Metascore
55 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 34 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 17 out of 34
  2. Negative: 3 out of 34
  1. An intense Mel Gibson performance anchors this brutally effective crime thriller.
  2. Campbell's film offers not surprises, exactly, but craftsmanship and low, brute, cunning satisfactions.
  3. 75
    Perhaps the best compliment I can pay to his work in Edge of Darkness is that I wouldn't particularly want to see this movie with grumpy Harrison Ford starring instead. Welcome back, Mel.
  4. I don't see Edge of Darkness as a great movie, or a particularly exalted one, but I do see it as one made by people who know where the buttons are - and who know how to press them. Hard.
  5. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    75
    Though the experience is nerve-racking and cathartic under Campbell's skilled direction, musings on family and grief and Gibson's intense, but subtle, performance stay with us longest.
  6. His (Gibson) slow-burn fury keeps the movie going, but not enough to invest us in any justice beyond payback.
  7. Both the film and television project were directed by Martin Campbell. He creates a nice level of tension throughout, and there are a couple of legitimate shocks (including one jaw-dropper).
  8. 70
    Edge of Darkness is somewhat stylish, and it's intelligently made.
  9. A meathead revenge picture, but it's very satisfying. Director Martin Campbell, coming off "Casino Royale," has a style that's blunt and bruising.
  10. Reviewed by: Nick Pinkerton
    70
    Onscreen much of the time, thicker and more creased than you remember, Gibson can make this rather unshapely movie seem taut.
  11. 70
    An efficient, politically inert fantasy.
  12. 63
    Gibson's acting has deepened. Too bad his comeback vehicle springs so many leaks.
  13. 63
    Winstone's interaction with Gibson provides the movie with much of its interest. For the rest, it's a skillful exercise in CGI and standard-order thriller supplies.
  14. Reviewed by: Sam Allis
    63
    The movie's weaknesses include the overuse of grainy flashbacks of Craven's daughter as a child, and the conversations he has with her after she is gone. Both are tremendously moving ideas but eventually succumb to bathos from repetition.
  15. Reviewed by: Gene Newman
    63
    Apart from feeling misled by the trailers, it's a decent, middle-of-the-road adult thriller that competently goes through the paces.
  16. Director Martin Campbell does a nice job of creating suspense, and Ray Winstone stands out for his performance as a conflicted hitman.
  17. In Hollywood, all is forgiven if you can deliver the goods. On-screen, at least, there's little difference between this Gibson and the one we remember from earlier films like "Ransom" and "Payback."
  18. Reviewed by: Nev Pierce
    60
    An uneven, somewhat meandering thriller is given emotional pull by Mel Gibson's excellent comeback performance. The lethal weapon hasn't lost it.
  19. There's no room for such soul-searching uncertainty with Gibson. After a few rapidly ticked-off minutes of gloom, the mission is clear: Get the sons of bitches, and make 'em pay.
  20. They've shed all of the Brit-centric political aspects and updated it to make a riveting, pulse-pounding suspense thriller that really does keep you on 'edge.'
  21. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    60
    Campbell's topnotch production team yields predictably polished results, but the director's decision to revisit the late Troy Kennedy Martin's teleplay, finally, feels lacking.
  22. The movie isn't exactly full of twists and turns, but neither is it a long, hard slog.
  23. 50
    Considering the talent involved and the strength of the source material, there's no way Edge of Darkness should have been this disappointing. Part of the problem is a direct result of condensation - there's no way to cram six hours of the dense mini-series upon which the movie is based into about 110 minutes without paying a penalty.
  24. The larger shell game here is that Edge of Darkness is offered as a political thriller, but with real-world politics removed. What we're left with is a familiar mechanism for delivering a vicarious, violent, wish-fulfilment fantasy, with Mel in a familiar position, in the driver's seat, pedal to the metal.
