- Studio: Paramount Pictures
- Release Date: Jan 18, 2008
User Score
6.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 750 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 473 out of 750
-
Mixed: 46 out of 750
-
Negative: 231 out of 750
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Aug 20, 20100
-
Dec 27, 20124While there is a good premise, and although I do understand the reason why they shot the film the way they did - all in all, this is at best, a late-night movie and not a grand cinematic experience what could expect. Diagnosis: You're not missing much if you pass it, and you might like it. The effects are terrific!
-
Apr 29, 20123
-
Apr 1, 20130Easily one of the worst films I've seen. There really is nothing good about it. It is film that combines inane and pointless dialogue, bad acting, and no real scares or tension. Thankfully it has a running time of just 85 minutes (which still felt like a life time). One that is definitely best avoided.
-
Sep 9, 20103Well executed, entertaining stuff, but did we REALLY need this to be set in New York? The whole film seems designed to cynically exploit the relatively fresh memories of Sept 11th. The film loses several points for feeling like being repeatedly whacked over the head with a copy of the 9/11 Commission Report...
-
Apr 23, 20110
-
JoeJ.Jan 21, 20080
-
-
AngelaH.Jan 23, 20082Good idea but god that movie made me SO nauseas... it was shaky and it wouldn't stop moving and it was short. if it has stayed in place it would have worked... not a real story tho...just just goes with its... if u don't get movie sick then ya. but don't go for it.
-
-
SJN.Jan 29, 20081Total rubbish ridden with factual, technical, military and continuity errors.
-
-
TonyBJan 30, 20080
-
-
MarcoH.Feb 21, 20080The worst film of all time - pointless, amateurish, pretentious. Everyone involved should feel embarrassed.
-
-
BBFeb 3, 20083Awful movie! Luckily it is very short.
-
-
KateP.Feb 5, 20080Can someone wake me when the movie begins... Such poor acting... A cure for people with insomnia
-
-
BongoMcFluffFeb 7, 20083
-
-
AdamS.Mar 25, 20080
-
-
MattsApr 8, 20080sucked. jittery camera gave many people motion sickness. real life isn't that jittery even when you are running. lame!
-
-
CrisL.May 25, 20084Visual affects brilliant although the story was very ordinary ,Left in suspense through the film and it just cut off with no ending. The first person's view I did not like.I walked away feeling "what a wast of my time".
-
-
zachrJun 1, 20080Terrible, predictable no suspense at all.
-
-
ChrisLJul 11, 20082Abysmal garbage. Let's see lame Cliffhanger, terrible acting, piss poor plot= FAIL. I must give credit for the cgi effects however. Nevertheless don't throw garbage like this towards us Paramount. You should have learned your lessons from War of the Worlds or any of your other disastrous Sci-fiction/monster releases.
-
-
JasonT.Jul 9, 20081Special Effects were as good as the story was bad! I'm still mad that I wasted an hour and a half of my life watching this rubbish!
-
-
DaveG.Aug 3, 20080Anyone that gave this piece of crap higher than a 0 should stick to watching sesame street. If I want to want home movies I visit the jackass down the street. I was disappointed when I missed this on the big screen. Now I'm glad I missed it. It would have been a bigger piece of crap at a higher cost of seeing it. I would classify this as docu-crap.
-
-
AmbroseJan 17, 20082
-
-
MikeM.Jan 18, 20080the worst movie i've ever seen. the handheld camera movements literally mad me sick. i had to leave the theatre. besides that, the movie was weak on all levels. garbage.
-
-
DavibP.Jan 18, 20081the camera made me feel sick and there was no real story.
-
-
jacobmJan 19, 20080I have one comment about this movie. It's a waste of time.
-
-
MaryM.Jan 19, 20080
-
-
JoshC.Jan 19, 20081This movie made my eyes want to bleed and gave me a headache. As a New Yorker the allusions to 9/11 were tacky. The monster had no story and the characters were idiots and I'm glad they all died.J.J Abrams and company hide a truly moronic story behind clever marketing. They get an A+ in marketing and an F for actual movie.
-
-
SamF.Jan 21, 20081
-
-
KentK.Jan 21, 20081
-
-
ScottHJan 20, 20082The idea of the movie was decent but the camera work was so bad it pretty much made it impossible to watch. The special effects were ok, but limited. The action was there throughout the movie, but it was really lame. I didn
-
-
RichardJ.Jan 20, 20080Just watched the film in Malaysia and must say it was the biggest piece of crap I have ever seen. At the end of the movie people just sat there and after a couple of minutes got up and walked out without any of the normal chatter you get when someone has enjoyed the experience. It was like a dentists waiting room. Biggest waste of time and money I feel cheated.
-
-
JasmineP.Jan 22, 20082
-
-
GianellaG.Jan 25, 20080So bad it was pointless horrible one of the worst movies i've ever seen i regret watching it i don't reccomend it.
-
-
DannyHOct 2, 20080
-
-
JoeL.Jan 27, 20081
-
-
KenLJan 30, 20081The Blair Witch Godzilla Project. Enough said.
