- Studio: DreamWorks SKG
- Release Date: Dec 15, 2006
User Score
7.3
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 220 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 160 out of 220
-
Mixed: 24 out of 220
-
Negative: 36 out of 220
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
MelissaM.Jan 13, 20074I can't believe the hype. I thought the movie was slow and boring! Without Jennifer Hudson it would only have lasted a week in the thearter. I was watching my watch to see how much longer I had to suffer through the film.
-
-
MikeC.Jan 22, 20071Why the critics like this movie is beyond me... Went with my wife and daughter, we all wanted to leave about 1 hour into the movie. This 2 hour movie seems more like 5 hours. Music sounds like they are singing the same song, over & over & over.
-
-
NadieFeb 11, 20073It started as a drama and ended as a musical. It started with one leading actress and ended with Beyonce. Looks like they change the director in the middle of the shooting. Some of the songs are really too long!
-
-
ConnieG.May 9, 20070Bad acting and bad music. Would have been a little better if they used the real songs done by the Supremes. Should have left the idea of a musical on broadway. I thought I was going to be watching a movie. Don't waste your time.
-
-
ScottY.Dec 13, 20064The film just does not live up to the hype. They've been calling this the film to beat at the Oscars and that just might be its downfall come February. Hudson is fantastic, however the music just didn't "sing".
-
-
FranklinC.Dec 25, 20063
-
-
HoraceDec 25, 20062If I want to see Jennifer Hudson sing I can attend her concert or watch it on video. As for the rest of this film there's very little to even come close to the Broadway show. Overhyped to the rafters.
-
-
LeonardP.Jan 11, 20072A badly conceived film musical by a truly un-talented director. Bad costumes, bad art direction, bad songs. The only reason to see this is for Eddie Murphy and Jennifer Hudson who do their best .
-
-
EnriqueJan 12, 20074Good performances and the movie has its moments, but becomes quite tedious after awhile. A real disappointment.
-
-
2roadsJan 10, 20073The actors did the best they could with what they had to work with. . . but all in all it was desperately missing the Weinstein brothers' touch of excellence.
-
-
KathleenO.Jan 15, 20074I saw the cast on Oprah and it was not made clear to me that this was a musical. I don't like musicals and the movie was ruined for me when they sang when I really, really believed the words should have been said.
-
-
MikeCJan 20, 20073Excruciating. The songs are so terribly cheezy making the movie an utter cringe-fest.
-
-
scottsJan 7, 20074Stunningly mediocre.
-
-
JB.Mar 14, 20072Great job Jennifer Hudson--bad script. I thought I would get my life back at the end of the Billy Holiday song. but noooooo like 8 more songs after that with "shaft music". Alot of the lights and props and computer graphics looked to be from 2000 also.
-
-
KevinG.Apr 15, 20071A black movie made for a white audience. Souless, corny, bad songs while lip singing. People who gave this a 10 have absolutely no taste. I lasted one hour because I plugged my ears most of the time. This was pure torture.
-
-
WilliamW.May 27, 20074The music and acting were good but the plot, script writing was terrible. I feel like I just wasted two hours of my life.
-
-
JanJDec 22, 20064Ugh - what a waste of time. Imagine your favourite R&B / soul / whatever processed for Broadway, then re-processed for Hollywood, mimicking the original stuff but of course never delivering it. If that wasn't irritating enough, every bit of dialogue is an opportunity for another round of overstrained singing, in the mode of Andrew Lloyd Weber productions. Avoid.
-
-
DougIDec 25, 20061
-
-
BobC.Dec 26, 20061The only good thing I can say about this movie is the costumes were good...other than that I want my 2 hrs of my life back.
-
-
keithb.Dec 28, 20061
-
-
chriswichJan 13, 20072
-
-
KerryD.Jan 16, 20070As a lover of soul and R&B for 40 years, this movie was a souless, pointless, gutless cliche from start to finish. How is it possible to have a musical without ONE GOOD SONG? I was ashamed for every actor in this piece of dreck. Save your money and go out and buy Smokey Robinson and the Miracles greatest hits
-
-
myselfandIOct 24, 20072
-
-
RodgerHDec 17, 20064
-
-
FedUpDec 24, 20061One is for Jennifer Hudson. As for the rest of this overhyped turkey it should be on the Thanksgving dinner table. Avoid.
-
-
BrookeC.Dec 27, 20061An absolute nightmare. Amateurish, bad acting and cliches abound in this bore-fest.
-
-
88This baby dazzles like nothing else anywhere.
-
80If there is a disappointment, it is this: The anticipation may have exceeded the realization. It's a damn good commercial movie, but it is not the film that will revive the musical or win over the world.
-
90Finally. After "The Phantom of the Opera," "Rent" and "The Producers" botched the transfer from stage to screen, Dreamgirls gets it right. Bill Condon's adaptation of the 1981 show about a Motown trio's climb to crossover stardom pulls off the fundamental double-act those three musical pics all missed: It stays true to the source material while standing on its own as a fully reimagined movie.