I would have given this a higher rating if the film itself wasn't so dark and depressing. The subject matter was very provocative, but most of the characters seemed rather lifeless. I think this was intentional, but it made for a less-than-engaging viewing. I was surprised by all of the cameos: Bruce Willis, Patricia Arquette, Ethan Hawke, Kris Kristofferson, and Avril Lavigne! I learned quite a bit about the immigration problem in this country and for that, this movie is recommended-- but be prepared for a downer!… Expand

I can't believe I paid $4.71 at Blockbuster to rent this excuse for a movie. And I can't believe I watched the entire thing. Nothing in this movie felt seemless. Most of the storylines are left completely undone--in an annoying way, not a contently ponderous one. (Did Raul take the meth? Did the cows ever get out of the fence?) There are just too many things going on. What's-her-face decides to be an "individual", but all she really becomes is part of the whiny hippy crowd with squeaky-voiced Avril Lavigne who recites the obvious complaints about the powers that be. Redundant, boring. Every scene was too long and I absolutely hated the soundtrack. Also, why was the focus on MANEUR in the burgers the whole time? There are so many other thing wrong with factory farming. I feel like the bloody scene at the end was supposed to make up for lack of story in an "artsy" way. Instead, it ended up being irrelevant except for the gag reflex. Overall, I hated this movie and I want a refund. Then, I want to give my refund to Morgan Spurlock, who truly deserves it.… Expand

I don't think I've ever seen a more jaded piece of garbage in my short life. Written as if by a would-be activist who considers himself very clever for managing to address every single contemporary crisis in American society; from immigration, to figuring out what to do with our life, to corrupt organizations, to animal rights, and of course the global environmental crisis. The film became so convoluted with attempted themes that none of theme seemed to matter in the least. They were badly addressed, on-the-nose and didactic, failing to bring any real understanding or insight to any of the causes that were so obviously far from the filmmaker's hearts. Makes me want a hamburger.… Expand

Possibly one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It is bad on two levels: the first is that the movie does not deliver its message well, and the second is that its message is bad.

To say that "Fast Food Nation" plays like a John Sayles film is too easy. There also seems to be a sly nod to Spike Jonze's "Adaptation", which isn't all that crazy since the Eric Schlosser expose on the fast-food industry is a plotless non-fiction book that's about as problematic to adapt as Susan Orleans' "The Orchid Thief". The sex and nudity in "Fast Food Nation" caught me off-guard in the same way that Judy Greer's topless scene in the Spike Jonze film did. It just seems flat-out gratuitous. To me, the inside joke(or unintended inside joke) of "Fast Food Nation" is the notion that John Sayles has a twin(like Charlie has Donald Kaufman), and this twin, let's call him Rex, wants the Mexican immigrants to be more sexy. What Ana Claudia Talancon(her scene is erotic) and Catalina Sandino Moreno(her scene is degrading) are asked to do is surprisingly graphic.… Expand

I thought it would never end... How boring. I was entertained for a while, but got tired of the movie. Don't waste your time.

Any book or video that exposes corporations as totalitarian top down non-democratic highly subsidized immoral institutions must receive some merit for their input toward social responsibility. This film hints at this concept. However, there is no question that the book this film is based on deserves substantial recognition for the effectiveness of clarifying this terrible reality of corporate interference that bleeds into society like an unseen plague. Just the one fact highlighted in the book, not mentioned at all in the movie, that details how the corporate sector has gone from advertising on the sides of busses to editing and providing school books that 'compromise' topics of health when fast food is mentioned should be enough to frighten the general population into learning much more about these parasites. The film is a terrible attempt at portraying anything near the value of the book, but like I said, any hint or mention of the nasties that go on because of the highly concentrated power in the corporate sector is worth something. My main suggestion is to please read the book. After that read another and another. Any book of any lean, right-left-middle, doesn't matter since learning is the reason for reading. Television and mass media, your own newspaper, all market what they want you to become by providing highly censored content. Books are usually written by passionate people with real purpose behind their concerns for society, just like Eric Schlosser's Fast Food Nation - the book, not the movie.… Expand

I don't know how to feel about this film. [***spoilers***] I like the idea of delivering the substance of the book to the screen through dramatization. But unless you root for the film to succeed, the execution is distracting. First: If, like me, you haven't read the book, the film will read it to you. A generous person would imagine this as recitative, and find it charming. To a more demanding audience, it reveals itself quickly and is instantly annoying. The characters are as multidimensional as is possible given the time in which their story is told.… Expand

Very well made film which provides intriguing arguments about the meat-processing industry in this country. However, it's more than just the beef industry. This industry is emblematic of the corporate machine that is all too powerful in this day and age with all the lobbying power in washington. Can one person save the system or has the machine become too powerful for anyone to resist? It seems to take a more pessimistic view on the issue although it may be a "realist view".… Expand

This film makes "Supersize Me" look like the lightweight it truly is. From the opening sequence it is clear that the fast food health issues visible to most consumers are just the tip of the iceberg lettuce, as the camera shows us cattle herds that threaten the ecology and public health, exploited undocumented workers losing their limbs and sexual autonomy in sped-up, infected slaughterhouses, and cynical corporate officials who find a way to cover it up and make it all pay. Certainly director Linklater owes a great debt to John Sayles' film "Lone Star," as well as to Stephen Frears' "Dirty Pretty Things," inasmuch as he has shown the interweaving of lives at multiple levels of the de facto race, class, nationality and corporate hierarchies, and yet has nonetheless managed to give his characters the depth and respect they deserve instead of representing them as cardboard stereotypes a la the film "Crash." The message of this film is that unaccountable corporate hierarchies must not be entrusted with decisions that affect the conditions of labor, justice and public health for entire communities of people. If you don't like that message then you are drinking the Kool-Aid that is killing the organic, cooperative systems that underlie everything that works in this world.… Expand

This is a great movie that comments on a reality that most people prefer to ignore. I understand why many viewers hate it. It is depressing and sometimes horryifing. Certainly not for everyone.

