- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: May 12, 2000
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
100The acting is smart and gritty, Almereyda's visual style has a raw immediacy found in few films with Shakespearean pedigrees, and an eclectic music score adds atmosphere and surprise every step of the way.
-
100Almereyda excises big chunks of plot to shape his vision, but retains Shakespeare's language and pays such rigorous attention to meaning and subtext that what's missing isn't missed.
-
100If this Hamlet weren't so perfectly conceived visually, it would probably stand solidly on the basis of its acting alone.
-
100Almereyda imagines Hamlet taking place in present-day Manhattan with such vigor, insight and originality that the power and immediacy of his film makes Shakespeare accessible in an exciting and provocative manner beyond all expectations.
-
100New York becomes a complex character in this vital and sharply intelligent film.
-
90A marvelous feat of re-imagination.
-
88Almereyda's smart, streamlined adaptation is full of such neat little ironies.
-
83Fresh, vibrant and vital, this interpretation reminds us why Shakespeare is timeless.
-
80Cast for fun, and the whimsy is enjoyable both for its parody of heavy-handed "relevant" updates of the play.
-
80Thou wilt be dazzled.
-
80New York City has never looked so slick and shallow as it does in Hamlet, an innovative, contemporary adaptation.
-
80These are great, primal stories that pull you in, make you care and put you on the edge of madness and violence.
-
Almereyda's respect for his audience and his queasiness about the present register with equal weight, reinventing the poetry in the most relevant ways possible.
-
75Both a distraction and a revelation.
-
75Hamlet finds in Hawke's greatish performance a Great Dane for this, or any other, modern moment.
-
75This is a sizzling, invigorating Hamlet.
-
70Stylish, funny, and smart...but only up to a point.
-
70It goes without saying that the film is worth seeing simply for Bill Murray's Polonius.
-
68Almereyda never plays up the gimmickry at the expense of the performances, and as a result, his movie largely succeeds, despite an overabundance of pretentious pokes at our consumer culture and the risky casting of Ethan Hawke in the lead role.
-
67Bill Murray's Polonius is so delightfully coy and self-satisfied that this performance is reason alone to see the picture.
-
63As Almereyda unrolled his modern Gotham version, the story became gripping, the characters fascinating, the events mesmerizing, the resolution shocking and piteous.
-
63Some of the contemporary winks are questionable, but others are undeniably sharp.
-
63Almereyda has done a splendid job of rendering Hamlet as expressive visually as it is verbally.
-
60Has an interesting look, several sensational performances (notably from Kyle MacLachlan and Liev Schreiber) and in general works far better than it has any right to.
-
60Despite the few good performances, this Hamlet is not a keeper.
-
60This slacker prince (Hawke) comprises a sinkhole at the center of adaptor-helmer Michael Almereyda's otherwise compelling contempo update.
-
50It commits the only crime that can be committed against Shakespeare: It makes him boring.
-
50But all the devices and upgrades do little to bring the poetry's meaning into clearer and more relevant focus for today's audiences.
-
50Hamlet, like its title character, is a mopey, dopey thing that you just want to scream at: Do something!
-
40A darkly interesting distraction but not much more.
-
38May well be the dullest and most pointless version ever filmed, thanks to a stunningly bad lead performance by Ethan Hawke.
-
38Hamlet has audacity, intelligence, a provocative visual and musical style, virtually no poetry, a garbled story line weakened by savage cutting of the play, and a great yawning hole where a Hamlet ought to be.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 4 out of 8
-
Mixed: 1 out of 8
-
Negative: 3 out of 8
-
Jim0Shakespeare's Hamlet had psychic balls. Ehtan Hawke has none.
-
AmyJ.0This film is so poor. It is completely void of anything worth watching.
-
JacquelynM.8