a mindess fun. It has comedy, hot chicks, and hot chicks kicking some ass.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. ESSE.
    Sep 5, 2004
    10
    Great movie, but its targeted more toward teenage girls than anyone else.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. PaulC.
    Feb 27, 2001
    1
    Friends said it was okay - so I expected too much - terrible.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. MichaelC.
    Feb 3, 2001
    7
    Hot girls, bizarre fun, kick ass moves, awesome cliches. It's got's it faults, but Charlie's Angels can give you lots you want a bit more.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. DerekJ.
    Mar 1, 2001
    10
    Saw this on an airplane - could you do that with Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon? - nuff said!!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. Chick
    May 15, 2001
    10
    Most media reviews of this film are by guys who can't stand to see women in movies who aren't just there for the 'get-your-kit-off-element'. Bags of fun, doesn't take itself seriously at all. Very tongue-in-cheek. GIRL POWER!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. IreneB.
    Aug 19, 2002
    10
    A one-hell of a great movie! it's a stand-out action and comedy masterpiece!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. AveryA.
    Feb 27, 2003
    3
    It sucked!!!!!! You put shame to the televison series!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. PatC.
    Jan 13, 2004
    2
    True to the TV series - not one instant of substance. Murray demonstrates he's not a one-dimensional actor, but that's merely a footnote in a one-dimensional film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. [Anonymous]
    Sep 28, 2002
    3
    Boring and it doesn't make sense, even in its own terms. I like popcorn movies; but this is just bad.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. tt
    Jul 15, 2003
    10
    Awesome sh*t biatch!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. Mar 2, 2011
    2
    This is the type of movie I rent to see with my friends and family so we can make fun of it. Its so bad...its good.
  16. Apr 16, 2011
    6
    It's obvious that this movie isn't trying to be serious and too many people don't get that. It's a decent enough watch, but it's no Grade A film. 6 from me.
  17. Sep 20, 2011
    10
    Charlie's Angels ROCKS! I love the original movie, great cast, although Cameron Diaz sure knows how to do the Soul Train line. For some reason, I like the original TV series starring the late Farrah Fawcett is a sure fire classic. I don't know if I'm going to watch the reboot of the series, but I don't like the new cast at all. It's wrong and nobody wants to see a Charlie's Angels reboot. All we want is a third movie. So please, Sony. Make with the third movie, already. Expand
  18. Aug 15, 2011
    10
    I enjoyed this movie recently. I like action movie! This movie makes me want to see next scene. I recommend you to see this movie if you didn't watch this movie.
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 34 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 34
  2. Negative: 5 out of 34
  1. Too bad the action scenes rarely rise above standard kung-fu comedy, diluting the film's otherwise considerable entertainment value.
  2. 30
    Of course, it's terrible -- but did it have to be this bad?
  3. 50
    The movie's still thinner than a supermodel's waist. It's not just that the results are less than heavenly; it's that we don't know what the hell they are.