- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Sep 6, 2002
User Score
6.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 18 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 11 out of 18
-
Mixed: 5 out of 18
-
Negative: 2 out of 18
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
LyndseyM.Sep 6, 20022What a downer.
-
-
JohnN.Mar 1, 20069
-
-
NolanB.Oct 6, 20024WHY DE NIRO?? WHY????
-
-
PhilD.Mar 8, 20038Am I the only one who actually enjoyed this movie? The story was great, the actors were great. Actually, the only thing I hated was the Spyder caracter...too cliche for me but it's still a great flick.
-
-
MattF.May 30, 20038This movie really taught how no matter what you are and your son may go through, that you'll always try and work things out. His dad (Robert De Niro) was determined to get his son out of trouble.
-
-
PatC.Jan 13, 20045It was thought-provoking, but would then expose those thoughts as irrelevant. One thought that got through is that sometimes fathers have to make hard choices.
-
-
JohnJ.Oct 21, 20021Oh ouch! De Niro produced it....that was his first mistake. It stunk as badly as the scenery looked!
-
-
TonyL.Oct 7, 20027Not a bad one. I was more interested in the relationships throughout the movie than the actual hunt for the murder. Nice non-glamour turn by Elisha Dhusku. I wish she gotten more screen time.
-
-
BobG.Sep 16, 20026The movie is a little slow but has its moments. James Franco is clearly a star in the making, but there wasn't enough screen time for Frances McDormand. She's too good to play such a small role, and when she and DeNiro are in a scene together, it's a joy to watch.
-
-
AppleH.Sep 16, 20027Robert DeNiro was Robert DeNiro meaning he was usual excellent self. James Franco steals the film as his drug addicted lost son. Not a blockbuster but definitely worth the watch.
-
-
RobertH.Sep 7, 20027
-
-
TommyL.Mar 19, 20035Boring...nothing really wrong with the movie...just boring.
-
-
[Anonymous]Jul 20, 20057Flawed, but it fleshes out how horrid things can be in NYC's dark side. Deniro acts a bit wussy in a scene, though, and some emotional scenes feel cliched. nevertheless, decent entertainment.
-
-
SheriA.Oct 19, 20026If you look up the word "plodding" in the dictionary, the poster for this movie will be right next to it. Some pretty good acting but a thin story and pacing that is way too slow.
-
-
Feb 2, 20134
-
40After the complex buildup of tensions, the last ten minutes of the movie are a comic-pathetic letdown: the subdued acting and the trash-strewn street scenes lead to nothing more striking than the kind of overexplicit clichés heard in mediocre TV dramas. Even De Niro's discipline and skill can't save lines that should never have been spoken in the first place. [9 September 2002, p.162]
-
50Frances McDormand and Patti LuPone are solid as his girlfriend and ex-wife, respectively, and James Franco is just right as his wayward son. They're a talented team. Too bad the movie doesn't live up to their abilities.
-
50That City by the Sea isn't laughed off the screen is testament to Caton-Jones' attention to actors and to some tightly written scenes.