User Score
7.2 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 22 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 22
  2. Negative: 2 out of 22

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. PeterJ.
    May 9, 2006
    3
    I am shocked at all of the good scores this movie has received. Besides seeing Phoebe's nipple, I was bored out of my mind watching this movie. It was so bad my wife made me turn it off. Good thing I did, because then we watched Cinderella Man, which was a great movie!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. JackM.
    Jul 20, 2005
    8
    This film is a witty, intelligent look at modern relationships in all their complexity. From the delayed consequences of lies and secrets to revelations about ones self and ones relationships to finding a proper ending for ones life story, this is a delightful drama and a serious human comedy.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. [Anonymous]
    Mar 1, 2006
    9
    Love multiple-intertwined story movies if they get get at least a liitle depth. In comparison Crash may have been famously cast and well-acted but it was far too flitting / characters left under-developed. This was well explored and albeit simply (through the text) well connected. The characters were less 2-dimensional, and thank goodness humorous and less depressing (i.e. more like Pulp).
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. RalphD.
    Jul 29, 2005
    9
    My response to Rob F: Bad reviews due to "homophobic film critics?" Nonsense! I see myself as more homophobic than today's average film critic, and I loved the film for its humor, its humanity, its insights, its Altmanesque convolutions and its sheer visual beauty.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. DavidA.
    Aug 9, 2005
    9
    The most unfairly maligned film of the year - and one of the best!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. ChadS.
    Sep 12, 2005
    8
    Don Roos uses title cards as a replacement for a voice-over, which are usually done in the first-person, but his commentaries are written in third-person, and had they been narrated, "Happy Endings" might've resembled Rebecca Miller's "Personal Velocity". Roos gives the moviegoer a choice; you can either read the fine print, or ignore the added information without any fatal hinderance to your understanding of the narrative. By ignoring the title cards, the characters have more ambiguity. But if you read silently to yourself, you're participating in the film. You're the narrator. Roos' experiment might be unnecessary(unnecessary because he steals some of the spotlight from the great Maggie Gyllenhaal, the underrated Lisa Kudrow, and the unbeknownst Tom Arnold), but the conceit works if you have a hypothesis for its justification. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. SeanJ.
    Dec 11, 2006
    4
    Casting Maggie Gyllenhaal as a calculating young skank didn't ring true - she's too old for the role, cavorting around with young 20-somethings. Her singing performance at the end as a sort of character redemption (typical Hollywood Happy Ending!) made me want to slap the screenwriter/director. Kudrow's character was irritating and unrealistic, except the actress letting her age/wrinkles show through (minimal Botox - wow). Her meltdown at the beginning/ending made you feel cheated, like "oh come on heifer! Will you get a grip". The two son's featured in the film were zero-dimensional. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. RobertC.
    Jul 7, 2006
    8
    Got off to a slow start and I almost gave up on it, but the quirky characters and raw emotions won me over. Lisa Kudrow was very good. Maggie Gyllenhaal was amazing as usual and I really enjoyed her version of "Don't go Changin'" at the end. I found the occasinal split screen narrative distracting, but it was a wothwhile movie experience for me.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. SamW
    Dec 12, 2005
    4
    The Opposite of Sex is one of my all-time favorite movies because Don Roos succeeds so masterfully at presenting unlikable characters and making them eminently likable. Happy Endings fails utterly in this respect. The characters start out unlikable and remain that way throughout the movie. The acting is great, but not enough to save this movie from being a festival of misery and depression.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. ArizonaRex
    Dec 29, 2005
    10
    So I loved The Opposite of Sex and I expected this one to be really similar, if not irritatingly the same. But it wasn't. I didn't really consider this a comedy or a dramedy. It was abstract and sad and moving. Don Roos, whether intentionally or not, moved me with this film. With chaos and beauty, he amazed me. The performances were great, the script was amazing. This movie was beautiful and caught we way off guard. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. larrya.
    Dec 30, 2005
    9
    Great fun. I was hoping the movie would last a hour longer. A different type of movie that woked out very well. I was happy I watched it on DVD so could replay and enjoy parts a second time! Makes me happy a film can entertain so well without a zillion dollar budget!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. RobF
    Jul 22, 2005
    9
    Why is this funny, smart and ultimate touching film getting lousy reviews? Homophobic film ciritcs.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. MikeN.
    Aug 19, 2005
    8
    A really fresh and quirky film with three-dimentional characters that are as complex and conflicted as we all are in real life. Great writing, acting and direction, and interwoven plot lines that remind you of the hidden links that connect us to each another. Go in with an open mind and you're in for a treat.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. AmurabiM.
    Jun 26, 2006
    7
    "This is a comedy. Sort of" says one of the multiple title cards, displayed in this film. The title cards can work as a distraction, right, but also can show a lack of talent of Roos direction. Yes, his script is witty, smart and talented, with a great mix of tragedy and comedy (that´s the reason which that title card proves that, at least, this film is earnest) but you have to read those, to believe and find a justification fot the acts of the characters . With terrific performances (Maggie Gyllenhaal is a goddess from the contemporary american cinema) and superb storylines (that looks realistic, plausible and believable), "Happy Endings" could be a masterpiece if something must have not been forget: passion. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 31 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 31
  2. Negative: 2 out of 31
  1. Reviewed by: Jeremy Mathews
    60
    Roos creates a slate of interesting characters who find themselves in unexpected situations that lead to realistic--and in their own way, happy--endings.
  2. A real audience pleaser, so long as that audience is mentally agile and adult, for it comes at you from odd angles and features three distinct story lines and 10 main characters.
  3. Reviewed by: Todd McCarthy
    50
    A protracted parade of woefully familiar motifs from the Amerindie playbook, Happy Endings comes off like an undernourished Paul Thomas Anderson wannabe.