- Studio: Sony Pictures Classics
- Release Date: Jun 17, 2005
User Score
4.8
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 37 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 14 out of 37
-
Mixed: 8 out of 37
-
Negative: 15 out of 37
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
JoeW.Feb 17, 20068I don't know how people can do cartwheels for a terrible movie like "You, me and Everyone we Know", and pan this one. It has really good dialougue and acting. Elizabeth Banks is going to be huge--she's great in everything, comedy and drama. This is a solid, entertaining movie worth seeing.
-
-
BenitaJul 22, 20051A waste of a few hours. Dumb, dumb and even dumber. Totally predictable. Just a movie for some great actors to pick up the lunch check. Ho hum.
-
-
FantasyJul 7, 20055
-
-
LeslieJul 9, 20055Saw it, saw it coming without any real twists or turns. Good acting but so what? Left the theater empty. It was forgotten ten minutes later.
-
-
AlbertH.Jul 9, 20054If you like Shakespear you'll love this as the actors all can act very well. The problem is they have nothing to work with. George Segal is very good in a too brief role as the Rabbi pretending to be a stand up comedian? Come to think of it he is. S0-SO at best.
-
-
SidiotAug 3, 20050Tony stop sniffing the glue will you please? Boring as hell unless you like to watch moss grow on a rock or paint drying? Avoid. If I want to Shakespear I will watch Shakespear not this twill.
-
-
TJJul 11, 20054Someone told me if I wanted to see great acting to go see this. So I went. Next time I will watch moss grow on a rock or paint dry; however, it is well acted. But it goes nowhere as it loops around to exactly where you know they will all be by sundown. Not my cup of tea.
-
-
HarryJul 22, 20050A refund please if you will. Pretty lame joke of a movie. Everything telegraphed and then acted out as if it were a Shakeperian event. Awful.
-
-
DavidJul 23, 20051The substitute for Sominex. If you want to catch some ZZZZZ's here's the movie for you.
-
-
TonyJul 30, 200510Honest and paced. A charater driven movie that works.
-
-
BillF.Jul 4, 20059Excellent Acting with a very good script.
-
-
ToddJul 7, 20054Pompous Glen Close is overbearing trying to shag any guy despite the fact that they are all gay. Much ado about nothing. Left the theater empty although Elizabeth Banks is a future star and George Segal still has it.
-
-
AlexG.Jul 8, 20052Take great actors and give them nothing to work with. The result is Heights. A waste of your time and money. Everything is totally predictable from the time the movie starts.
-
-
TyroneA.Jul 9, 20053Yuk, as it is much ado about nothing.
-
-
TomM.Apr 16, 20076Interesting storyline, excellent cast, and good performances. Poor sound or an inferior print resulted in my not giving this film a higher rating. I missed too many crucial lines. Even when a film is operating within the confines of a low budget, there is no excuse for second rate sound or substandard equipment.
-
-
KayW.Nov 27, 20054A movie that means well with very good actors but limited dialogue and predictable TV sitcom-type behavior. Glenn Close does her best, and that's worth a watch.
-
-
IanR.Jul 15, 20059A thoroughly engaging adult movie with a good script, excellent acting and some cinematography risks. Maybe the lack of car chases and explosions made it difficult to understand for some of the reviewers.
-
-
JuwawnD.Jul 17, 20054Great actors, great acting, but so what? Predictable and boring. Shakespear it is not. Is a rose by any other name not still a rose? This is a lemon.
-
-
LarryW.Jul 21, 20051Plain and simple I hated it. Great actors going nowhere. Thank God it all took place in one day or else I would have had to kill myself. I gave a one for George Segal.
-
-
LloydJul 7, 20055Ho hum yawn. Not really interesting at all.
-
-
MarkB.Aug 15, 20056
-
-
GeorgeF.Nov 15, 20050This is a terrible movie that got some good reviews because it has a gay love scene.
-
-
PepG.Jun 24, 20058
-
-
ChuckS.Jun 24, 200510Fine acting. Excellent story. Nice to see this expanded version come out off the Sundance workshop.
-
-
ArleneW.Jul 11, 20052Doesn't anyone out there in Hollywood have any idea on how to make a movie that the audience could enjoy? Enough is enough.
-
-
LaverneJul 17, 20053Heights comes crashing down to Earth soon after starting. Predictable and tedious with little surprises. George Segal as the Rabbi in an all too brief role could have saved this film but only with more screen time. The rest were capable robotic performances with little meat.
-
-
RajivAug 16, 20051My God this was awful. The advance Scout team obviously took No Doze before entering the theater. Earth to Greg don't quit your day job as your review is awful. Shakespear it is not.
-
-
70Director Chris Terrio confidently delivers a solid first feature, but sometimes doesn’t always engage in the characters’ inner demons, which could have made an even better film given the cast and material.
-
50As enjoyable as Close is, Heights as a whole is a mannered simulation that only occasionally and accidentally feels like real New York life.
-
60An entertaining ensembler marbled with wit and heartache.