- Studio: Buena Vista Pictures
- Release Date: Nov 22, 2006
User Score
4.9
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 126 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 65 out of 126
-
Mixed: 12 out of 126
-
Negative: 49 out of 126
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Sep 29, 20116The movie starts out cool and brazen, but in the end it barely manages to hold itself from the tireless cliches it created. A movie I would recommend to rent & watch.
-
BallisticYoursFeb 16, 20085
-
-
ElegyL.Oct 8, 20072Gave me neat-o images to look at...and time travel can be a very interesting theme...however, the movie was simply a piece of sh-t.
-
-
SamF.Dec 2, 20067Not a bad film ...Ive seen much worse. Concept was okay but mixed time travel at the end with looking back in time for most of the film which dulled it alot. Questions abound this movie, but if your mind is open to anything is possible with time travel then it works.
-
-
HariS.Feb 21, 20076Taking out the absurdly and illogical end, this film is amazing, with a very interesting idea and one of most original car-chasing sequences in the movie history.
-
-
CongoG.Nov 26, 20060
-
-
TammmieNov 28, 20060One of the dumbest movies I have ever seen. Everything was disjointed and the ending was awful. Much ado about nothing.
-
-
VirginaA.Dec 2, 20060Terribly disappointing effort even by such a great actor as Denzel Washington. No chemistry, no nothing, as it was very difficult to have any feeling for all of these discombobulated characters. Who approved this lame script?
-
-
DevinDec 6, 20069I thoroughly enjoyed Deja Vu. For those who labeled it as "hard to follow" or "not making any sense", that may be true for some people, but most of the educated public will enjoy a movie that actually makes you THINK and figure out the movie. The acting was great, special effects were good, but it had an original storyline and it was overall an intense action drama. A must-see.
-
-
DarrylCriticApr 23, 20074When someone writes "A perfect movie with good actors and a more than perfect scenario" when most experienced and respected critics found it imperfect, you tend to take that "perfect" review with a grain, no, make that a bushel of salt. (Jim A., you're not doing yourself any favours.)
-
-
NeuroticRampageApr 30, 20077This movie does have it's gaps in its story structure, as do most unexplainable or fantasy based scientific works. The idea standing behind this movie though is great, and if you give it a chance, you'll want to see how it unfolds. All in all, definatley worth at least a rent.
-
-
PnArdyPnArdyMay 13, 20079
-
-
NickA.Jun 2, 20073
-
-
ChristopherJ.Jun 3, 20074This film was ok, except that the end was a little unclear, and also the scientists are too easily influenced by the ATF agent. So if you really like "Hollywood reality", then this film will not disappoint you. If you like to watch sophisticated human dramas, this isn't for you.
-
-
TeeYouBeeJan 10, 20089
-
-
TCJan 15, 20080One of the worst film I've ever seen. Totally far-fetched with lots of stupid lines. Denzel Washington is just able to smile to make believe he is the good one but his smiles are just fake. Val Kilmer on the other hand is totally unexpressive and just on the movie to get the money. Maybe he knew that the movie was going to be pure shit.
-
-
thebossmeJul 14, 200810Interesting story line. Sci fi thriller that you should just enjoy instead of challenging the plausibility of time travel. Fun trying to determine exactly how many times he did in fact go back in time. Great performance by Denzel.
-
-
LassiterR.Nov 25, 20060
-
-
AgnesNov 26, 20060
-
-
RichardG.Nov 28, 20062Begins well enough, then spoils quickly with the "hero" turning into an irrational and selfish bully. The anti-science bias of the film doesn't help either.
-
-
LANCEDec 1, 20067Just saw the movie this evening. "Minority Report" type script set in todays times. Typical blow em up action movie with some clever writing and directing to tie up the loose ends in the plot(s). I rate it a B-
-
-
ElliotP.Dec 3, 20069Very well done sci-fi action detective thriller. I do not know what movie other reviewers watched because this is the best movie I have seen all season.
