- Studio: New Line Cinema
- Release Date: Jun 13, 2003
User Score
3.4
out of 10
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 71 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 21 out of 71
-
Mixed: 9 out of 71
-
Negative: 41 out of 71
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
FantasyJul 4, 20030Dumb, Dumber, and now the Dumbest. Avoid at all costs, unless of course, you are a Dumbbell. Refund!
-
-
RaymondW.Feb 10, 20050This is movie is the worst comedy I have ever seen. It makes Meatballs 4 look soo funny you would die laughing. Who ever had the idea of having this movie made is a moron.
-
-
BrandonMar 21, 20040
-
-
VincentR.Jun 13, 20031
-
-
GigiCriticAug 21, 20036Come on, it was called Dumber and Dumberer, so what do you expect? It was good for some laughs, but it was pretty dumb like the title warns you. Stop making it seem like you expected it to be an award winning movie!
-
-
AbbyH.Dec 1, 200410You people R so mean when it comes to rating movies. I think Eric Christian Olsen & Derrick Richardson did an awesome job at playing the original Harry & Lloyd. NICE JOB!!!!!!!
-
-
VikramM.Apr 4, 20040
-
-
SaerB.Apr 9, 20042The most stupidest movie ever! There were a few laughs but this movie is so stupid! I hate it!
-
-
JoeM.Nov 17, 20050This movie was so unbelievably bad that it nearly destroyed the whole world and everything on it. After I watched it, I lay in a bombshelter for 8 days eating tin food.
-
-
PatHJun 29, 20056The only thing about this movie was the lackluster plot. Other than that, this movie was a stupid movie with many good laughs. Not like other comedies.
-
-
TylerNov 23, 20031At a loss for words. Well, not quite. Pathetic. The only reason it mustered a '1' rating is because my roommate wasted his money renting it and I didn't.
-
-
BrandonS.Dec 2, 20038
-
-
AdamE.Dec 2, 20035I know it's a really crappy film but I must admit it was sooo stupid I laughed my head off!
-
-
MoviesGreatJun 14, 20039FUNNY MOVIE!...not as good as the original but worthy of its name.
-
-
GiovannaC.Jun 17, 20035Eh, it was all right i suppose. yet vincent r's review was a bit harsh, and obviously if he found at least one scene hilarious, the movie warrants a higher rating than his pitiful one.
-
-
AnonomousguyJun 18, 20031This movie is a poorly made sequel that disgraces the first "Dumb and Dumber" movie which was quite funny. I am not very picky when it comes to comedies and I usually laugh at least a few times before the end. In this horrible excuse for a movie I did not even laugh once. I could go on and on listing all the bad things about this movie but I think you get the point.
-
-
FreddyO.Jun 18, 200310I don't think this was a bad movie at all. The critics were just all riled up about the first and how good it was. I must admit, the first was better, but if this was an independent movie it would have recieved a higher score from everyone. Forget about the first movie for one second and actually look at this one. Its really not that bad.
-
-
JosephC.Jun 19, 20035I think people are approaching this the wrong way. It had some genuinley funny moments, and I smiled at others. No, it wasnt the original, but hey, its all in good fun.
-
-
DerekW.Jun 23, 20034Seen better, seen worse. If you like slapstick comedy then see it. It's got some laughs, not as great as the first, but if you like the genre, I'm sure you'll like this movie.
-
-
EricY.Jun 23, 20035There were a few funny moments and very few boring moments...a worthy effort overall.
-
-
Tysono'macJun 25, 20035The dumb and dumber prequel had its moments, unfortunately they were few and far between. the movie was bad, but it wasnt good either. if youre thinking about seeing this in the theatre or even waiting until it comes to video/dvd, my suggestion is to wait until it eventually airs on tv.
-
-
ZachJun 28, 20036
-
-
SamL.Jul 11, 20030So TERRIBLE! Waste of time, money, and energy! This movie was worse than back to back episodes of Spongebob Squarepants! Eghhh!!
-
-
MattJul 15, 20031*Flush* whats that?! i think i heard a toilet flushing. must be this sh*tty movie.
