- Studio: Overture Films
- Release Date: Jan 20, 2012
User Score
5.4
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 175 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 95 out of 175
-
Mixed: 39 out of 175
-
Negative: 41 out of 175
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Jan 21, 20129
-
Jan 24, 201210Finally a woman who actually knows how to throw a punch instead of crappy fighters like Jolie. Corano is hot and able to kick most guys asses. I would like to see her do more.
-
Jan 20, 201210This review contains spoilers.
-
Jan 22, 201210
-
Jan 25, 20129
-
Jan 24, 201210Basically everyone who gave this movie a bad review is brainwashed by Hollywood. Probably people who liked Mall Cop or something, and people who don't like seeing women kicking ass. If you want to leave the theatre satisfied and thinking "Wow I just saw a really good movie", go see it. It's a totally unconventional action movie, simply great. It feels 'realistic' in a human condition.
-
Apr 19, 20129
-
Jan 28, 201210
-
Jun 1, 20129Before watching this I'd never heard of it nor the lead actress, so wasn't expecting much from it... and then I was totally blown away by the fight scene realism and a decent story to boot... One of the best female action movies I've seen in a very long time that didn't rely on stupid CGI and wires to pull off the choreography
-
May 9, 201210Gina Carino really holds her own as the only female character, delivering a solid performance
http://pricerunner.co.uk/switched-on-tech/article/female-species-more-deadly-male
-
80This is a film built around its star, just as surely as any of its cheesier '80s forebears.
-
50The movie is a divertissement; it's lightweight and almost meaningless except for the fights, which are extraordinarily violent. [30 Jan. 2012, p.79]
-
70Soderbergh tends to get one big idea - a thesis idea - per film and stick with it even when a touch more flexibility would help. Here it's that non-kinetic camera, which he's so wedded to that parts of the film seem underenergized, like a cheap seventies or early eighties picture you'd catch at two in the morning on Cinemax's tenth most popular channel.