User Score
2.3 out of 10

Generally unfavorable- based on 80 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 80
  2. Negative: 59 out of 80

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. BenJ.
    Oct 9, 2008
    10
    I'll never get tired of words like mangina, hebitch manwhore, so I liked this. Not really 10 just trying to compensate for all the haters, who really should be more careful about the movies they rent obviously.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. godzillai.
    Oct 2, 2005
    0
    If Alexender the Great defined the art of brutality to the highest level, this movie has some similarity; it defines the brutality of comedy movies to the highest level. The jokes are sick, uncanny, and made me choked! Mike Bigalow shows that he has a brain, but he does not know how to use it! He probably got this job because of his last name. Worst comedy movie of the decade, if not of all time!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. JimG.
    Dec 30, 2005
    3
    Seems there will always be a place for someone to make us laugh at (with?) stereotypes -- as long as we know the jokes are presented with self-awareness rather than spite. Evaluated based on artistic merit and contribution to intellectual curiosity -- 0; Evaluated on delivering what it promises (or what the informed viewer would expect) -- 6. So, hey, let's split the difference.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. groundfisher
    Oct 2, 2005
    4
    To the people here who are panning the movie with votes of zero - what did you expect from Deuce Bigalow European Gigalo? If you didn't know what you were getting into when you walked into the cinema, there is something wrong with you. Yes, the movie sucked. I expected it to suck. I was hoping for a few god-awful crude laughs, and I have to say the fart-joke was well executed. The movie is what it is and I could never score it high as it treats every subject it touchs upon so superficially, with shallow jokes, and no sustained humour. Since it's rated 'R', it might as well go all way but the moral restraint of the lead character holds everything back. It's rated 'R' - there's no need to do that. A movie unsure of it's own identity except during the most crass of moments and except during the most crap of love stories. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. MC
    Dec 1, 2005
    9
    Cant get any better then a Rob Schneider movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. LukeK
    Dec 1, 2005
    10
    Please this movie was way better then the first one it was more perverse and had better comedy then the first one could ever hope to. The thing that it was in Europe just made it even better with more jokes and all.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. AJ
    Dec 20, 2005
    0
    Painfully unfunny. A terrible movie. Waste of time and money.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. AdinaM
    Dec 20, 2005
    0
    Laborious to even sit through. Total trash. Has earned film history infamy as shining example of why most sequels are a waste of film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. MalcomM.
    Oct 24, 2005
    0
    I thought the first Bigalow: American Bigalow was a surprise comedy hit that hit the spot. But this second offering is a total surprise crap wonder! I just can't imagine what got into Rob's head when he agreed to do this. I thought he was one of the good buddy buddy kinda underdog actor/guy whom u can root for... Alas, success perhaps got he better of him??? I could have given this movie at the very least 1 out of 10, but when i heard the movie made my friend who paid to watch this rubbish as well got feverishly sick, I knew it was my moral duty to ass-slap Rob in the face and rate his Duece an utter 0! Please let there be no Deuce Bigalow: Brooklyn Gigolo! or someone's gonna seriously get hurt. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. mariom.
    Dec 5, 2005
    8
    It's one of the funniest movies we've ever seen.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. Josephine
    Aug 14, 2005
    0
    I think I want to puke?
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. mitchk.
    Aug 16, 2005
    10
    I thought this movie was hilarious! I love Rob Schneider! He's bananas!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. AtomicR.
    Aug 22, 2005
    0
    Horrible movie. At first I wondered why there were only 6 other people in the theater. 10 minutes into the movie, I found out why. This film was grotesque, void of any true humor, and had absolutely no plot whatsoever. A "0" in my opinion is too good for this half-assed film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. FRutgers
    Dec 20, 2005
    0
    Has to be the worst, phoned in sequel in years. Looks like they wrote it and shot it in a weekend.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. Mike
    Dec 8, 2005
    9
    After looking at the meta critics average score, I was prepare for the movie to be really bad! but to my suprise I actually loved this movie! very funny! go and see it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. Spriggangirl
    Oct 4, 2005
    0
    Disgusting,nasty,rude and horrible.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. Chris
    Aug 14, 2005
    0
    Probaly one of the worst movies out in a while, was rob scneider ever funny???
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. GlennM.
    Aug 15, 2005
    0
    The most cliche piece of garbage around. whats so funny about people who cant talk because of lung disease.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. AndrewR.
    Aug 25, 2005
    0
    Probably the worst movie I've ever seen. If America is the new empire, this movie is further proof that surely we are in decline. I felt dumber just watching it. If you go and don't have a chick with you that you plan on making out with for an hour and a half, you will have wasted your time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. JJHoldijk
