- Studio: Lions Gate Films
- Release Date: Jan 6, 2006
User Score
4.3
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 258 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 111 out of 258
-
Mixed: 19 out of 258
-
Negative: 128 out of 258
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
AmandaP.Jan 6, 20063Was not scary at all!!
-
-
RyanH.Jan 3, 20070One of the the worst movies I have ever seen. I think i was watching a stupid teenage trip movie that went wrong and had added gore for fun. It is the standard gory movie with the stupidest characters who set themselves up to be killed with one person making it out alive.
-
-
RD.Apr 4, 20074
-
-
DannyB.Jan 10, 20069Pretty solid movie, could've used more Charlize Theron though. One sex scene is never enough for me. The kids were priceless.
-
-
danieli.Jan 10, 20061It's a pretty pathetic plot line with little or no back story. The movie is not all deep, with only scenes that will shock the audience. The first half is a glorified porno, while the last 45 minutes are made as groteskly as possible. If you like movies with no plot and horrible lines this Hostel was made for you.
-
-
EricS.Jan 21, 200610
-
-
MelissaJan 7, 20060Very disturbing and degrating movie towards women. Definitely not a date movie. The gore aspect was just too much they showed peoples faces being burned with blow torches. It sucked.
-
-
WendyJan 7, 20060A movie made for juvenile teenagers [Ed: uhhh..]. With the garbage currently playing it should do well at the box office. But the truth is it is pretty bad. Move over Mr. Jackson, Mr. Q has joined you as a one-trick pony. Avoid.
-
-
KadyCampJan 8, 20068This movie was not scary, but fun to watch, if you enjoy gore, blood, severed limbs, and that type of stuff. The first part of the movie had me laughing like crazy, I thought it was a comedy; then it just took a turn down the gore road. Excellent for people with a dark sense of humor...go see it if you want some nasty fun at the movies.
-
-
JoeB.Jan 8, 20068
-
-
NickiC.Jan 8, 20062
-
-
SEanM.Jan 8, 20069Eli Roth is a brilliant director with a lot of potential, I would not mind seeing a full length rotten fruit feature. Hostel provides the gore, the women, the drugs, and boatloads of endless laughter. The kids in this movie are priceless.
-
-
BrookL.Jan 8, 20062The first hour was Eurotrip, of which I'm not a fan. The second hour, for about 5 minutes, gave the impression that it might do okay. But no, somehow Roth managed to take one of the best original plots of the year and completely screw it up. The score was absolutely terrible, the movie seemed like a joke. I was so disappointed, you willl be too. Avoid this.
-
-
Danc.Jan 9, 200610Good
-
-
JaredSSJan 9, 20068
-
-
ClarkJan 9, 200610It was my wife's birthday and the only thing she wanted to do was see Hostel. We went and had a nice romantic evening. Awesome date movie! Made us crave Chicken McNuggets, which we got afterwards.
-
-
MichaelB.Jan 9, 20060
-
-
NickA.Sep 8, 20061
-
-
ABSep 9, 20072It is surprising that "Hostel" was advertised as a particularly shocking horror film; it turns out to be standard horror fare: it is boring, fairly gory, and has no plot whatsoever. And, of course, it is not scary. Its only merit is that, although it is sharply degrading (especially toward women and children), it is not as offensive as its preposterous sequel.
-
-
CarlW.Jan 13, 20060If you're going to put all your eggs in one basket, it should be a pretty gory basket... gorier than a few chopped-off fingers and a cheesy hanging eyeball. I would've given this a 1 if the obnoxious main character had been tortured and killed.
-
-
EddieB.Jan 15, 20068
-
-
ScottH.Jan 16, 20069Wow, an 80's teenage T&A movie that turns into a gore-fest in the middle! Shame on all of you who gave this low scores! I haven't seen something this quirky since From Dusk Till Dawn.
-
-
ChrisA.Jan 21, 20061
-
-
AramisG.Jan 27, 200610
-
-
V.MartinezJan 6, 200610This movie is well made and directed. It is graphic, so be forewarned. It has a plot, though, and despite no-name actors, the acting is pretty good. I had no complaints. It's not a date movie, unless you both like 'Reservoir Dogs' or something. I gave it a ten because it was done on a low budget with well-made gory effects courtesy of Tarantino and the other Director.
-
-
JoeM.Jan 6, 20060
-
-
LaTriceW.Jan 7, 200610this movie was excellant but it was alot of sex but other than that the mystery was great.