  25. 50
    An odd duck of a thriller. Quiet, talkative, with the occasional explosion of violence, it has ghosts and characters philosophizing, quoting F. Scott Fitzgerald or blurting insensitive non-sequiturs.
  26. Feels like a movie that wants to bare its fangs, but only manages a mild gumming.
  27. 50
    Edge of Darkness is reasonably well executed, but its competence reeks of fatigue. Another dead kid. Another angry dad. Another day at the office.
  28. Reviewed by: Cliff Doerksen
    50
    Martin Campbell directed, displaying none of the flair that made his "Casino Royale" such a hoot.
  29. 50
    Quickly devolves into another showcase for Gibson's snorting-bull act, a routine he could happily have shelved during his time off.
  30. 40
    Edge of Darkness has the look and feel of a Brit film shot in America – it's all dark, boxy rooms with powerful white men in impeccable black suits discussing how to tidy up the minor mishaps of their game over brandy and cigars.
  31. Here most of the punishment is inflicted on the audience, which gets nailed to a cross of boredom.
  32. Edge of Darkness was one of the most enthralling, intricate and genuinely thrilling productions in the history of the small screen. The big-screen version--directed by Martin Campbell, who did the original--offers an example of why the studios' numbers often add up, and why, at the same time, so many of today's Hollywood movies leave us cool if not downright cold.
  33. 25
    A thriller boasting Mel Gibson's first starring role in eight years, elicits a gigantic wow -- as in ``Wow, does this movie suck!''
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 87 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 35 out of 44
  2. Negative: 4 out of 44
  1. Edge of Darkness had a lot going for it. It was Mel Gibson’s first lead role since 2002’s Signs. It was the director of Casino Royale (arguably one of the top bond films) and it was written by the guy behind The Departed and Kingdom of Heaven. So I was fairly excited to see this film but it just didn’t live up to its potential. First off, Mel Gibson is amazing, I don’t care what anyone says; he’s a great actor. Sure, he said some **** up **** when he was driving drunk, but who hasn’t said some weird **** while they were drinking. I’ve never been the guy the judge actors/actresses performances based on their personal lives, I’d watch a Lindsay Lohan movie if it didn’t look like a train wreck, I would never say no because she’s kind of a dumpster slut. I’ve always been a huge fan of Tom Cruise, and I even saw the Oprah thing live when it happened, which isn’t a coincidence really because I love Oprah! Anyways, Mel Gibson > most Hollywood actors these days. And even though there is nothing special about Edge of Darkness, he does a great job in the roll of the “Nothing to Lose” father hell bent on revenge. God I hate using the phrase “Hell Bent”, such an overused douche line. But then again so is douche… Maybe I’m just a douche hell bent on being a ****ty reviewer. The Story being Edge of Darkness is nothing new, not even close, you saw it 5 years ago in the Constant Gardner, and probably 80 times between now and then. A loved one gets murdered, and then the guy or girl tracks down the murder unraveling a huge mystery involving a huge corporate conspiracy. But there are some small moments that set this apart from other movies, my heart pounded a few times and I squealed like a little woman once or twice. All in all it was a decent watch but you definitely don’t want to purchase it, but if your like me and you head to the movie store every Tuesday to rent a new release then this is definitely your best choice since this is the week of Daybreakers and Legion which are both unsatisfactory on a grand scale. Full Review »
  2. I think it was great for Mel Gibson to be back in an action movie where AGAIN he is playing the role of a cop. He does a great job but i honestly have to say that the spark dies after the beginning and takes a while to come back. The first time i watched it i actually fell asleep which of course made me watch it again. Then i started to appreciate more about it and enjoy it a bit more. Full Review »
  3. This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view. edge of darkness is worth watching, even though the plot of the story has been used many times before this movie it stills delivers with some good acting (execpt the accents) and some timely plot twists. The only thing that bothered me was the flashbacks of his daughter and hearing her voice through out the movie some of it didnt make sense to me and the ending could have been better. Full Review »