Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) | Release Date: July 21, 2006
7.4
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 164 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
126
Mixed:
21
Negative:
17
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
2
JakeJ.Apr 27, 2007
Boring. Trite. Jokes were forced. Clerks is a classic. Clerks 2 is a waste of time.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
AtomH.Aug 2, 2006
Kevin Smith has used up whatever borrowed fuel he had.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
JillM.Jul 24, 2006
Painful.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
K.W.Jul 21, 2006
Worse than JERSEY GIRL. Avoid!!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BrandonJul 22, 2006
If your reason for liking kevin Smith movies is Randall, and you think the dirtier a conversation is, the better it is, then this movie is for you. If you like Kevin Smith for smart dialogue with simultaneously lowbrow/highbrow jokes, and If your reason for liking kevin Smith movies is Randall, and you think the dirtier a conversation is, the better it is, then this movie is for you. If you like Kevin Smith for smart dialogue with simultaneously lowbrow/highbrow jokes, and you like Kevin Smith movies for Jay, Silent Bob, Dante, or any of the other charachters who are not Randall, then this movie is NOT FOR YOU. They're all in there, and totally hilarious as always, but it is primarily a "how dirty can randall talk?!?!?" film, and you will hear him talk very dirty for a very long time. Jeff Anderson, as opposed to Jason Mewes, just isn't an inherently funny enough guy to carry a film like that. Most of his inherent humor was used up in Clerks 1. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
LynnC.Jul 26, 2006
I went to see this movie today. I was disgusted at the language in it and asked for a refund which I received. I read a few reviews but didn't realise the content was so crude.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
DavisR.Aug 29, 2006
In 2002 it was clear, Kevin Smith should have stopped making movies in 1994. Four years and there was no sign of him or his tent-of-a-jersey and the film world was at peace. Until he shows up at Cannes with this piece of .... that ruined In 2002 it was clear, Kevin Smith should have stopped making movies in 1994. Four years and there was no sign of him or his tent-of-a-jersey and the film world was at peace. Until he shows up at Cannes with this piece of .... that ruined what made the original so great to everyone. Now that Smith has been booed out of France, dropped from Miramax, and closed the coffin on his Askewniverse, he can finally stop torturing us with his movies and get rich off of selling Jay & SIlent Bob merchandise to kids. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
HollyC.Jan 16, 2007
Wow, what was Kevin Smith's excuse for this pile of crap? At least the first one had a sort of film-school debut-vibe going on. But Clerks II was just sad. Terrible acting, terrible story, terrible dialogue--everything sort of fell flat Wow, what was Kevin Smith's excuse for this pile of crap? At least the first one had a sort of film-school debut-vibe going on. But Clerks II was just sad. Terrible acting, terrible story, terrible dialogue--everything sort of fell flat for me. Which made all the raunchy stuff toward the end seem even more desperate. Silent Bob & Jay are literally the only cool things in this movie--and they have maybe (maybe!) five minutes total screen time. What a disappointment. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful