User Score
7.9 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 19 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 19
  2. Negative: 1 out of 19

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. JadiannahL.
    Mar 19, 2006
    10
    If there are certain types of movies you are drawn to yet you occasionally step out of the norm to see. This is a great movie to do so with. Giving an awarg winning performance now that he's finally been given the chance, Vin Diesel has a versatile gift to portray anyone he wants. I applaud you Mr. Diesel. Thank you Sidney for giving him the chance to prove to those who said "No, he can't" that "Yes, he can.... act." Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. JimG.
    Jul 1, 2006
    3
    Stereotypical mobster movie from a different angle - draws in stereotypical mobster film actors. Yeah, based on real story, but same old stuff.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. NedF.
    Mar 16, 2006
    5
    Reasonably good acting and dialogue help tell this unusual, "based-on-true-events" story. Ultimately, however, this courtroom drama suffers, because although apparently none of the characters in the film has any idea what the jury will decide, the audience has had two hours of clues lopsided in one direction, not from courtroom evidence as much as from the dramatic structure.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. cybrswt
    Aug 1, 2006
    8
    This was a good movie, I really liked the story and the acting in this.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. ChrisF.
    Mar 19, 2007
    8
    I don't get the complaints about this film. What seems to get lost among viewers is these are not nice guys. You are not suppose to root for them. That being said the film is framed by Peter Dinkage's character and the DA. One talks about be a nation of laws and the other screams when he hears that one of the jury thinks Jackie is cute and reminds us all that they (Jackie and his buddies) kill people. There is no moral judgement made by this movie. You have to figure it out for yourselves. I will take a film like this every time. Disel and Dinkage are both excellent. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. PatcatL.
    Mar 27, 2008
    10
    One of the best movies since Good fellows. How did you get from the Brunos to the Lascees. I took a cab!!! I almost fell over laughing. I love the part on how Judge Fienstien and Jackie build a Bond, I love the part on how the judge handles Jackies Mothers death, I hope all judges would show respect and compassion as judge Fienstein showed Jackie. I give the movie two thumbs up!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. KenG.
    Mar 24, 2006
    4
    I honestly don't know who I was supposed to root for here. Obviously, I wasn't supposed to root for the D.A or the cops, who hardly come off well (or competent). Was I supposed to root for the real life mafia guys, who no doubt belonged in prison? If any of these guys were fleshed out and made interesting, then that might of worked, but only their leader (other then Diesel) was the least bit fleshed out, and he didn't come of well. Was I supposed to care whether or not Diesel is found guilty? The guy is already serving a 30 year-prison sentence. What possible effect could a conviction have on his life or future? Maybe, it would have worked if Diesel's antics were really as funny as film tries to convince us they are. We certainly had enough scenes of the people in the court rolling on the floor with laughter, I however didn't come close to laughing. Basically, this comes off as movie trying very hard to convince us that Diesel's character is alot more interesting then he is, at least in the moviie. Considering that the real life character he was playing was in the mafia, and spent a good part of his adult life in prison, the real life person might well have been a darker, and more interesting character then Diesel, who wants nothing more then to hang with his mafia buddies, who we are told again and again that he loves. Are we really supposed to share Diesel's view that the mafia guys are noble, working class heroes, and that their acquittal, if it comes, would be a victory for the little guy? The way film handle's its ending it certainly seems like we're supposed to see it like this. The filmmakers had a taken on this subject matter, that for lack of a better word, is just weird. However, Dinkage, as the defense lawyer is good. He is easily the best part of movie, and if his character had been the film's focus, then you might have had a better film. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. MarkB.
    Mar 28, 2006
    8
    Octogenarian Sidney Lumet's latest courtroom movie (based on real-life events and raiding actual transcripts for much of its dalogue) doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same series of breaths as his two genre-defining classics Twelve Angry Men and The Verdict. In classic Roger Corman/ Larry Cohen low-budget fashion, the non-courtroom scenes appeared to have been shot inside somebody's house. The courtroom scenes are lit in such a way as to suggest thaty the film stock somehow got left outside in the sun for several days. And whether Vin Diesel let his hair grow or is wearing a rug, his foliage looks only slightly more convincing than what the Hair Weave guy used to wear when he used to break into the Late, Late Show at 3 AM. So why is Find Me Guilty nevertheless so compulsively enjoyable? Largely because its central character, Jackie DiNorscio, a deeply flawed but strangely endearing mob goombah (a working stiff similar in some ways to Al Pacino's character in Donnie Brasco, only with a lampshade on his head) who demonstrates Stella Dallas-like loyalty to his "family" during an incredibly lengthy courtroom trial, is, as played by Diesel, so unforgettable. When playing amoral action figures, as in the Pitch Black movies, Diesel can be well-nigh unbearable, but when allowed to display an innate sweetness, as in Saving Private Ryan, The Fast and the Furious, and (apologies in advance) The Pacifier, Diesel is irresistably likable and funny. Of course, every great comedian needs good straight men, and as opposing attorneys, Linus Roache and Peter Dinklage more than fit the bill, while Ron Silver delivers a wonderfully subtle portrayal of a by-the-book judge who nevertheless comes to care about, respect and even sort of admire DiNorscio. There are certainly some ethical qualms involved with a movie that in essence manipulates its audience into rooting for a bunch of gangsters and thugs to beat the rap, but on the other hand, Find Me Guilty (like Twelve Angry Men and The Verdict) works as well as a training aid for future legal professionals as anything else: while it may be initially true that the man who acts as his own lawyer has a fool for a client, it's even more true that Diesel's DiNorscio innately understands something very important that nobody else in the courtroom seems to grasp: if a jury is being forced to slog through two years of seemingly endless testimony, one of the most effective ways to gain their favor is to KEEP THEM ENTERTAINED. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
Metascore

Generally favorable reviews - based on 27 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 22 out of 27
  2. Negative: 0 out of 27
  1. 63
    Sadly, Lumet's skill at bringing out the juice in actors isn't enough to save the film from overkill.
  2. All the acting is solid including a knock-'em-dead single scene by Annabella Sciorra as Jackie's ex-wife.
  3. Reviewed by: Eddie Cockrell
    70
    Part mob-trial thriller, part "dese 'n' dose" extended standup routine, character-rich pic plays like vintage Lumet, mining the grim comedy from life-and-death legal wranglings in the manner of "Dog Day Afternoon," "Prince of the City" and "The Verdict."