- Studio: Columbia Pictures
- Release Date: Feb 17, 2012
User Score
4.5
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 217 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 70 out of 217
-
Mixed: 47 out of 217
-
Negative: 100 out of 217
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Feb 18, 20124
-
Feb 19, 20121There is no reason this movie should exist, no one asked for it and people want it to go away, you can very well tell Nickolas Cage is in it for the money, which is a shame.
-
Aug 1, 20122HAHAHAHA WHAT THE F*CK. HOW DID THIS B-MOVIE END UP IN THE THEATERS? DID THE DIRECTOR FORGET TO SEND IT INTO THE DIRECT-TO-DVD PILE?! NEVER ON THIS PLANET SHOULD A FILM PACKED WITH **** QUALITY AND GREEDY ACTORS LIKE THIS BE MADE!!!!
-
Feb 18, 20121
-
Feb 17, 20120
-
Feb 17, 20122This movie has OK special effects, bad dialogue, bad acting, and a bad storyline. Spirit of Vengeance fails!
-
Feb 19, 20123
-
Feb 19, 20123
-
Feb 29, 20121This movie blows. Not much more that needs to be said. The acting was horrible and you could tell it was made by different people. Nothing matched the first one.
-
Mar 10, 20124This movie was "ok", it had some scenes that were alright, but most of the movie was quite boring. I definitely would not go see a third one. Fool me once...
-
Feb 25, 20122
-
Feb 21, 20121This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Feb 17, 20122
-
Feb 17, 20120A severely misguided film with a terrible plot, terrible dialogue, flat characters, no development, and I'm all just a loud and mediocre mess that will literally bore you to death. Nicolas Cage's performance has never been worse. This movie was 50x as bad as the first which I believe was an ok film, but I honestly think the purpose of this movie was to make a quick buck.
-
Jun 16, 20120what the hell did i just watch? this has to be the worst movie i have ever seen. its has the acting of a low budget porno and the action of a toke flick. i'm embarrassed wasting money to watch this film, i would rather have a nail stuck up my nose then watch this trash ever again.
-
Feb 18, 20120
-
Feb 19, 20124had high hopes from this one but part2 lets it down. part 1 was much better. Stroy misses the grip which part 1 had. The vfx are good (typical ghost rider style) but screenplay disappoints all.
-
Mar 2, 20120A really terrible, horrible, film, the first part be great, but this second, wow EPIC FAIL, the cast is terrible, what is the reason for Violante Placido and Ciarán Hinds work in this awful film?.
-
Feb 25, 20120
-
Feb 19, 20121
-
Feb 17, 20123This is so bad that its not even funny. Lame, poor script and dialogue, flawed logic, terrible acting from the cast, bad CCIs, super cliche. I dont even think there's anything positive from this film. hopefully they are not planning a trilogy.
-
Feb 17, 20121
-
Feb 21, 20122
-
Mar 2, 20123This movie has absolutely nothing to do with the actual comics, its an insult to the Ghost Rider story, sigh* this movie made sure The Ghost Rider franchise, is dead forever. How do we as comic book fans expect to see our favorite superheroes in a live action film, if movies like this, make sure that never happens. Part 1 is 10x better than this, and it wasnt the best movie either.
-
May 31, 20120only one word can describe this film : ANOTHER CRAP !!!
honestly , this sequel is not just worse , but are worst than first film !!!
lame stunting , dazzling visual effects , and even ghost rider can fly ???
man ! this is insane !! **** !!! another trash behind my rubbish tin ..... -
Mar 9, 20123Ghost Rider 2 is crap... What, you want more? Okay, let's see the good things first. It's not many so it wonâ
-
Mar 4, 20122
-
Jun 11, 20124I've seen worse, but even so... Ghost Rider Spirit of Vengeance was kind of.... lame. I really can't describe it any other way. It's nothing like the first movie.
