- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Apr 1, 2010
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
38There's nothing worse than a boring behemoth.
-
38The results are -- there’s no other word for it -- a disaster.
-
38In the new Clash of the Titans, the effects are computerized, the hero is questionable and, instead of an owl, we get a turkey.
-
25The film is a sham, with good actors going for the paycheck and using beards and heavy makeup to hide their shame.
-
No matter how you dissect it, Clash of the Titans will never, ever be a serious motion picture.
-
In striving for a combination of grit and grandeur, Leterrier misses a chance to make the kind of camp classic that could have endured for generations. Instead, it's a muddled disappointment.
-
20Can't overcome mythic stupidity.
-
30Unlike the original -- which, in a crazy stroke of genius, allowed Shakespearean thespians like Claire Bloom and Maggie Smith, plus Bond babe Ursula Andress, to mix it up as jealous goddesses -- the new Clash of the Titans is frightfully low on babes.
-
30It isn’t a train wreck--a train wreck would be memorable. What’s wrong is wrong by design.
-
30It's doubtful that records are kept about this sort of thing, but consider the possibility that Clash of the Titans is the first film to actually be made worse by being in 3-D.
-
This remake is interesting mainly for the chance to see top-flight acting talent labor over dialogue so leaden you could cast bullets from it.
-
20What's wrong with this sad fiasco goes far beyond its visual deficits.
-
10Clash seems to be deliberately steering clear of camp, when in fact it should have steered straight into camp and stepped on the gas.