Generally favorable reviews - based on 24 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 24
  2. Negative: 2 out of 24
  1. 91
    In both halves, Soderbergh emphasizes observation over ideology with an eye toward the mundane details of life on the front lines of a revolution.
  2. 88
    Che looks dazzling, whether the camera is weaving through a battle or trying to bore into Che's haunted soul. Del Toro stands up to Soderbergh's relentless scrutiny. As for the movie, it's a reward to audiences eager to break from the play-it-safe pack. Game on.
  3. 88
    Benicio Del Toro, one of the film's producers, gives a heroic performance, not least because it's self-effacing.
  4. 88
    The labor applied to Che is apparent, but it would be wrong to characterize the movie as laborious the way it was in, say, 2006's "The Good German," where Soderbergh took great pains to re-create 1940s Hollywood wartime glamour.
  5. 83
    Leaving aside politics, it's quite an achievement in art.
  6. It's all about Guevara's education as a revolutionary and his development as a leader in the jungles and in battle.
  7. 80
    Every Bolivian sequence has its Cuban parallel, which is why Che's two parts are best seen together. Guerrilla may be the more realized of the two--and could certainly stand on its own--but it is only comprehensible in the light of The Argentine. Elevating Guerrilla to tragedy, The Argentine puts some hope in hopelessness--and even in history.
  8. Che is Soderbergh's most interesting film in years, defiantly eccentric and absorbing at its best.
  9. What this slow-moving but fascinating two-part portrait does do is hunker down in the jungles and mountains of Cuba and (in the second part) Bolivia, capturing in keen, almost Zen-like detail the trudging and trekking, the recruiting and strategizing, the fighting and the philosophizing.
  10. Reviewed by: Peter Brunette
    If this earnest, two-part biopic with a total running time of 268 minutes sometimes lacks cinematic flair, the straight-ahead, chronologically-driven film will inform and, to a somewhat lesser extent, excite viewers everywhere.
  11. 70
    I was never bored, in four hours-plus. Whether or not it ends up becoming a great film (or films), this is miles and miles beyond anything I thought Soderbergh could create from this material.
  12. Reviewed by: Sheri Linden
    The political realities of his legacy can be endlessly debated, but in this flawed work of austere beauty, the logistics of war and the language of revolution give way to something greater, a struggle that may be defined by politics but can't be contained by it.
  13. 70
    Mr. Soderbergh once again offers a master class in filmmaking. As history, though, Che is finally not epic but romance. It takes great care to be true to the factual record, but it is, nonetheless, a fairy tale.
  14. As political theater, Che moves from faith to impotence, which is certainly a valid reading of Communism in the 20th century. Yet as drama, that makes the second half of the film borderline deadly.
  15. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    Che is a mass of contradictions, perhaps like the iconic revolutionary himself.
  16. Reviewed by: Todd McCarthy
    If the director has gone out of his way to avoid the usual Hollywood biopic conventions, he has also withheld any suggestion of why the charismatic doctor, fighter, diplomat, diarist and intellectual theorist became and remains such a legendary figure; if anything, Che seems diminished by the way he's portrayed here.
  17. Although Steven Soderbergh's two-part Che may have an epic running time of almost 4-1/2 hours, its scope is surprisingly narrow.
  18. 50
    What potentially could have been the greatest asset possessed by Che - its unapologetic length - turns into its greatest detriment.
  19. 50
    The title and length suggest a biographical epic, but it's neither biographical nor epic. It's as if the director, Steven Soderbergh, wanted to take tissue samples of Ernesto Che Guevara's political life.
  20. Che is an impressive physical feat, but especially in the second part, which gives you day after day of rebels being killed and indigenous poor people not joining the good fight, you start to look forward to Che getting riddled by bullets. The whole movie is a forced march.
  21. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    In the end, the Cuban newspaper was nearly right: it's not the Castro character but the whole of this grand, doomed experiment that lacks "charisma and depth."
  22. 50
    It would be comforting, and tidy, to suggest that the director had waited all his life for the chance to make this film, as if it meant everything to him; yet I still have no idea what truly quickens his heart, and at some level, for all the movie’s narrative momentum, Che retains the air of a study exercise--of an interest brilliantly explored. How else to explain one's total flatness of feeling at the climax of each movie?
  23. 38
    You can't spell cliché without Che. And as I endured this mad dream directed - or perhaps committed - by Steven Soderbergh, I wondered where I'd seen it all before. The booted stomping through the greensward, the jungly target shooting? It's a remake of Woody Allen's "Bananas," right?
  24. If Soderbergh's ambition was to make us feel just how dull it would be to a woods-dwelling communist guerrilla, he succeeded.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 47 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 14 out of 18
  2. Negative: 1 out of 18
  1. Mar 6, 2014
    Bidragstagare är vi allihopa, allihopa, allihopa
    Bidragstagare är vi allihopa, allihopa, JAG MED
    Du med
    Och jag med.
    Arbete har ju ingen
    av oss, ingen av oss ingen av oss
    Arbete har ju ingen av oss, ingen av oss, inte du
    Inte jag,
    Och inte du.
    A-kassa har vi allihopa, allihopa, allihopa.
    A-kassa har vi allihopa, allihopa, JAG MED
    Du med
    Och jag med
    Blodlund fick arbete men pengar icke, pengar icke, pengar icke
    Blodlund fick arbete men pengar icke, pengar icke, inte alls
    Inte alls,
    Nej, inte alls.
    Staten finansierar ingen forskning, ingen forskning, ingen forskning
    Staten finansierar ingen forskning, ingen forskning, den drogs in
    Den drogs in,
    Ja den drogs in
    Utan nobelpris saknas pengar, saknas pengar, saknas pengar,
    Utan nobelpris saknas pengar, saknas pengar, helt klart
    Helt klart,
    Ja, helt klart.

    Musiken gav inte Edvin några pengar, några pengar, några pengar
    Musiken gav inte Edvin några pengar, några pengar, Inga pengar
    Inga pengar,
    Inga pengar alls
    Inte ens Gustav fick nå’ pengar, fick nå’ pengar, fick nå’ pengar.
    Inte ens Gustav fick nå’ pengar, fick nå’ pengar, bidrags dags
    Bidrags dags,
    Ja, bidrags dags.
    Full Review »
  2. Jan 11, 2013
    More interesting and impressive than enjoyable. Beautiful in parts and horrifying in others. But at times it seems like Soderburgh is more interested in honing his craft than producing a film for audiences. Full Review »
  3. Jan 6, 2012
    This is strangely dull for a biopic of such an interesting historical figure. I didn't hate it. The pace could be described as languid, and it goes on for 5 hours (in two parts on DVD; 'The Argentine', 'Guerilla'). Well shot and has the tinge of authenticity. More edifying than entertaining. I'm glad i watched it but i don't need to watch it again Full Review »