Metascore
34

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 18 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 18
  2. Negative: 9 out of 18
Watch On
  1. Reviewed by: Randy Cordova
    Jan 20, 2014
    70
    Although it won’t win any points for originality, it is a fast-moving little chiller filled with creepy atmosphere and convincing performances.
  2. Reviewed by: Drew Taylor
    Jan 17, 2014
    67
    If there's a problem that gets in the way of some genuinely scary moments, it's that the filmmakers (all four of them) don't ever give you enough information to invest in the characters.
User Score
2.5

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 63 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 25
  2. Negative: 16 out of 25
  1. Mar 2, 2014
    0
    An aweful movie. A GIANT WASTE OF TIME. A GIANT WASTE OF MONEY. A USELESS MOVIE WITH TERRIBLE EFFECTS. ITS JUST PLAIN STUPID. I DONT THINK IVEAn aweful movie. A GIANT WASTE OF TIME. A GIANT WASTE OF MONEY. A USELESS MOVIE WITH TERRIBLE EFFECTS. ITS JUST PLAIN STUPID. I DONT THINK IVE MET SOMEONE WHO ACTUALLY LIKED THIS MOVIE. Full Review »
  2. Feb 3, 2014
    0
    This is awful, everything is wrong with it the acting is bad, the scares are not scary, the premise is tired, and hammered to death a millionThis is awful, everything is wrong with it the acting is bad, the scares are not scary, the premise is tired, and hammered to death a million times, some people say it's Paranormal Activity meets Rosemary's Baby, and it is true, as this movie takes everything wrong with those movie, and multiplies that a million times, and creates **** Full Review »
  3. Jan 26, 2014
    8
    Pretty cool movie. Not very scary, and I'm really tied of this "found footage" trend in horror movies, but the acting was good and the effectsPretty cool movie. Not very scary, and I'm really tied of this "found footage" trend in horror movies, but the acting was good and the effects were nice. Full Review »