    Aug 29, 2005
    0
    Worst. Movie. Ever. Period. I already didn't expect to much about this, though I was a little bit psyched about it. That's just because it's almost entirely recorded in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Being Dutch, I thought that was pretty cool. I hoped they'd make my (somewhat) beloved country look good, and not be too cliche about the city where i went to school, Amsterdam. But offcourse, just like almost every foreigner coming to the Netherlands always does, the makers of this "movie" probably spent a 2 weeks in coffeeshops, took their notebooks and laptops with them, and came up with a script. Sort of. I saw the results of their efforts last night, and 80 minutes later, I wasn't feeling that happy. Not that happy at all. It took them pissing and shitting Canadians, a tricked out boat, a woman with a penis for a nose and a lady with a blowhole in her throat(Before you ask; yes, she will meet the penis-nosed lady, and no, the result is not surprising). This combined with some of the worst Dutch actors this land has to offer(really, the Dutch accent in our English is horrible, but it won't -barely- make you want to rip of your ears.) resulted in the worst 80 minutes I spent watching a movie. 3 things that weren't too bad about this movie: - Hanna Verboom(she's hawt!!!) - the piss/s..tting Canadians - the word "prostidude." Now that's a funny word. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. KristenR.
    Sep 10, 2005
    0
    Total garbage. painfully unfunny. worst comedy of the year.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. JanB
    Sep 30, 2005
    0
    The only thing more upsetting than movies like this is that there are actually people who pay to see them.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. JackS
    Jul 26, 2007
    1
    A boring, unfunny piece of crap. The first movie was not too bad, but it did not need a sequel. This movie proves that it is so.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. MarcoM.
    Dec 10, 2005
    6
    Now I know this won’t make top 100 greatest films of all time! But it does not stop me from enjoying its crude humour and stomach turning scenes. Its an enjoyable comedy to watch with your friends.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. TommyB
    Dec 20, 2005
    0
    Agreed. This has to be the worst sequel of 2005, if not the last few years. So unfunny I wanted to scream, so boring I didn't have the energy to, so crappy I wanted poop on it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. wendys.
    Dec 20, 2005
    0
    ohmigod. i can't believe this ever even got made. off the grid horrible. totally wrong and not in a funny way at all.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. mikew
    Dec 20, 2005
    0
    pathetic, tasteless, just plain poor. a low point for Rob Schneider who i actually think can be quite funny, but the material he had to work with here was junk even for Deuce Bigalow standards. deserved to be endlessly mocked and made an example of for ripping off fans trying to cash in on the first movie. a disgusting effort.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. WesE.
    Dec 5, 2005
    0
    On par with hurricane Katrina as the worst American disaster of the year. Poor Rob Schnider.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. ClintH.
    Aug 11, 2005
    2
    I hope Rob Scneider stops making movies. He should be ashamed of himself.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  30. [Anonymous]
    Aug 11, 2005
    1
    This was afwul. I only watched it because I was forced.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. BrianR.
    Aug 13, 2005
    9
    Yes, the movie wasn't perfect, but it made me and everyone else in the theater laugh. It is not going to be remembered as a great movie, but it definitely serves as a great sequel.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. TomD.
    Aug 17, 2005
    0
    I'd rather drink a bottle of nail polish than see this again, even if I didn't have to pay again.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. AlyE.
    Aug 18, 2005
    0
    All I can say about this movie is this: At about 20 minutes into it, I walked out and got a refund.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. CoreyR.
    Aug 25, 2005
    10
    I thought this movie justifies my love of humanity. Rob Scheider's mangum opus promises much and it delivers like a Domino's delivery driver. I laughed so hard I peed in my pants. Apologies to anyone I hit with said pee, I hope they make a third one even if I have to pay for it myself. This movie is recommended for blind nuns and families with either really young children or grandparents addicted to rohypnol. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. KyleM
    Dec 16, 2005
    0
    This movie was just stupid. nothing funny about it. i agree with Wes E 100%.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  36. Nov 26, 2011
    5
    I thought it was a lot better then the first one. It was pretty funny and had a lot of hilarious moments. The plot isnt all that interesting, the acting is pretty average, and it can be a bit dull but it was still a decent comedy.
  37. Dec 31, 2011
    8
    I loved this movie. I am suprised that I did because I really wasnt expected much when I first started watching it but I laughed from start to finish. There were a few corny and cheesey parts to it but I still enjoyed it.
Metascore

Generally unfavorable - based on 25 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 25
  2. Negative: 17 out of 25
  1. While sloppier than the sloppiest of seconds, is laudable in one important regard: Its obsession with the male body.
  2. Definitely merits its R rating with a fearless approach that will earn genuine laughs as it turns a few stomachs. Yes, a Rob Schneider movie that's funny. Strange but true.
  3. 60
    As before, there are moments, when Schneider is turned loose to do his anything-goes, creepy-funny shtick, that are crudely inspired.