-
-
JustinG.Dec 3, 20068
-
-
CriticD.Dec 3, 20069
-
-
CarlieA.Dec 4, 20067It kept my attention and the ferry blowing up was very scary.
-
-
VictorR.Dec 4, 20060Deja phooey! Just a poor effort by all concerned. Nothing made any sense and the suspense was gone in about five minutes. Just kept looking at my watch waiting for it to be mercifully over. And when it does end it is forgotten the minute you walk out of your seat.
-
-
RasputinDec 5, 20060
-
-
BillyB.Dec 6, 20065This film just reminded me of so many time warping movies from the past and there is no new ideas in this movie prior to what they make you believe.
-
-
HassanDec 6, 20060
-
-
A.MartinezDec 8, 20062Whoa! Val Kilmer and Denzel Washington, great actors, but bad movie. It happens, I guess. The movie tries to make us think that they can bend time, but it tries too hard. The ending is ridiculous. I am not even sure that this is a rental!!!
-
-
FelixJ.Dec 8, 20079The beginning is pretty slow but after the laser pointer thing it gets really sweet. I love hollywood stuff! And Denzel.
-
-
KurisuD.Oct 30, 20074
-
-
JimA.Feb 23, 200710A perfect movie with good actors and a more than perfect scenario.
-
-
CartinM.Mar 16, 20077I'm sure that I've reviewed this film before. Anyway I recently saw this movie with my dear friend Allen (who by the way is the gravy king). We sat down together and prepared ourselves for the treat that is Denzel. I must say I wasn't dissappointed, intense action and 90 minutes of pure Denzel is enough for this man.
-
-
JimR.Mar 5, 20079
-
-
MarcT.May 14, 200710This is the best movie ive ever seen . Ive been interested in the phenominon but this movie takes it to the max. a Scientific breakthrough that lets us all escape reality for 4 and a half days . Completely wonderful, il watch it everyday
-
-
KhoaN.May 9, 20078This has nothing to do with biology but all about time travel. Some people have missed the point and think it's a crime thriller with a little splash of technology. Rather, it's a time travel movie, and if watched closely there are many times Denzel travelled back in time. If you haven't got that, and you have got nothing.
-
-
JohnHAug 18, 20077Entertaining and enjoyable movie. Final ending is weak.
-
-
LeeP.Feb 19, 20089Really enjoyed this film, got dragged along to see it by a friend, having no prior knowledge as to what it was all about but it really hit the spot. It puts a different twist on the well worn thriller genre and because you already know what will happen should Denzel fail it cranks up the tension throughout! Well worth a watch!!
-
-
R.LopezFeb 4, 200910
-
-
RobertxxxNov 22, 20065We've all looked at our watch during dull movies to see how much longer it's going to last--but after six minutes? this film stumbles from the start and never recovers; a silly time-capsule story that builds absolutely no suspense.
-
-
StevenC.Nov 23, 200610I really enjoyed this movie, It kept me thinking the entire time! My friend and I tried to figure it out the movie the whole time, and had a great time doing so. Great thinker movie, and if you dont like that watch it just for the fact of seeing Paula Patton( the leading girl opposit Denzel Washington)
-
-
CarolA.Nov 23, 20060One of the worst movies ever. No chemistry between the characters, tons of high tech gadgetry with more holes than swiss cheese. About an hour into the movie you stop caring and can't wait for it to be over. How this was ever made is biggest question of all. Denzel Washington now has the biggest bomb of his career. Don't spend your hard earned dollars on this turkey.
-
-
LadyfingerNov 25, 20060
-
-
MikeC.Nov 28, 20069Fabulous movie. Bring your imagination - but it's not as preposterous as some might think. (Who knows what the possibilities are over the next 10 years?) Well-acted. Caviezel makes a great evil adversary. Enjoyed every minute.