-
-
MariaDFeb 10, 20080
-
-
KimberlyJ.Feb 23, 20080Horrible movie. Way too much hipe. Characters were annoying. "Plot" was annoying. Film style was annoying. Hated it.
-
-
JaredB.Feb 3, 20080
-
-
JimC.Feb 3, 20084There was bad acting and the camera work was terrible. It got annoying after a while, but overall it was okay I guess. I liked the statue of liberty head flying off.
-
-
TimWFeb 4, 20084Cloverfield was not a great movie. I was told there would be scares and jump-out-of-your-seat moments. I didn't jump once. Also, I found the characters unengaging. The party scene at the beginning was way too long and dull, populated as it was by cardboard characters.
-
-
ssFeb 4, 20080We went to see it at the cinema, throughout the movie people were leaving, because of how rubibish the film was. When the film ended, the whole cinema groaned. A totally rubbish and pointless movie....... please no sequel!!!!!!
-
-
TonyFeb 5, 20080The first 20 minutes were so boring I fell asleep, a first at the cinema, and when the explosions woke me up I thought "at last it's started." I might as well of stayed asleep as the awful hand held camera made it unwatchable. Worst film since Blair Witch Project which used the same diabolical system. Tony
-
-
BenT.Feb 6, 20080no alien looks that way because i have the omnitrix and i know aliens. Diamondhead, now that is an alien!
-
-
SusieM.Feb 6, 20081
-
-
RamM.Feb 6, 20080
-
-
PhilB.Feb 8, 20080Love the idea but but but I had to close my eyes after c.10 minutes as nausea / motion sickness kicked in due to the 1st person perspective, shaky hand-held camcorder filming, and I wasn't even close to the screen. It sounded good though! Did anyone else suffer from this?
-
-
MaximumR.Feb 9, 20082At the movie theaters, I paid 8 dollars to see the movie. I had a bucket of popcorn, candy, and a smoothie. But even with all of that, the movie was horrible and i left halfway through the movie.
-
-
TomPMar 2, 20083Cloverfield made no sense to me. There is no plot at all to the story even when the soldiers are involved in the quarantine of personnel because of the
-
-
JeffR.Apr 19, 20082movie was good, if i could see it. good plot good action, good effects. Thank god Transformers was not shot like clover.
-
-
KenW.Apr 24, 20080
-
-
HeatherR,Apr 26, 20081This seems to be the only movie that actully wanted to make me barf. Literally. The constant moving and shaking of the camera gave me the worst head ache!! I gave it a one because maybe one or two parts where funny or cool. Yet, it wasn't scary. It wasn't very funny. Over all it was hard to watch because of the shaking. Oh, and ending sucked.
-
-
TomLApr 26, 20080
-
-
SteveTApr 30, 20081Most of this movie is camera shots of peoples shoes. Boring 3rd rate actors and very annoying cinematography. I absolutely hate this movie. It is trash masquerading as art. If you liked Blair Witch you will probably liked this too but I consider Blair Witch the No.1 most overrated movie ever made, Cloverfield is the second.
-
-
KennyCMay 27, 20080
-
-
JoeT.May 31, 20082Movie sucked. blair witch camera work. story starts and ends giving you absolutely no information on whats going on.
-
-
IanMJun 16, 20082I am littering this with [***SPOILERS***]spoiler alerts so don
-
-
MattB.Jun 30, 20080
-
-
JimOJun 6, 20080Not very thrilling or terrifying, cloverfield puts you through a story which is so far fetched I was shocked not to see some disney characters coming by to say hi. woman that are dying for the entire movie somehow live and is just as active as the other characters in the film. The entire city of NY is evacuated in 2hours? very far fetched.
-
-
DanMJul 4, 20080
-
-
BenC.Nov 10, 20084Suspenseful, but not enjoyable. Clover itself is a pretty poor monster compared to say, some of the Godzilla movie monsters.
-
-
AnankeJan 18, 20083
-
-
ErikB.Jan 18, 20080Completely and utterly pointless. Lead in scenes too long and drawn out, and I was actually surprised to see as the credits rolled that there had even been a script. God help us if they make more of these movies. This film was so bad it made me hate every movie I've paid for in the last 5 years.
-
-
NKJan 18, 20082
-
-
JasonMJan 19, 20082I pray to god that this style of filmaking dies with this film. I did not pay $7 to watch a guy run around with a handheld video camera. If Blair Witch meets Godzilla meets You Tube is your thing, then this movie is for you.
-
-
NeoPJan 19, 20080
-
-
DarrylFJan 19, 20083Total waste ! so much potential.. I guess I was expecting so much more !
-
-
ChadS.Jan 19, 20084
-
-
MichaelR.Jan 19, 20082
-
-
RebeccaS.Jan 19, 20081This movie was a waste of my time. It was way too bloody, violent and just plain stupid. The first 20 minutes were boring-just bring a pillow and blanket and sleep for the first 20 minutes. This movie was so bad people in walking out! Save your money and time and go get ice cream instead of seeing this movie.
-
-
AlexRJan 19, 20081
-
-
GabeK.Jan 21, 20081Boring, lifeless movie. I decided to give it a 1 just because of all the talk it has created. Anyone who gives this movie higher than a 6 is either: mentally retarded, smokes pot, or is a liberal arts major.