-
-
[Anonymous]Jul 6, 20030
-
-
yayyyyyJan 19, 20040All i can say is its a good thing i told the guy i was under 11 and got in for 6$ instead of 14 bcus i wudnt have wnated to waste my money on such a pathetic,worthless,stupid sh.t.
-
-
MikeW.Dec 8, 20041This movie was just a sad joke, to somehow attempt a sequel (in this case a prequel) to the original Dumb & Dumber is completely idiotic. They could at least get Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels to revise their roles, without them the movie just falls apart at its seems.
-
-
blutoFeb 16, 20040U R kidding me. this movie suck a.. bug fu..ing time.
-
-
MickK.Apr 16, 200410This movie is a brilliant comedy because it has the word poo in it and i like the movie because it is just as funny as the original.
-
-
SarahMay 18, 200410Hilarious!
-
-
IanF.Apr 22, 20057I thought the film was very funny in a lot of places, if not quite unfunny in quite a lot of places. At times it is exceptionally funny. Whilst it is not as good or funny as the first film, it is still a funny film and most certainly doesnt deserve the slaiting it has got.
-
-
JustinC.Jun 16, 20058This movie is stupid....but very very funny.
-
-
GerrickC.Feb 12, 20071It's documented sequels are usually not as good as the first, and in the case of this movie, it could not be more obvious. In a followup to an already flop movie the sequel makes the first look smart. An abomination to movie sequels.
-
-
BrandenJun 15, 20032I gave it a 2 for the 2 talented actors(erik and derrick) and a fat zero for the movie.
-
-
TomL.Jun 29, 20036This movie was actually a lot more fun than i had originally expected. Olsen pulled it off as Lloyd. Although the movie didn't have the possibly funniest directors of all time,Peter and Bobby Farrelly, Troy Miller kept me very amused. Throw sophisticated humor out the window. I realized I laughed harder at more petty, unclean movies.
-
-
JacobR.Aug 13, 20030WTF? Watching a porn Moive is much more funner! BTW SpongeBob is cool! @ss Wipe
-
-
DecepticonPomOct 27, 20041I tried 3 times to watch this DVD and each time found that pulling skin from my fingers and making them breed caused me to laugh more. The dood who plays the Jim Carrey role was an immaculate likeness but he simply did not have the material to work with.
-
-
AlansitoKLOJun 17, 20040Just sad.
-
-
SeanBJul 15, 20043Some movies are so dumb and make no sense so they are funny. Dumb & Dumberer falls so far below being this type of film that it isn't. A few laughs here and there, but even you could have probably come up with a better script. Horribly done, but you might take liking if you laugh at stupid comedies. No where in the same universe as the first one.
-
-
ryanb.Jan 26, 20054
-
-
BonehoC.Apr 16, 20060So bad! I was trying to figure out who find most of the jokes funny. It's too inappropriate for children, too immature for adults. I saw it in my early teen years, and the whole time I was thinking, where's Jim Carry and Jeff Daniels. Then the credits came on and I realized what an awesome move those guys made in avoiding this.
-
-
JoelC.Nov 12, 20031
-
-
Aug 28, 20102with out carey and with out danials there is no movie . apparently hollywood didnt care and slaped together a half assed prequel that does no justice to the original. there where a moment or 2 where i laughed thats the only reason ill give this 2 points the rest was unbarable crap.
-
Oct 14, 20110This movie was so bad I stopped watching after 45minutes hoping it would get better. The story sucked, there was nothing funny, and the actors couldn't keep my attention. The first attempt at watching it made me fall asleep ... waste of time!
-
Sep 2, 20110
-
Nov 19, 20118If you are like me then you will like this kind of humor. I don't see how some people didn't laugh in certain parts. This prequel has some funny moments.
-
Feb 24, 20136
-
May 11, 20131
-
May 12, 20134
-
10To call it sophomoric would libel even the most pathetic, pimply underclassman.
-
20Levy, Luis Guzman, Cheri Oteri -- utterly wasted. At 82 minutes it feels longer than Lawrence of Arabia -- and a lot less funny.
-
25Long, lumbering and endlessly unfunny.