Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds Image
  • Summary: How far would you go to get the person of your dreams? In "Eating Out," Kyle (Verraros) convinced his straight roommate to pretend to be gay to get the girl. Now, with the help of Gwen (Hands) and Tiffani (Kochan), Kyle pretends to be heterosexual to land Troy (Marco Dapper), the new guy -- and nude model -- in town, only to find himself joining the campus ex-gay support group and nabbing a girlfriend! Kyles ex boyfriend, Marc (Chukerman), is horrified at the plan and decides to pursue the confused Troy with his own tactic -- being his out gay self. Who will win him first? In the boy eat boy, boy eat girl world of Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds (the first American gay sequel ever), stakes get raised, sexual boundaries are obliterated, and the answer is never what you might expect! Expand
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 9
  2. Negative: 3 out of 9
  1. Reviewed by: Phil Hall
    70
    The ultimate rarity: a sequel that is miles ahead of its predecessor in every imaginable department.
  2. 50
    This sequel, with the return of the first movie's insatiably slutty Los Angeles collegians, is as vulgar as its predecessor and just as almost-smart.
  3. A Rubik's Cube of shifting sexual orientation and elaborate sex fantasies, "Sloppy Seconds" gathers all the accouterments of soft pornography -- cheesy music, low-rent acting and attractively framed genitals -- into a plot of stunning imbecility.

See all 9 Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 15
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 15
  3. Negative: 11 out of 15
  1. ZodM
    10
    Hilarious movie. Saw it at Outfest and the laughter was so loud you couldn't even hear lines toward the end. A real crowd-pleaser, and a lot better than the original! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. It surpasses the first one, the jokes are way funnier and there are funny situations. With so much crap that the genre has been done lately that manages to surprise positively. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. Allenf
    1
    The best thing I can say about this is it's better than the first one. Why I wasted $11 watching it I've yet to determine.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes

See all 15 User Reviews