- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Apr 25, 2008
User Score
6.4
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 106 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 68 out of 106
-
Mixed: 13 out of 106
-
Negative: 25 out of 106
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Nov 9, 20112I can only imagine that the director of this movie was so high that he think that been high is to cool that actually could be funny, this movie is to racist, stupid and extreme that sucks my score is 2 out of 10
-
Oct 12, 20118
-
Aug 7, 20114Stupid movie with 'physiological' sense of humor. The only reason I watched it was Neil Patrick Harris... And he didn't let me down, because his character (named... Neil Patrick Harris) was hilarious.
-
DanielV.Aug 6, 20096
-
-
BethC.Jun 17, 20093
-
-
DanCJan 28, 20093
-
-
CarlWAug 26, 200810
-
-
PaulF.Aug 17, 20088
-
-
JoeS.Aug 16, 20080We loved the first one. This one is awful. Explicit nudity and excessive crudity substitute for clever humor. What a disappointment!
-
-
ecAug 12, 20086
-
-
ChrisP.Aug 6, 20080One of the greater regrets in my life was not stopping myself from leaving the room where the movie was playing. The jokes fall into the f-yeah, beer, boobs, weed, 18-24 range that can drive anyone crazy.
-
-
MichaelA.Aug 4, 200810
-
-
JoeT.Aug 3, 20084SPOILER This mislabeled sequel doesn't even have much to do with Gitmo. Any opportunity lost. Probably a '6', but am so disappointed by how unfunny and toothless this sequel turned out.
-
-
RyencokeAug 1, 20080It really wasn't funny at all. It was just toilet humor.. First one was good. This was just plain garbage.
-
-
ChrisW.Aug 1, 20089Not as good as the first movie... but it had its moments. Neil Patrick Harris is Golden! The Un-Rated version was a bit too un-rated at times. I felt like I had stumbled onto a Porn channel or something during the pool scene and when the two hookers start making out.
-
-
MaxW.Jul 31, 20088Not a perfect movie, but very enjoyable. I'm tough on comedies, but this movie had me laughing loudly many times.
-
-
GeorgeN.Jul 31, 20089I really enjoyed this movie. It was nice to relax and laugh. It made me happy! Also, Joe A. is obviously a racist.
-
-
ApocalypseBrownJul 24, 20080What a sad and pathetic film! Not only is it an insult to those innocents tortured and killed there, it is a huge waste of time and money. AVOID! Or watch on pirate.
-
-
OgestJul 22, 20086I was really looking forward to seeing it since i loved first part. However, after I watched "Escape from Guantanamo Bay" I was disappointed. Still it is funny and jokes are good but I was expecting more from second part of Harold & Kumar adventures. Too bad N.P.H. didn't make it to the end.
-
-
JayH.Jul 18, 20085John Cho and Kal Penn are terrific, but the story and humor goes too much to the extreme, and the humor also tends to be really gross at times. But, it does have some very funny scenes.
-
-
DanS.Jun 29, 20080I have to give the movie a 0 because it was so bad and I walked out. Lots of single word would describe it, terrible, lame, wasteful, tasteless, etc.
-
-
WiltonCJun 25, 20080The worst movie I've seen since Norbit. Let's kill off the only good thing about the first movie, recycle all the old jokes and try to pass off that war criminal Bush as some kind of pot smoking cool guy who hates his dad.
-
-
JoeA.May 25, 20080It was garbage. It was total anti-racist. The film makes fun of white people. It is garbage. Not funny. The guy breaks many laws and should have gone to jail. Total stupid, but Neil Patrick Harris is okay.
-
-
BlakKMay 25, 20086I felt this sequel was made for the sake of making a sequel. It really didn't live up to the original. Many of the jokes fell flat, and I got the impression that they were trying too hard. Might be a decent afternoon DVD viewing, but certainly not worth the price of a movie ticket.
-
-
RobertP.May 11, 20088If it's good enough for A.O. Scott, it's good enough for me. I've seen it twice. The stereotypes are well done. The nasty humor is so ridiculous that you can't help but bust a gut laughing. Not for everyone. The easily offended should stay home and fans of that new Ashton Kutcher movie wouldn't get it.
