- Studio: Columbia Pictures
- Release Date: Nov 3, 2000
User Score
6.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 45 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 29 out of 45
-
Mixed: 6 out of 45
-
Negative: 10 out of 45
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
MarcD.Apr 3, 20019A hell of a lot of fun! I smiled thoughout.
-
-
NikkiJul 9, 20026It was entertaining, sure! But it was kinda........cheesy.
-
-
MattP.Apr 30, 20033Rubbish from start to finish, I had to suffer this round a friends house who when not watching movies flicks between MTV base and Hits:UK, which sayes it all.
-
-
ScottL.May 20, 20038You people are idiots, this movie was meant to be a mindess fun. It has comedy, hot chicks, and hot chicks kicking some ass.
-
-
ESSE.Sep 5, 200410Great movie, but its targeted more toward teenage girls than anyone else.
-
-
PaulC.Feb 27, 20011Friends said it was okay - so I expected too much - terrible.
-
-
MichaelC.Feb 3, 20017Hot girls, bizarre fun, kick ass moves, awesome cliches. It's got's it faults, but Charlie's Angels can give you lots you want a bit more.
-
-
DerekJ.Mar 1, 200110Saw this on an airplane - could you do that with Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon? - nuff said!!!!
-
-
ChickMay 15, 200110Most media reviews of this film are by guys who can't stand to see women in movies who aren't just there for the 'get-your-kit-off-element'. Bags of fun, doesn't take itself seriously at all. Very tongue-in-cheek. GIRL POWER!!
-
-
IreneB.Aug 19, 200210A one-hell of a great movie! it's a stand-out action and comedy masterpiece!
-
-
AveryA.Feb 27, 20033It sucked!!!!!! You put shame to the televison series!
-
-
PatC.Jan 13, 20042True to the TV series - not one instant of substance. Murray demonstrates he's not a one-dimensional actor, but that's merely a footnote in a one-dimensional film.
-
-
[Anonymous]Sep 28, 20023Boring and it doesn't make sense, even in its own terms. I like popcorn movies; but this is just bad.
-
-
ttJul 15, 200310Awesome sh*t biatch!
-
-
Mar 2, 20112This is the type of movie I rent to see with my friends and family so we can make fun of it. Its so bad...its good.
-
Apr 16, 20116It's obvious that this movie isn't trying to be serious and too many people don't get that. It's a decent enough watch, but it's no Grade A film. 6 from me.
-
Sep 20, 201110
-
Aug 15, 201110I enjoyed this movie recently. I like action movie! This movie makes me want to see next scene. I recommend you to see this movie if you didn't watch this movie.
-
Dec 22, 20127Very funny movie with a lot of style.
-
Jan 2, 20131What a bad production, the story is so lame and pointless, the acting performances are a shame, it was disappointing to see Lucy Liu in that stupid character she's better than that. No need to talk about Diaz and Barrymore it is known that they are not good actresses any way. If you want to see what were the real Charley's angels you need to watch the T.V. series.
-
50Too bad the action scenes rarely rise above standard kung-fu comedy, diluting the film's otherwise considerable entertainment value.
-
30Of course, it's terrible -- but did it have to be this bad?
-
50The movie's still thinner than a supermodel's waist. It's not just that the results are less than heavenly; it's that we don't know what the hell they are.