- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
38All of this is interesting, but not all that entertaining.
-
30One of the most undermotivated plots in many a moon, the zero-wit, zero-gravity misadventures of Nat, I.Q. and Scooter are embarked on merely because they're bored on their garbage dump.
-
30The little heroes and their families are surprisingly ugly, with faces resembling skulls, and the colors are so faded and muddy the movie feels tired and bungled.
-
25The vocal characterizations aren't the problem here; the script and the animation are the problems, and in feature animation, you can't arrange more significant problems than those.
-
25A tribute to a giant leap for mankind feels like a clumsy shuffle backward for animation.
-
25The film still suffers from cheap plasticky design, a klutzy overall look, dim preschooler humor, and a nearly impact-free story that thinks it's clever when it steals cues from 2001.
-
20Forgive us for being demanding, but shouldn't an animated kids movie like this one be, at the very least, fun? Cute? Watchable?
-
20Adding to weirdness is a tacked-on, live-action appearance from the real Aldrin, who reassures kids and terrified X-Files fans that there weren't, in fact, any houseflies on board Apollo 11.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 0 out of 5
-
Mixed: 0 out of 5
-
Negative: 5 out of 5
-
EnzoP.0
-
ArielleF.1Hollywood should just stop making G rated animated movies. Period.
-
eded0