-
-
JeffW.May 7, 20082A very sad excuse for a comedy. It lacked any overall cleverness or even humor at all.
-
-
NeilH.May 6, 200810This movie is instantly in my top 3 movies all time. The people who rate it low are just the grouchy old people.
-
-
BillLMay 2, 20086Definitely not bad, but doesn't top the first one. However, considering how its just another low-budget stoner movie, it is well written and definately deserves a view for college kids with a free weekend.
-
-
ChadS.May 1, 20082
-
-
TomS.Apr 29, 20082This was a pitiful, unfunny sequel to the brilliant initial film. Boring, predictable, and juvenile. Real disappointment. Avoid it.
-
-
TylerH.Apr 29, 200810Great movie, I don't get why its rated so low.
-
-
EnderW.Apr 28, 20089Funny movie. Maybe not as great as the first one, but still a great stoner flick.
-
-
PoopsM.Apr 28, 20087If you enjoyed the first one, you'll enjoy this one. You are warned, however, that this films title is very misleading. It should really be called, "Harold and Kumar Try to Get Laid" as most of the movie centers around Harold trying to find his dream woman and Kumar tries to go to Texas to stop his ex from marrying some guy who has 3 small scenes.
-
-
JeffS.Apr 28, 20085This movie had no direction and very little humor. It's as if they tried to patch together a whole movie out of one or two good humurous moments.
-
-
NickS.Apr 28, 200810Hilarious, something you can partially relate to, and overall a great comedy.
-
-
TheSwamiApr 28, 20089Not quite as good as the first (as expected in any sequel), but it is pretty freaking funny at times. Some jokes fall flat, but on the whole I was greatly entertained.
-
-
FrederickM.Apr 28, 20089Not as great as the first, but a throughly enjoyable experience.
-
-
JimBApr 28, 20085These first 3 ratings are from rating bots; there is no way this movie is worth a 10; it was worse than the first. The movie was epic meh.
-
-
RCApr 28, 200810Excellent movie! very funny as well as pokes fun at how stupid and arrogant the us government is.
-
-
TylerD.Apr 27, 200810Unbelievably hilarious and i don't even do drugs
-
-
AlecB.Apr 27, 200810Easily the funniest movie of 2008. Even better than the first Harold and Kumar. It kept me laughing from the beginning all the way to the end. Anybody who liked the first movie or just likes a funny comedy i strongly recommend this one
-
-
AthenaApr 27, 20089One of the best laughs you will have at the movies all year. Completely ridiculous but you should expect that. Beware of some poop jokes at the beginning but other than that you'll just laugh till your sides hurt
-
-
BillH.Apr 27, 20083Absolutely abysmal. Even after you get past all the unecessary raunch - the over-the top language; the stupid scenes; the sophmoric sexual references (gay & straight); what you are left with is a really bad movie. I'm only rating it a 3 because there were at least a few funny scenes.
-
-
[Anonymous]Apr 27, 20089Great movie. Some laughs already seen in the trailers, but definitely not a let down.
-
-
BaffL.Apr 27, 20089Love that it picks up right after the first movie, also college age Harold nearly made me piss myself. Maybe all these newspaper critics feel it's beneath them. Bah!
-
-
RichardS.Apr 26, 20082
-
-
MaxG.Apr 26, 20088God damn is this funny.
-
-
DougGApr 26, 200810As good as if not better than the first. The threesome with the weed, Kumar, and his soon to be fiance was just hilarious.
-
-
TiS.Apr 25, 200810Cool movie.
-
-
HugoR.Apr 25, 200810As good as the first.
-
-
DavidA.Apr 25, 200810Simply Amazing.
-
-
Lacks the fresh charm that made their first such an unexpected (if guilty) pleasure.
-
70An over-the-top and beyond-PC comedy that sometimes deftly, sometimes slapdashedly infuses party-hearty anarchy with hectoring moral outrage.
-
50Mostly dumb, no matter how desperately and even valiantly it aims for "thinky."