Richard Linklater's misshapen interpretation of Eric Schlosser's rigorously researched best seller that blows the whistle on Ronald McDonald and his ilk may not be the worst movie of the year per se (Poseidon, The Black Dahlia, Lady in the Water, The Sentinel and You, Me and Dupree just put up too tough a race), but if there were a special designation for 2006's most ineffective film, this would win it in a walk. The wildly prolific and uneven Linklater, who in the last four years brought us the lovely, sublime Before Sunset, the visually striking A Scanner Darkly, the solidly entertaining School of Rock and the totally unnecessary Bad News Bears remake, makes (with not only Schlosser's blessing but also his co-participation) a fatal mistake that dooms it from square one: instead of molding Schlosser's material into the powerful documentary it should've been, Linklater turns it into a ponderous, lumpy, frequently inept and painfully dull work of fiction! It's a tragic shame, because Schlosser's work eviscerates not only the fast food industry but the culture that allows and encourages it to thrive in so many different ways that it cries out for a Michael Moore, Robert Greenwald or Errol Morris to do it justice. In doing so it would almost surely have been a far more effective indictment than Morgan Spurlock's overrated Super Size Me, which suffered from too many specious or dishonest arguments (let's face it, you can get a hair in your burger at any restaurant in town, not just McDonald's) but an idiotic premise and "hook" (anybody who's stupid enough to eat nothing but Golden Arches food for a month when there are affordable alternatives is of course not only guaranteed to get sick but almost deserves to!) To Schlosser's credit (and admittedly Linklater's) he asks us to look at our dining choices altruistically rather than merely out of a selfish concern for our health; while he has much to say about the impure elements that make it into Quarter Pounders in the factory (and that also occasionally make it ONTO them in the restaurant as well, depending on just how disgruntled your local servers happen to be) he also arouses our compassion and concern for the inhumane treatment both of the cattle that are used and of the immigrant labor who are more or less treated LIKE cattle. Linklater makes the miscalculation of, rather than SHOWING us much of this, having various guest actors mostly look at the camera and TELL us about it; he saves the gut-wrenching visuals until nearly the end, but given just how surprisingly wooden and amateurish most of his capable cast is here (except Maria Full of Grace's Catalina Sandino Moreno, who has some heartwrenching wordless moments) it's doubtful that much of the audience will be awake at that point to watch. (For all its faults, Super Size Me certainly wasn't boring!) Schlosser's book is this generation's parallel to Upton Sinclair's 1906 expose of meat-packing practices in urban Chicago, The Jungle; Sinclair always regretted that, for all the changes his book and its uproar forced upon the industry, that the public didn't see the bigger picture Sinclair intended and embrace socialism (or at least reform the more heartless aspects of capitalism). Any movie in which a group of high school kids (including a fast food employee) engage in an endless scene of agitprop chatter unpleasantly reminiscent of the worst campus-protest movie of 1971 before deciding to stick it to The Man by freeing a herd of cattle, and the main audience response elicited isn't solidarity or even sympathy with their cause but rather irritation at their naivete in wondering why Bessie and Elsie stay right where they are and DON'T make a break for it isn't going to come anywhere near achieving either Sinclair's or Schlosser's greater or lesser aims. In fact, it's emblematic of Fast Food Nation's total failure in communicating its arguments that less than 48 hours after seeing it, I bought and ate a Big Mac and fries...and the irony didn't even occur to me for several MORE hours!… Expand

Easily the most BS movie I've seen all my life and not far from the worst. A complete and utter hypocrisy of a movie, it tries to make up for it's lack of a plot and a message by throwing cameos and shoving products in your face at every opportunity. Should be shown at film schools all around the world under the premise of 'How not to make a movie'.

This film makes "Supersize Me" look like the lightweight it truly is. From the opening sequence it is clear that the fast food health issues visible to most consumers are just the tip of the iceberg lettuce, as the camera shows us cattle herds that threaten the ecology and public health, exploited undocumented workers losing their limbs and sexual autonomy in sped-up, infected slaughterhouses, and cynical corporate officials who find a way to cover it up and make it all pay. Certainly director Linklater owes a great debt to John Sayles' film "Lone Star," as well as to Stephen Frears' "Dirty Pretty Things," inasmuch as he has shown the interweaving of lives at multiple levels of the de facto race, class, nationality and corporate hierarchies, and yet has nonetheless managed to give his characters the depth and respect they deserve instead of representing them as cardboard stereotypes a la the film "Crash." The message of this film is that unaccountable corporate hierarchies must not be entrusted with decisions that affect the conditions of labor, justice and public health for entire communities of people. If you don't like that message then you are drinking the Kool-Aid that is killing the organic, cooperative systems that underlie everything that works in this world.… Expand