-
-
MichaelDJan 21, 20083Seems like a re-hash of several other movies. When it comes down to it; it just isn't that exciting. The movie was hyped way too much. Just OK, wait for DVD.
-
-
toddgotJan 21, 20080this movie sucked so much ass that i wanted to shoot myself after watchin it the special effects were ok but when the guy and the girl just sat under a bridge and waited to die that was bull shit they needed to have some kind of ending in stead of just sitting there extremely disappointed.
-
-
michaelhJan 21, 20081Terrible movie! I wasn't expecting Godzillas buddy to show up and the shaky camera work made everyone dizzy!
-
-
CModeJan 22, 20080
-
-
TonyLJan 22, 20083I like the way the monster was presented, but I cared about little else in this film. A film like this only works when you care about one or more of the main actors, I didn't care for any of them. I wanted the monster to eat them all. Cable only!
-
-
GaborA.Jan 22, 20083
-
-
AnonymousJan 22, 20082The trailer tells the entire story - with very little else to learn. I found this film to be a complete rip off. I wanted to love it however I left unfulfilled. If you like "Blair Witch" then you will like this film.
-
-
RustyS.Jan 22, 20080I also agree on this being one of the worst movies ever produced. Horrible camera work (even for a handheld) horrible acting, no plot, no background, no anything that a good or even decent movie should have. When the movie was over, everyone just sat there. When the credits began to roll, the groans and complaints started. I'd like a refund for this movie because I too feel cheated.
-
-
MichelleSJan 22, 20080
-
-
JeffT.Jan 22, 20081I was so let down. Blair Witch was cool, this was not.
-
-
BetsMJan 22, 20081Terrible movie, camera work made me want to throw up. Didn't care anything about the people, monster could have killed them all and the world wouldn't be any worse off. The only reason I didn't give it a zero is that I didn't get up and leave (not sure why but I suffered through the whole horrible thing).
-
-
keithcJan 22, 20081
-
-
EWJan 23, 20080
-
-
JimK.Jan 28, 20083Yes this film does keep you awake, while waitng to see what this thing is, but in the end its alot of nothing. The acting was annoying, the video camera perspective was played out after about 5 minutes, and i thought the creature was anything but original and not scary. I hate that its true after waiting to see this thing, but it did suck.
-
-
ThekgvJan 31, 20084
-
-
LesC.Feb 1, 20080I had a headache within the first 5 minutes(Blair Witch had the same effect on me) - and then I was Nauseous within 10 minutes - It was terrible - no focus, camera moving to quick, I would give it a -1 if that was possible.
-
-
JoseO.Feb 11, 20080What a waste of time, this is a very bad mix between Blair witch project and Godzilla, this is not a original concept and has bad acting... if you want to see a really good monster movie take a look to the host.
-
-
SuzanneA.Feb 15, 20083
-
-
BobbyR.Feb 16, 20081My eyes are exhausted and I have a touch of what feels like motion sickness! was an awful film.
-
-
GrahamLFeb 18, 20080The worst film I've ever seen in my life, bar none.
-
-
HerbieHuskerFeb 19, 20082Original concept, but I was feeling sick by the end.
-
-
JezzPFeb 2, 20080It would have been a great movie if they didnt have so much of the camcorder thing. I got sick watching the movie and half of the time I was annoyed by screaming and cutoffs. Poor quality movie...
-
-
JoeyDFeb 6, 20083I didn't like the Blair Witch movie at all but this handheld technique has potential, its just a question of who can utilize it effectively & not go O.T.T (like what happened to 'Bullet time'). JJ couldn't do it, not yet anyway. So after watching an awesome trailer I'm sad to say this movie didn't deliver for me.
-
-
hOLY----Feb 9, 20080OMG.After watching this suckish movie,I found that i would have had a better time drowning myself in a lake full of crap rather than watching cloverfield.I actually threw up because of the motion sickness i endured.
-
-
FlonkelD.Feb 9, 20083The entire movie is filmed as if from a hand-held video camera. While the idea is perhaps novel, the execution is very annoying. Double thumbs down from me.
-
-
BrawnBoyMar 6, 20080This movie totally sucked. I wasted $25 dollars to see it. This has got to be one of the things I most regret. The movie made no sense. The plot....there was no plot!!! Worst of all the monster looked pretty lame. And the camera seemed to be moving around a whole lot too much. It even made my G-friend dizzy and sick. So we left the movie early. Thank goodness.....
-
-
RandalflagMar 8, 20080
-
-
BenSApr 21, 20082
-
-
75Cloverfield's gritty, in-your-face style is uncompromising. If you're looking for a nice, clean movie filmed with a steadycam, you'll have to look elsewhere.
-
70Think "Godzilla Unplugged" -- with chillingly effective results.
-
83Cloverfield, a surreptitiously subversive, stylistically clever little gem of an entertainment disguised, under its deadpan-neutral title, as a dumb Gen-YouTube monster movie, makes the convincingly chilling argument that the world will end -- or, at least, Manhattan will crumble -- with a bang and a whimper.