-
Jun 19, 20122Oh how I waited for this one how really bad it was. I'm a big fan of GR but this movie wasted all the potential. Pretty much everything except the CGI special effects was amateurish. The first one, while kinda childish was actually a lot better when compared to this.
-
Nov 4, 20124
-
Jun 5, 20121
-
Mar 26, 20123This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Jun 30, 20120
-
Apr 11, 20133
-
Aug 14, 20122One of the worst films in this segment, do not waste your time watching. The story is confusing and stupid and the acting is extremely poor, is one of those types of sequence made just to get more money.
-
Jun 12, 20124It is mild fun. The first 15 minutes start off slow but as it progresses the action and story really begin to pick up. Its mostly different from the original but its worth watching as a rental.
-
Mar 15, 20130The film is a mix of stupidity, incompetence and worst acting. Nicolas Cage performance is horrible. Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance is a b******t of the worst kind.
-
Mar 12, 20120
-
Apr 5, 20124To be honest, I wasn't expecting much more than badly directed action sequences that makes a mockery of the character of Ghost Rider. In that sense, Spirit of Vengeance delivered.
-
May 27, 20123The first instalment of Ghost Rider was amazing. I really enjoyed that movie but the second instalment was just mediocre and I found myself getting bored half way through.
-
Apr 10, 20124
-
Mar 30, 20123
-
Mar 31, 20124
-
Apr 6, 20121The visual effects were awesome, just as the trailers promised... however the movie seemed to drag on, it just didn't have the same humor and pacing as the film in the series.
-
Apr 8, 201201st movie was ok.SOV was nothing but a waste of time.Fell asleep after the popcorn was gone.Luckily only spent $2 apiece at the 2nd run movie theater.Don't waste your time.Like some movies if it didn't have some decent **** to look at nobody would be left in the theater.
-
Apr 15, 20122The film is moving in the same old pattern,blow up things and fight evil.Is not something special.You can clearly see how Nicolas Cage bored playning this character,it's a totally waste of money,despite the fact that visual effects is even more better than the first one and a fast paced direction from the creators of Crank and Gamer
-
Aug 18, 20123
-
Jul 2, 20122
-
Sep 3, 20120My advice is that, really, don't be so stressed out or so eagerly and insanely dying to watch this disgusting piece of crap. I'm just going to say that it is one of the worst, and maybe THE worst, cinematic experience I 've had since the last Chipmunk movie. You'll leave the movie theater in such an unsuperable hate towards movies that will chase you to the end. Horrible movie, below 0.
-
Jul 18, 20120This is the worst of the worst. An abomination. The movie is called "Ghost Rider" so maybe I wanted to see this Ghost Rider but the character itself is like a cameo, barely appearing in some of the scenes. If Nicholas Cage wasn't so damn crazy we could have a bad movie. But this, is one of the worst pieces of cinema ever created.
-
Jul 19, 20122I found no interest watching this movie. Such a waste of time. Rather I think, previous one wasn't so bad. They made some funny scenes in the movie which were really ridiculous and I couldn't stand those. In fact, the story is also not so interesting. I hope they will come back with something especial next time.
-
Aug 10, 20121This movie is so hilariously bad that it's actually an enjoyable watch. If nothing else, watching Nicholas Cage urinate fire is worth the entrance fee alone.
-
Aug 14, 20124
-
Jan 12, 20134A sequel that seems to be made just to raise money.
-
Nov 15, 20120An unbearable experience. You will literally want to rip your own eyeballs out before its over.
-
Mar 17, 20131Just a poor excuse to play with special effects.
-
30This time out, the action is in 3-D, which amounts to a few shots of flaming motorcycle parts comin' at ya, but little else.
-
Feb 23, 201260This doesn't lack for crazy charm, particularly when Nicolas Cage (in his go-for-broke Bad Lieutenant mode) and Ciaran Hinds (playing the devil) try to out-weird each other with broad, even cartoonish performances.
-
Feb 20, 201240The picture is still much too rickety, slapdash and surprisingly dull to qualify as a good barrel-bottom pleasure.