User Score
7.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 42 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 32 out of 42
-
Mixed: 3 out of 42
-
Negative: 7 out of 42
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
PaulS.Jan 20, 20092
-
-
MarianoA.Jan 10, 200910
-
-
JerryS.Jan 20, 20096
-
-
JimGJan 24, 20094I found this took a fascinating and polarizing figure of history and turned him into sheer boredom.
-
-
WCFeb 8, 200910Excellent film! It's fascinating to watch the ideologues, like those at the New York Post come out of the woodwork to get their digs in...oh well, they wouldn't be the Post if they were objective!
-
-
TyroneApr 27, 200910Unparalleled in execution and unbiasedness , a truly un-hollywood picture uncompromising and meticulously realized. there will never be another like it or not .
-
-
MCJan 4, 200910Fantastic and inspiring. Captures the idiolistic feelings and hopes of a reveloution in the first part and in the second it tears them apart.
-
-
BillyS.Feb 1, 20099Epic Filmmaking in every sense. Soderbergh has crafted his Godfather for the new century. Amazing in every detail with a brilliant Benicio Del Toro as Che. Don't talk about Oscar snubs for The Dark Knight and WALL-E, nothing for Che is just plain ignorant!
-
-
AndyB.Feb 12, 20099Utterly different to normak Hollywood fare- Engrossing, as it builds towardsa crescendo.
-
-
BecquerMFeb 20, 20099Captivating for Benicio Del Toro
-
-
Lizziebeth-1Jun 22, 20095My taste for this was ruined by 1. Higher (unmet) personal expectations about Che
-
-
BenderA.Dec 16, 200810
-
-
CEPDec 18, 200810Great film!
-
-
[Anonymous]Jan 17, 200910'Che' is an amazing journey, and is Soderbergh's masterpiece!
-
-
JohnM.Dec 17, 200810FYI, the TV Guide review you put up is actually for a 1969 movie called "Che!" starring Jack Palance. Thought you might want to fix that.
-
-
Jan 6, 20127This is strangely dull for a biopic of such an interesting historical figure. I didn't hate it. The pace could be described as languid, and it goes on for 5 hours (in two parts on DVD; 'The Argentine', 'Guerilla'). Well shot and has the tinge of authenticity. More edifying than entertaining. I'm glad i watched it but i don't need to watch it again
-
Jan 11, 20134More interesting and impressive than enjoyable. Beautiful in parts and horrifying in others. But at times it seems like Soderburgh is more interested in honing his craft than producing a film for audiences.
-
If this earnest, two-part biopic with a total running time of 268 minutes sometimes lacks cinematic flair, the straight-ahead, chronologically-driven film will inform and, to a somewhat lesser extent, excite viewers everywhere.
-
60If the director has gone out of his way to avoid the usual Hollywood biopic conventions, he has also withheld any suggestion of why the charismatic doctor, fighter, diplomat, diarist and intellectual theorist became and remains such a legendary figure; if anything, Che seems diminished by the way he's portrayed here.
-
80Every Bolivian sequence has its Cuban parallel, which is why Che's two parts are best seen together. Guerrilla may be the more realized of the two--and could certainly stand on its own--but it is only comprehensible in the light of The Argentine. Elevating Guerrilla to tragedy, The Argentine puts some hope in hopelessness--and even in history.