- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: Dec 21, 2005
User Score
3.3
out of 10
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 57 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 15 out of 57
-
Mixed: 8 out of 57
-
Negative: 34 out of 57
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
May 11, 20130
-
Nov 8, 20123This sour sequel is just more of what we saw the first time around, and I didn't much care for that either.
-
Jan 9, 20121The first one was weak, nothing special, a bad movie... but this sequel just sucks a lot. It isn't funny, enjoyable or good. It's bad, very very bad. Cheaper by the dozen? It's cheaper looking at a wall, and it's better.
-
ChristopherP.Nov 14, 20061
-
-
JGJul 8, 20061Perhaps a moment the corners of my mouth were tugged at a bit in the whole 2 hours. Really quite stupid. Bad humor.
-
-
GraemeW.Jun 19, 20060Even as a generic hollywood movie its bad, practically no laughs unless you take the mickey out of it- only a couple of actors rate and steve martin isn't one of them. Who cares about the charactors - no one in my family did - couldn't wait to get in out of the dvd player. More effort pu into tv dramas.
-
-
GerrickC.May 27, 20060
-
-
RobB.May 24, 20060I agree with the sentiment about Steve Martin. What happened??? He went from being the funniest person on the planet (see early SNL) to possibly the dullest individual in the entertainment industry.
-
-
EddieC.Apr 3, 20060Horrible movie, just like the first, and in fact, just like almost every comedy now-a-days... they try too hard to make you laugh, that you just feel like walking out.. remember the good old days when Steve Martin did good movies, and was actually funny?
-
-
Lau`renM.Mar 18, 20064This is very interesting.A couple good laughs but not realy good or really bad... just... interesting.
-
-
EstebanF.Feb 24, 20060
-
-
ChrissyFeb 11, 20060Simply horrible. Absolutely hated the first "Cheaper by the Dozen" movie, and this one is not better in the least. I wouldn't even take this movie from a free-bin. I honestly couldn't even finish it. It was completely dull, unfunny and one of the worst movies i've ever seen. Grandma's home movies are better then this folks :)
-
-
TheCriticJan 8, 20062Terrible. Not even worth sleeping through.
-
-
CharlesRJan 8, 20060Very poor.
-
-
MeYouJan 2, 20060Hilary Duff is all you need for a bad movie.
-
-
ThomasH.Dec 31, 20050No one buys eggs from the same store again after getting a dozen bad ones the first time! Just don't bother!!!
-
-
GeorgeF.Dec 29, 20051It was so bad I had trouble even sleeping through it.
-
-
LarryS.Dec 29, 20050Should have been called stupider by the dozen in memory of all the nitwits who payed money to see such a film!
-
-
meDec 26, 20050Hillary duff really looks awful. but not as awful as the idea of a sequel to this already boring, poorely directed and acted film...if you could use the world film.
-
-
GGDec 23, 20050Made a mockery of a movie going experience.
-
-
DanDec 22, 20051Nobody asked for a second one!!
-
-
SidneyB.Dec 21, 20051Poor Steve Martin! It's been years since he's been in a movie worthy of his enourmous talent.
-
-
This messy blend of silly slapstick and oversentimentality probably won't please children, teenagers or adults.
-
70A family comedy that is actually involving, even believable, and manages to be pretty funny too.
-
40A textbook example of how not to mess with success, Cheaper by the Dozen 2 is every bit as forced, synthetic, banal and mawkish as the first edition.