- Studio: Universal Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 25, 2006
User Score
7.8
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 626 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 498 out of 626
-
Mixed: 30 out of 626
-
Negative: 98 out of 626
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
BenHJun 1, 20093Great filming.. but poorly developed characters, a complete lack of direction, point or cohesion and heaps of mindless violence and ugliness add up to equal the same old crap we've been shoveled for the last 30 years.
-
-
DonaldC.Mar 27, 20071The only thing half way interesting is that the child is born to a young black girl as it should be considering the black women is the mother of earth.
-
-
BrianK.Sep 1, 20073
-
-
BenJan 5, 20071
-
-
ApocalypseBrownMar 3, 20073Pathetic! Tries hard to be something it can never be, which is classy.
-
-
AnonymousMCApr 18, 20070I recently rented this movie, and i though it was one of the worst movies i've ever seen. So much more could of been with the plot,. The director failed to keep the movie interesting, everything happened too quick and some of the scenes were pointless and kind of cheesy.
I expected so much more from this film and whoever thinks this movie was good obviosly does not know anything about films -
-
PnArdyPnArdyMay 13, 20072This is one of the most boring and awful blockbusters with horrible acting, decorations, plot, and SFX, I've ever seen. It Definetely doesn't deserve 8 out of 10. Clive Owen plays a legal citizen in the post-apocalyptic world of NWO of the near future. He has to smuggle the last pregnant woman on Earth past the all seeing eyes of NWO spies in the city of London under marshall law.
-
-
JamesL.Jan 6, 20082Boring mindless chase movie. Who's side are we supposed to root for? Problem is you tend not to care. The only thing I was rooting for were the closing credits.
-
-
MikeH.Jan 10, 20070
-
-
IrwinJan 15, 20072Hardly original, Children of Men
-
-
JeffD.Jan 24, 20073This movie has the same feel as "28 days later" yet fails to bring the audience in and allow them to care what's happening to the characters. Storyline had great potential but is filled with meaningless and uninteresting dialog as well as an over-abundance of violence which adds nothing to the story or the progression of the characters themselves. A 2-hour waste of time.
-
-
V.MartinezJan 28, 20072
-
-
DavidH.Jan 3, 20073
-
-
RichardF.Jan 8, 20071What a piece of crap. The set design came directly from the computer game Half Life 2. The story was so thin as to be unbelievable. The premise of a new pregnancy as meaty enough to carry an entire film is laughable. As for the so-called critics- they just use movies as a vehicle for little essays that show their own clever use of words but show no insight into the film itself. Sign me disgusted.
-
-
GeorgeH.Jan 9, 20073
-
-
JosephFeb 12, 20071
-
-
JeannieFeb 2, 20073
-
-
JohnF.Feb 3, 20072I assume the high rating from people is more a political statement instead a true evaluation of the movie. I was very disapointed. The movie was slow and boring. The political message was beaten into us. I expected much better.
-
-
JohnT.Mar 24, 20071After reading all these reviews, maybe I saw the wrong movie. But it was horrible and pointless. Don't waste your time.
-
-
MikeyGrayMar 31, 20070Reminds me of those bad 1980s doomsday scifi action flicks, only with a less interesting plot, and even more lacking in character development.
-
-
MattMar 30, 20072Well shot, simplistic, clumsily acted B movie.
-
-
DavidT.Apr 1, 20073Shot VERY Well...Which is Half the Battle BUT a VERY Bad Story Line! Very Anit-Climatic!!!
-
-
AideenM.Apr 22, 20072What a waste! So much could have been made of this plot: why was she the only woman to get pregnant? How did it happen? Who's the father? Instead, it was just one long, dreary, chase.
-
-
JoK.Apr 29, 20072Thoroughly depressing - not enough story, too much unintelligable dialogue, drawn out action scene where basically anyone you grow any affection for is violently eradicated (why couldn't they have got rid off the guy with the blonde dreadlocks wayyyy earlier - and him finding them in Bexhill like that? Annoyingly improbable).
-
-
PeterJ.May 3, 20073When I ready all of the reviews for this movie I could not wait to see it. The storyline looked awesome in retrospect. I was so disappointed that this turned into some kind of future concentration camp movie. I know the premise of this movie was unrealistic to being with, but I was looking for something a little more believeable...
-
-
JohnG.May 3, 20072Liberal fear mongering. Keep your politics out of the plot and perhaps this movie would have been better. Characters were boring, the case boring, the action scenes boring. I don't mind having to think through a movie, but you can be more clever than this drivel.
-
-
TimH.May 12, 20084This movie Ruend the Book. Any one who watches this movie should have read the book first. The Book Was Way Better.
-
-
MartyH.Jun 6, 20080This was a truly awful film, what a waste of nearly 2 hours. The film ended as abruptly as it started and left so many things unanswered, it made me wonder what the point was in sitting through such doom and gloom. There is no genius in this film at all, despite what others may say. I would not even give it one star! Your time would be better spent watching paint dry! You have been warned!
-
-
SibylPJan 1, 20093The cinematography, the art direction, are interesting, the cast is good except for Miriam and Kee (not so much), but all have been put to the service of a bogus vision. What the heck is the point? Infertility is hardly a problem in the real world. Overpopulation is more of a problem. In
-
-
BenWDec 27, 20062It is one thing to suspend belief for the plot's main storyline, but another to ignore the inconsistencies strewn throughout the movie. Why would the soldiers let them just wander off after discovering the only baby born in the last 18 years?
-
-
70Children of Men leaves too many questions unanswered, yet it has a stunning visceral impact. You can forgive a lot in the face of filmmaking this dazzling.
-
80Picture more than delivers on the action front -- not in bang-for-your-buck spectacle but in the kind of gritty, doculike sequences that haul viewers out of their seats and alongside the main protags.
-
80Owen carries the film more in the tradition of a Jimmy Stewart or Henry Fonda than a Clint Eastwood or Harrison Ford. He has to wear flip-flops for part of the time without losing his dignity, and he never reaches for a weapon or guns anyone down. Cuaron and Owen may have created the first believable 21st-century movie hero.