Metascore
39 out of 100

Generally unfavorable - based on 9 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 9
  2. Negative: 3 out of 9
  1. Reviewed by: Phil Hall
    70
    The ultimate rarity: a sequel that is miles ahead of its predecessor in every imaginable department.
  2. This video sequel to the gay comedy "Eating Out" (2004) is funnier, lighter, and faster paced.
  3. 50
    This sequel, with the return of the first movie's insatiably slutty Los Angeles collegians, is as vulgar as its predecessor and just as almost-smart.
  4. Reviewed by: Rob Nelson
    50
    As before, the fun is somewhat capped by absurdly stilted acting and daytime-soap-quality DV, but the nonstop sub-Araki glibbage is plenty peppy and so is Rebekah Kochan's ding-a-ling Tiffani, a dead ringer for 90210's Tori Spelling.
  5. Reviewed by: Robert Koehler
    50
    Sequel is no more than a cheapo campy goof, but this edition does contain a higher quota of laugh lines and an unsubtle message that efforts to make gay youth "go straight" is destined to fail.
  6. Eating Out 2 is sweet-natured, but like the first edition, lame and way too talky.
  7. A Rubik's Cube of shifting sexual orientation and elaborate sex fantasies, "Sloppy Seconds" gathers all the accouterments of soft pornography -- cheesy music, low-rent acting and attractively framed genitals -- into a plot of stunning imbecility.
  8. A soft-core sex comedy that keeps throwing out comic variations on the idea of the line between gay and straight sexuality.
  9. Reviewed by: G. Allen Johnson
    25
    A rollicking comedy for the gay niche that rarely rises above the level of a high school skit, Phillip J. Bartell's sequel to 2004's "Eating Out" is loaded with silliness and eye candy.
User Score

Generally unfavorable- based on 31 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 15
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 15
  3. Negative: 11 out of 15
  1. It surpasses the first one, the jokes are way funnier and there are funny situations. With so much crap that the genre has been done lately that manages to surprise positively. Full Review »
  2. AaronV.
    0
    I can get past the sloppy filmmaking but this movie just isn't funny at all.
  3. Allenf
    1
    The best thing I can say about this is it's better than the first one. Why I wasted $11 watching it I've yet to determine.