Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
Furry Vengeance
Furry Vengeance Image
See the trailer
Metascore
23 out of 100

Generally unfavorable - based on 21 Critics What's this?

User Score
2.6 out of 10

Generally unfavorable- based on 32 Ratings

Your Score
10 out of 10
Rate this:
  • Starring: Brendan Fraser, Brooke Shields
  • Summary: A live action family comedy in which an ambitious young real estate developer, Dan Sanders, faces off with a band of angry animals when his new housing subdivision pushes too far into a pristine part of the wilderness. Led by an incredibly clever raccoon, the animals stymie the development and teach our hero about the environmental consequences of man's encroachment on nature. (Summit Entertainment)… Expand

Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 6 out of 21
  3. Negative: 15 out of 21
  1. Empire
    Reviewed by: David Hughes
    60
    Goofball fun that will have kids - big and small - rolling in the aisles.
  2. St. Louis Post-Dispatch
    Reviewed by: Joe Williams
    38
    The message that needs to be posted at the theater door is "No trespassing."
  3. Orlando Sentinel
    Reviewed by: Roger Moore
    38
    On the sliding critter-comedy scale, Furry Vengeance falls somewhere between the Chipmunks and the Chihuahua (the one from Beverly Hills).

See all 21 Critic Reviews

User Reviews

Write a Review
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 17
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 17
  3. Negative: 12 out of 17
  1. s1rude
    7
    If you see a trailer for this and then decide to see it, what did you expect, exactly? It's low brow, but Fraser does well with physical comedy and some of the bits are laugh out loud funny, the participants are having so much fun it's contagious and, come on, the real message here is that loving families should be respected and valued - what's wrong with that?… Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  2. SebaW.
    5
    The movie was good but the actors suck.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. DavidB.
    3
    We're all adults here. We can agree that it's not a good movie - not even in the typically grating children's genre - but with all the critical bashing going on, I think we should take a moment and focus on who is to blame. It's not Brendan Fraser (who is amazingly committed to even the worst moments of this anemic movie), it's most likely not the writers (credited or otherwise, as there were probably no less than a dozen on this thing - it's been listed on IMDB for at least 5 years), it's not even the editor (who should be given an award for having to sit through who knows how many cuts of what he knew was an unsalvageable film), or anyone else in the cast or crew who, I'm guessing, did it to feed their families. The blame for this and every other painful excuse for entertainment lies with the studio and producers who are there from day one and shepherd it through to fruition. Their sole purpose is to make a product that they believe will make money. Yes, the director should also shoulder the blame of course, but in the end (unless the director is some genius auteur who is afforded final cut) it's the people whose logo is proudly displayed before the first frame of the movie that should be called out by name and forced to apologize for wasting our time. Then again, if we didn't have these movies, we wouldn't appreciate the good ones when they show up every once in a while.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes

See all 17 User Reviews

Trailers

Related Articles

  1. Best of 2010, Movies

    The Best and Worst Movies of 2010

    The Best and Worst Movies of 2010 Image
    Published: January 7, 2011
    In our annual report, we reveal the best- and worst-reviewed movies of 2010 in a variety of categories.
    More »