Metascore

Generally favorable reviews - based on 28 Critics What's this?

User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 43 Ratings

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 21 out of 28
  2. Negative: 0 out of 28
  1. The endearingly enduring 1952 E.B. White novel about friendship and salvation, has been turned into a beautifully rendered motion picture that's full of warmth, wit and wonder.
  2. 80
    May not be perfect, but it honors its source and captures the key elements -- the humor and good sense, as well as the sheer narrative exuberance -- that have made White’s book a classic.
  3. 80
    Best of all may be the narration, by Sam Shepard: His voice, the kind of voice God might have if he'd ever smoked Camels, frames this gentle but potent little story with good-natured authority, making it feel modern and ageless at once.
  4. Reviewed by: Angie Errigo
    60
    Cute and sweet, and if it lacks great wit or magic, at least it has the courage to remain faithful to the gentle sadness and 'realism' of the original material.

See all 28 Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 20
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 20
  3. Negative: 4 out of 20
  1. ChristaG.
    10
    OMG (Oh my Gosh!) This movie was great! Wilbur has a great sense of humor and so does Charlotte! She is so caring and loveable for Wilbur! My mom loved it and so did my grandma! Hope you liked it too. Expand
  2. This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It is interesting how children and animals interact and speak together. The casting is very good. For example, Fern is spoken by Julia Roberts. The movie is based on the novel by E.B. White. It is very similar to the movie, only some scenes are different. I found the movie brilliant and thought-provoking because the voices fit to the characters very well. For example, there is a rat in the movie and the voice is very nasty just like him. At the end Charlotte dies, that’s tragic because she and Wilbur were good friends. It’s like when your mother dies. This shows that animals also have feelings. That’s why the movie is so interesting for me. Expand
  3. MarkB.
    7
    One of 2006's more noteworthy cinematic quirks was Michael Winterbottom's amusing stab at filming Laurence Sterne's (The Life and Opinions of) Tristram Shandy, a work that has been catalogued as completely unfilmable even by those who DID get through reading it. (Winterbottom's approach was to make it a spoof halfway between the styles of Christopher Guest and the Zucker brothers; this was probably as valid as any other and certainly more watchable.) E. B. White's masterpiece Charlotte's Web--a bonafide classic that doesn't need the slightly condescending designation 'children's' since it's a great book no matter what the reader's age--is the opposite of Sterne; it's seemingly impossible NOT for anyone to be able to make a decent movie out of it. This was proven in 1973 when Hanna-Barbera Studios, whose Saturday morning cartoon product had by this time plumbed new depths in cheesy animation, sloppy scriptwriting and derivative plot and character work, STILL managed to make a rousing, good-looking and utterly charming film version. (But a lot of H-B's stuff from the previous decade: Yogi Bear, the Flintstones, the Jetsons, Jonny Quest and more, still ranks in the 'very-good-to-near-great' category. Rest in peace, Joe, Ed and Iwao.) The eventually inevitable live-action do-over equals or tops the cartoon in most areas because White's themes are so universal and his foundation so solid, and the vocal performances are so much on the mark. Julia Roberts is wonderfully warm, beguiling and nonsaccharine as the compassionate, wise title character, a spider who "spins" a publicity campaign to save her friend Wilbur the pig from the smokehouse--between this and The Ant Bully she's emerging as the cinema's prime interpreter of creatures with more than four legs! (Her vocals also help remedy the necessary hurdle of Charlotte's visual depiction; while all the farm animals are played by a seamless blend of real critters and realistic CGI, she's a very obvious visual effect: obviously cuter than any real arachnid gets to be, but out of sync with the rest of the creatures.) Steve Buscemi as the gleefully self-centered Templeton the rat manages the near-impossible: he matches Paul Lynde's peerless 1973 work, while Robert Redford's offbeat casting as a slightly cowardly horse is a more subdued delight. The director is equally well-cast; Gary Winick's two biggest previous ventures Tadpole and 13 Going on 30 dealt with the differences between adults and adolescents, and a major theme of White's book is growing up--whether by Wilbur reaching emotional maturity and independence or by his young master Fern growing less attentive to pigs and more so to boys. A few tonal changes don't hurt the original story but are worth mentioning: although the death of a very sympathetic character was treated by White not as a calamity or a disaster but as a very natural part of life (and may have been for some children who haven't lost loved ones or friends their first introduction to this concept), it's somewhat downplayed here perhaps to guarantee a G rating. In introducing two hungry crows (voiced by Andre Benjamin and Thomas Haden Church) who weren't in the book, the moviemakers have actually made Templeton's reluctance to search the junkyard for items that could save Wilbur's life somewhat more justifiable than sheer laziness and selfishness were in the original, since he definitely qualifies as a blue-plate special for the predatory birds! It's also an indication of how much times have changed that in the late 1970s/ early 1980s network showings of Mel Brooks' Blazing Saddles had slashed the legendary "bean scene" (so what was the point of showing it on TV in the first place?) but in this age of Captain Underpants, fart jokes in kids' movies are seemingly as essential as climactic boxing matches are in Rocky films. No exception is made here, but at least the obligatory passing of gas doesn't seem as contrived or out of place. After all, if your movie is going to feature barnyard humor, might as well set half of it in a barn! Expand
  4. ChrisH.
    3
    A truly overrated movie. Julia Roberts was insufferable as Charlotte. This was a boring movie. I took my nine year daughter to see Charlotte's Web. After 20 minutes she layed down on the seat to go asleep. I told her that I just paid $14 and she needed to stay awake. She got her revenge 20 minutes later when I was so bored to death that I tried to go to sleep. She woke me up to remind me that we were on a Father-Daughter date and that I should stay awake. Oh this was a boring film in case that has not come across strong enough. Expand

See all 20 User Reviews

Trailers