- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: Aug 2, 2002
User Score
4.9
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 8 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 4 out of 8
-
Mixed: 1 out of 8
-
Negative: 3 out of 8
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
ChadS.Aug 15, 20027
-
-
DavidM.Aug 5, 20023Its bad, pretty bad. Wonder if this movie would make half as much without the "big" names associated with it. Skip it, and move on.
-
-
MichaelF.Aug 5, 20029
-
-
JkasoundAug 4, 20025Sometimes forgets where it's going until it gets kicked back on track by any member of the talented cast. Maybe not consistent but funny and introspective.
-
-
IanWatkinsonJan 17, 20041Boring, pretentious twaddle. The only redeeming feature of this film, is that you wonder how the hell they duped Julia Roberts into doing it.
-
-
GilbertNov 22, 20027....Yeah. Well, I see where he's coming from...but he only partially succeeds. Still, partially is enough to make it watchable.
-
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
70The movie remains fragmented, elliptical and overplotted to the point of being hard to track. Still, it's worth hanging in for the finish, a birthday party for Gus (David Duchovny), the producer of the film and the one person they're all linked to. Then Soderbergh pulls off a delicious trick, a gesture of pure, tender, unabashed movie love that makes up for everything.
-
50Far from a great film, but it certainly stretches the envelope.
-
30Fails because it takes itself so seriously, and because it is itself so seriously dull. Soderbergh's straining to give us a wink -- come on, guys, this is fun -- but really it just feels like some awful eye twitch -- a spasm of yawning self-indulgence in a mostly captivating career.