-
-
RodneyH.Nov 29, 20060
-
-
MichaelP.Dec 11, 20069
-
-
DerrickH.Dec 11, 20069This movie is great!! You must go to the restroom and get your food before watching this becasue you can not miss any parts of it. This movie is unpredictiable and keeps you alert. A must SEE.
-
-
PatrickL.Dec 12, 20060A film with no worth. It is the kind of movies they did in the 80s; science nonsense, tv screens, time-count downs, cheesy music, explosions. And who is that guy looking like a caricature of Val Kilmer? It was amazingly stupid and boring and cliched.
-
-
SidiotDec 17, 20060Absolutley a moronic movie without any character development and a plot that takes a walk off the pier. A couple more losers like this and Denzel loses his star power. The worst movie of his career.
-
-
KyleM.Dec 2, 20066
-
-
MichelS.Dec 27, 20067Not the best movie in the world, but if you are willing to ignore the sci-fi nonsense and let yourself be grabbed by the action, it's worth it. Suspense, romance and pseudo-science work together for a fun movie.
-
-
SueS.Dec 3, 20069Action-packed thriller!
-
-
FedUpDec 4, 20060Unadulterated garbage without any real suspense. Very poorly acted and directed.
-
-
howardp.Nov 24, 20076Good grade B sci-fi action fare. Denzel sleepwalks through the role. The chase scene on the highway was the film's high point. Very creative.
-
-
DaveL.Apr 24, 20073
-
-
MorganG.May 24, 20070This film sort of starts out slow. Then it takes it easy in the middle. And winds down towards the end.
-
-
AndyJul 21, 20071The film tries to portray realism while excluding logic and a basic understanding for science. Not to mention the movie sucks.
-
-
JudyT.Nov 22, 20066Deja phooey, this movie would have been more interesting if Denzel hadn't gotten interested in Claire. The surviellance and time stream were interesting. Everything was going well until Denzel's character started focusing on the girl. Just like Timecop the ending is for people who need happy ending and not something really interesting to ponder.
-
-
FantasyNov 22, 20060I find it difficult to believe that Denzel Washington an Academy Award winner would sign off on this lame production. If this were a free made for TV movie you would change the channel. It is too bad to be believed. No chemistry, no plot and no dialogue. Idiotic.
-
-
LarryN.Nov 24, 20068If you like SciFi, if you like action & suspense, and if you like Denzel, you are going to enjoy this film. Just came back from the theater with my wife, we went in cold not knowing anything about it except Denzel was in it (my wife is a big fan of Mr. Washington), I really had no expectations (did not think "Man on Fire" was all that great), but we both liked this film alot. LJN
-
-
LaughingS.Nov 25, 20060What the hell was Denzel thinking? The English Dictionary doesn't have an adequate word to describe how discombulated this truly was. Word of mouth will have this drek out of the theater within two weeks.
-
-
HoraceLokiteNov 25, 20060Who wrote this lame script and who approved it? Anyone who sat through this BS should get battle pay as that is how awful this is. Avoid like the plague.
-
-
ArtB.Nov 26, 20068
-
-
DonnyB.Nov 26, 200610What?? I am nothing less than shocked to read what the others have written. Great editing, storyline, and audio on top of that everything comes together like clockwork. What more could you ask for?? Bottom line..........Entertaining as hell!!
-
-
SandyS.Dec 19, 20062Really insipid - totally unbelievable even for sci-fi, with a clairvoyant detective (Washington of course) who is totally infallible and all-knowing. Never could get over the credibility problem and suffered greatly throughout this predictable melodrama.
-
-
Apr 21, 20126This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
80Cinema's natural felicities for time and action have seldom felt as beautifully dovetailed.
-
80Unlike the last Scott-Washington matchup, "Man on Fire," Deja Vu boasts a muscular, fast-forward story that won't be overwhelmed by Scott's need for speed in the form of rapid cuts and all that visual fusion that have become his stylistic trademark. Here, the approach is perfectly suited to the picture's time-shifting, multitasking structure.
-
70It's preposterous, but never dull: Scott whips the action into a taut, tasty lather.