- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: Jun 26, 2009
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
100Now that she's past 50, can we all stop holding Michelle Pfeiffer's looks against her and just admit that she's a great actress?
-
100Plenty of terrible movies know how to work your tear ducts. Here's a weepie that, in Pfeiffer's performance, touches you on the highest levels.
-
88The success of Stephen Frears' film Chéri begins with its casting. Michelle Pfeiffer, as Lea de Lonval, is still a great beauty.
-
83Pfeiffer transcends any hint of cliché ''cougar'' voraciousness.
-
80Actors blossom under Frears' direction. There is no false moment or off-key note in this movie.
-
78They don't make women, sexy but regal, like Pfeiffer much anymore, and Cheri is quite a monument to her.
-
75With Pfeiffer, 50, radiating uncommon beauty, grace and feeling, Frears uncovers a fragile story's grieving heart.
-
75What makes Cheri' worth your while is that its true subjects are women and age, and its observations apply to both 19th-century France and the modern film industry.
-
75A respectable and satisfying historical romantic melodrama.
-
75The film is a sumptuous, handsome portrait of a woman poised fearfully on the brink of decline, yet too proud to grab at rescue.
-
70Michelle Pfeiffer is back, and her reappearance in Cheri, her best role in quite some time, underlines not only how much she's been missed but also how much the world of film has lost by her absence.
-
70The movie reunites Pfeiffer with director Stephen Frears and screenwriter Christopher Hampton, who did Dangerous Liaisons (1988); this costume drama doesn't have nearly as much bite as that one, though the age reversal of its central romance gives it a certain topicality.
-
63The movie is a visual feast, with Oscar-caliber sets and costumes that for many will justify the trip to the Paris Theatre.
-
63What is lacking in this version, with its hasty third act and abrupt denouement, is the surprise that their union may be the deepest love either will ever know.
-
63Cheri, like the character, is an entertaining bauble without much on its mind.
-
63Michelle Pfeiffer's performance brings life to a sometimes sagging script. Also, Kathy Bates is a hoot as the mother of Pfeiffer's love interest.
-
60The movie's shallow amusements do make for an ideal guilty pleasure, especially since the actors seem to be having so much fun. Bates, marching around like an overstuffed pigeon, is a reliable scene-stealer, while the two leads make an entirely convincing couple.
-
Cheri looks terrific, if a bit gauzy at times, and Frears, who directed Pfeiffer in that other Frenchified frolic, "Dangerous Liaisons," is never at rest. Still, the movie bogs down by going nowhere other than inside its characters, who are intensely passionate but of an era more curious than emotionally relevant.
-
50Chéri never fulfills its emotional promise.
-
50What's so distressing about Michelle Pfeiffer taking a mooning calf for a lover, though, is that it robs her of the quality that has always made her such an interesting actress.
-
50Whereas "Liaisons" mixed cruelty, wit, sensuality and drama into a deliciously tart frappe, Cheri is pretty, tepid and dull.
-
50Chéri is a perfect example of a movie that gets many of the details right and the vibe all wrong.
-
50There's something poignant about the image of this actress (Pfeiffer) sitting in a pool of sunlight without a smile or trace of visible makeup. But she's trying to reach a character that her director seems intent to keep from her grasp.
-
50Like a passable bottle of champagne, Cheri fizzes and slides down quite easily but lacks real body and doesn't really hit the spot.
-
40This glimpse into a decadent era has its charms, but they're mostly visual. While Pfeiffer and Friend perform well, the script is tonally confused and lacks edge.
-
40Michelle Pfeiffer is brittle in a way that's not especially French, but she's poignant and very lovely. Rupert Friend, on the other hand, is difficult to warm up to, especially with his features hidden behind all that hair. It's not a good sign when you have to take the movie's word for it that the lovers at its center are really, really into each other.
-
40Frears and Hampton's missteps begin immediately, with the director providing pinched narration as he recounts, over so many cartes de visite, the histories of other famous ladies who made a handsome living on their backs.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 2 out of 4
-
Mixed: 1 out of 4
-
Negative: 1 out of 4
-
giu10Pfeiffer shines in the movie. She's the only reason!
-
roberti4Except for Pfeiffer, the casting is laughable and undermines any hope of credibility. Bates as a former courtesan? Friend as a paramour? Please.
-
Bichanel10One of Michelle Pfeiffer's best performances. She also looks so beautiful in this film.