User Score
6.0 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 17 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 17
  2. Negative: 4 out of 17

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. ChrisM.
    May 17, 2007
    0
    Very rarely do I turn something off before the end but was extremely tempted. The whole thing tries so hard it is painful. Bukowski's writing has got some merit, this film has none.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. PaulK.
    Aug 30, 2006
    4
    This is slow and nothing happens. There are no extraordinary performances either. Unless you're a diehard Dillon fan, skip it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. Trapper
    Jan 30, 2007
    0
    Absolutely the dullest/ monotone/ smoke/ booze/ ****ing movie of all time. Please--this movie was Grade E-.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. JacobsenT
    Jan 9, 2007
    2
    Awful Awful Awful movie. Don't pay money to see this, or even rent it. It is in no way inspirational like so many people are saying, it has no plot, and it is not funny at all. Nothing happens, and nothing is done in the film to make the nothingness unique.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. ChadS.
    Apr 19, 2007
    7
    When a man hits a woman, there's usually a second time. In "Factotum", it's one punch thrown by Henry(Matt Dillon), one thud on the floor by Jan the thud-maker(Lili Taylor). Unlike "Walk the Line"(the whitewashed biopic of country legend Johnny Cash), the filmmaker doesn't want to portray their iconoclastic subject(Charles Bukowski) as a saint; this is an indie, after all, "Factotum" needs street(or at least, Sundance street) cred. But surely Henry Chinaski is prone to more than one violent outburst if he's some unrelenting drunk who can't hold onto a job. No drunk just hits the bottle; he'll hit jukeboxes, glass windows, and the corporeal flesh of bar patrons and fifty-cent whores alike, especially the fifty-cent whores. "Factotum" is episodic; it's nothing more than a meandering anthology of the women Henry happens to be shacked up with as he lurches from bar to crappy job to bar. Lucid or not, Bukowski/Chinaski had enough clarity to write "Factotum", the memoir that is the basis for this agreeable depiction of the infamous poet laureate of the streets. Dillon is good, but not great as Chinaski; or maybe, the filmmaker is at fault; maybe, he fell into temptation to myth-make. In place of genuine angst and other degrees of implosive behavior, he chose to uphold the romantic notion of a writer victimized by stampeding pink elephants; the pachyderms of proof. The elephants need thicker hides. Chinaski needs to be more tortured; more "Bukowski-in-a-china-shop"-like. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. KurtL.
    Sep 17, 2006
    9
    Matt Dillon is brilliant if not a little too pretty for the role. I like the different techniques used by the director to affect meaning. It’s definitely a more literary approach to film which is so refreshing these days. Funny and sad simultaneously.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. CathyL.
    Oct 15, 2006
    0
    This is the second worst movie I've ever seen.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. MattD.
    Aug 18, 2006
    10
    An Excellent cinimatic achivement with brave and breaktrough acting from the honest actor Matt Dillion. A phenomenal cast and a instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. DaveD.
    Aug 18, 2006
    10
    a excellent film in every way. supurb job by nervous new man matt dillion. He is still young in his carrer and this could be him at his best. A great story about a average american man who does not care about anyone but himself but eventually learns an importat life lesson that will warm your heart and inspire you. A all together insperational brilliant film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. JanDC
    Aug 24, 2006
    10
    Like it's been said, "writers cannot be successful if they're unwilling to let their hair hang loose and explore to achieve their best and ultimate inspirations! Indeed, a great stark and hilarious film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. AlexanderC.
    Aug 28, 2006
    10
    Another cult classic to add to the long list of cult classics from Matt Dillon, undoubtedlly the only icon of his generation and one of the best actors today. The film is ironic, cinic and crude and yet also beautiful, human and funny, simple and complex at the same time. True to Bukowsky's soul and one of the best films of the yaer. A little jewel.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. ThomasM.
    Sep 17, 2006
    5
    The acting is all top-notch, but this is a film that goes absolutely nowhere. Maybe that's the point, but if we are to be expected to remain awake throughout the films 94 minutes, some further revelations about this character might be in order. After 10 minutes, I knew everything about him that I was going to know. The rest was simply wallowing in the fetid path of this nearly moribund character. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
Metascore

Generally favorable reviews - based on 25 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 21 out of 25
  2. Negative: 0 out of 25
  1. 80
    Bukowski had a bunch of none too kind things to say about "Barfly" upon its release in the 80s, but, with Factotum, he'd do plenty of bitching and moaning as well, but deep down, Hank would approve.
  2. Matt Dillon is pitch-perfect as Bukowski's alter ego Hank Chinaski.
  3. Reviewed by: Leslie Felperin
    60
    Arguably one of the best adaptations of Bukowski's work, even compared with Bukowski's own script for 1997's "Barfly," deadpan timing and ace perfs bring out the morose humor and surprising warmth in the often miserabilist scribe's voice.