Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 25 Critics What's this?

User Score

Mixed or average reviews- based on 125 Ratings

Your Score
0 out of 10
Rate this:
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • Starring: , ,
  • Summary: This sequel to the hit 2000 supernatural thriller finds Clear Rivers (Larter), the only survivor of the crash of Flight 180 left alive, Locked away by her own choice in the perceived safety of a psychiatric hospital. Clear now lives in constant terror that Death is coming to claim her, as it did all her friends. (New Line Cinema) Expand
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 25
  2. Negative: 12 out of 25
  1. Reviewed by: C.W. Nevius
    Funnier than the original.
  2. Reviewed by: Richard Harrington
    Can't wait for the next sequel . . .
  3. It ain't art. But as a cinematic house of horrors, it more than fills the bill.
  4. Reviewed by: Robert Koehler
    Suffers from the same rancid dialogue and acting problems as the original but with a much funnier pulse. The real progenitor here is less the previous pic than the sick-funny horror cinema of George Romero.
  5. Alas, the laughs - courtesy of screenwriters J. Mackye Gruber and Eric Bress and director David R. Ellis - are unintentional.
  6. 30
    I wasn’t much scared by anything in Final Destination 2 which is silly and illogical.
  7. Reviewed by: Justine Elias
    This risible thriller is merely a sadistic series of misread premonitions and vile murders.

See all 25 Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 27 out of 47
  2. Negative: 9 out of 47
  1. Mar 1, 2014
    A good instalment to the franchise. Not the best actors but still a great gory horrifying movie that will leave you wondering if you will still be safe in your own home Expand
  2. Aug 10, 2011
    A slight step up from the original. Well acted and a more developed plot helps redeem the status of the Final Destination franchise. The thing that makes this film stand out more then the original is that it has a clear beginning, middle and end. More mystery better deaths and higher production value. It's a pretty good cliche horror film. Expand
  3. Sep 2, 2014
    50th review!

    I thought this movie was superior to its predecessor in almost every way. It had better acting, cooler death sequences, and a
    more intriguing plot. It's a bit contrived in some of its plot elements, and the bickering between characters from the first movie is a problem here as well. If you're a fan of the first film, you will enjoy this film even more. Expand
  4. Nov 18, 2010
    I found the movie quite entertaining. I would give it a 10 just for the crash scene in the beginning of the movie, which must be THE best crash scene ever done, seriously. I guess it would have been better not to have seen the first one, because this one is pretty much a copy, but still, it is entertaining. Which serves the purpose. It even contains several memorable scenes - how many movies can you name that contain scenes where people say "Yes I remember that" ? So, it was good value for the money. Expand
  5. Oct 9, 2011
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Final Destination 2 it's not as good as the first one but it is still pretty good i mean Ali Larter return as claire and this movie has probably the best accident in the whole series. But it's not bad but i still recommend the first one Expand
  6. Mar 19, 2013
    First of all, the opening scene was awesome but that doesn't mean the movie is awesome. The three flaws were that some of the characters were really cliched and at times it was utterly predictable and sometimes even boring. The worst Final Destination of them all. Expand
  7. Sep 15, 2014
    One of the weakest horror movies, nothing in the film works it is a complete misfire.

See all 47 User Reviews


Related Articles

  1. 15 Movies the Critics Got Wrong

    15 Movies the Critics Got Wrong Image
    Published: June 14, 2010
    The critics can't get it right every time. We have searched our database for 15 poorly-reviewed movies that, upon closer examination, are much better than reviewers originally suggested.