- Studio: Sony Pictures Classics
- Release Date: Mar 26, 2010
User Score
5.3
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 48 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 25 out of 48
-
Mixed: 12 out of 48
-
Negative: 11 out of 48
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
FionaR.Mar 29, 20101This movie is nothing but trash!! No message, no suspense no nothing.
-
-
bdogMar 28, 20100Preposterous. Hooker develops emotional attachment to THREE in the same family!?!? Superlative films don't need to show as much nudity as this one does--the saving grace(s) are the nude features of the female protagonists. Utter waste. Attended NY premiere and was blown away at atrocity.
-
-
Sep 13, 20102It started out really good; good story good acting and eventually developed into what I thought was going to be a thriller. Some interesting twists to the plot...however. The end completely blows the picture. Really, really weak ending...my wife and I were disappointed.
-
Nov 2, 20101One of the weirdest films I have seen all year, and not in a good way. Oscar winners pair up to do a terrible film ..... what a shame. http://www.dukeandthemovies.com/search?q=Chloe
-
May 2, 20120This movie is terrible. It's very, very predictable, even if you have only a little imagination. It only gets a good review from critics, because Liam Neeson is in it. Don't waste your time.
-
60Fails to completely satisfy, thanks to problems with the script that neither director nor stars can overcome.
-
60Strong turns from its female leads and Amanda Seyfried elicits more sexual tension from proceedings than "Jennifer's Body" ever managed.
-
70Moore and Neeson beautifully underplay their roles, lending screenwriter Erin Cressida Wilson's ("Secretary") dialogue an unexpected, palpable poignancy.