G.I. Jane

Metascore
62

Generally favorable reviews - based on 21 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 13 out of 21
  2. Negative: 1 out of 21
Watch On
  1. 60
    This hot-button picture isn't especially well thought-out, but it might be crafty and manipulative enough to rile up audiences.
  2. Reviewed by: Sandra Contreras
    60
    Bancroft and Mortensen take home the acting awards -- the pleasure they take in what they're doing really makes the film come alive.
  3. 50
    As a vehicle for Moore's acting abilities (and Mortensen's, for that matter), G.I. Jane is terrific. But as the end-of-summer blockbuster it's doubtless intended to be, it's pretty much a washout.
  4. 50
    Well-intentioned even as it surrenders to commercialism, G.I. Jane comes on like the ultimate battle of the sexes. But it ends up being an unfulfilling exercise in pseudo-feminism. [22 August 1997, p. 7D]
  5. Reviewed by: John Krewson
    40
    If you're looking for a film that addresses a woman's place in a combat unit, keep waiting. If you want a film where a woman can get big muscles and shoot guns and have her husband still love her, here you are.
  6. 40
    G.I. Jane is liberated, all right--from good acting and a good story.
  7. Reviewed by: Deborah Brown
    40
    In spite of a catalogue of downsides, including clunky dialogue, fuzzy morals and preposterous story lines, G.I. Jane does offer a perverse level of enjoyment.
User Score
6.2

Generally favorable reviews- based on 29 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 1 out of 2
  1. Nov 12, 2012
    2
    The hump of feminism and war cliches floats down close to insufferable.
  2. jayk
    Feb 3, 2009
    7
    Decent.