-
-
AndyJan 7, 20061I don't know what crack these other reviewers are smoking. This is not the best horror film made. This is not at all traumatizing. It is not even the goriest movie 'EVA'. Devoid of tension or suspense but lots of gore mixed with fresh harvests of European jiggly-tits. Wait for the DVD.
-
-
MeaganD.Jan 7, 20065
-
-
ericvJan 8, 20069
-
-
JaneWJan 8, 200610Wendy is an idiot. "Mr. Jackson is a one-trick pony" who has done more with his life than 10 year old wendy will ever do. And as for Hostel, it was a terrific horror film. Not the greatest of all time but it still was very well done.
-
-
CharltonXJan 9, 200610
-
-
WilliamR.Jan 9, 20067
-
-
LukasH.Feb 2, 20068
-
-
ShoshanahM.Feb 28, 20060Worst movie I've seen this year. Not so much a horror film, more of a glorified snuff film. The filmmaker seemed only interested in how many times he could gross out the audience, rather than building up genuine fear and suspense. You could not *pay* me to watch this movie again.
-
-
OdelloS.Mar 29, 20069
-
-
NickyB.Apr 17, 20069
-
-
ERApr 18, 20068
-
-
CoryApr 21, 20062
-
-
JakeK.Apr 21, 20062I really dont get how anyone can say how this movie was gory. I thought there wasnt that much of it. [***SPOILERS***] i mean , when the guy takes that electric screw driver over to the guy and puts it in his leg, u dont even see it. the only good part of this movie was when there was all of this naked hott chicks but other wise, it was horrible.
-
-
MikM.Apr 24, 20063Poor story, weak acting, and a couple torture scenes. Not worth 2 hours of your life (let alone rental or purchase price).
-
-
RonM.Apr 27, 20069
-
-
OllyF.Apr 3, 20064A movie that aimed to scare but only shocked using over the top gore. Pretty brainless stuff without any real watchable factors.
-
-
BitBurnMay 11, 20067It's not half as bad as the critic says. Everything you may expect from a horror flick is here. I'm surely not a big fan of the genre but this one was definitely worth a rental!
-
-
BillJul 15, 200610Maybe the best horror movie this decade. disturbing, creepy, funny, and gory. a must see.
-
-
AmurabiM.Jul 8, 20066
-
-
AlecB.Aug 16, 20067more of a soft porn flick than horror. not what i was expecting but still pretty good.
-
-
MarkC.Aug 20, 20063this moive is not scary at all it just freakin nasty it is very boring it has no suspense.You already know whats going to happen before it happens now can u tell me how lame it that?
-
-
JohnE.Oct 10, 20068I thought the idea behind this film was brilliant. A lot of people have criticised it because it is either too gory, or because it is not gory enough. I liked the film because it got the balance right - it was a bit slow to get going, but this only made the last half hour feel more shocking. Worth seeing.
-
-
DrunkenMasterJan 11, 20061It's total poop. Strictly for sadists w/ severe learning disabilities.
-
-
CamN.Jan 12, 20069
-
-
ToddJan 12, 20068This is what you want in a hyperviolent splatterhouse flick. More breasts, blood, and weirdos than I could have possibly hoped for. A+
-
-
KingChadJan 15, 20060Sorry little boys and girls but this film really sucked. Not worthy of your time or money. Avoid.
-
-
JesseM.Jan 16, 200610Wow, wow, wow. This movie was amazing. It was the gorefest of movies. It's in many ways sick and twisted, and yet you'll love it. The only way that you'll apreaciate this movie is if you're a gore fan. This movie was just crazy, it has everything in it. Lots o' gore and violence and tonssss of nudity. Anyways, check it out. Definitely worth the $10.
-
-
TroyS.Jan 16, 20061Utterly worthless piece of gratuitous junk. An embarassment to the film industry. It should have been rated NC-17.
-
-
SamuelL.Jan 17, 20069
-
-
DanR.Jan 18, 200610
-
-
DaveK.Jan 19, 20060How did this piece of garbage get an "r" rating? Very predictible plot; gratuitous sex and violence; an utterly filthy and disgusting journey into the twisted minds of Roth and Tarentino. Don't go!
-
-
KeeganB.Jan 22, 20069I think people forget they are watching a horror movie when they make there reviews. Eli Roth has put forth one of the most twisted movies I have watched to this day. This movie has some extreamly realistic qualitys to it, from the story to what comes next. If you are a horror movie junkie this if for you, it puts SAW to shame.
-
-
FatherGooseJan 27, 200610
-
-
JeffM.Oct 29, 20065If you want a soft-core porn movie that turns into a torture flick halfway through, this is your movie. I like naked breasts as much as the next guy, but the gore was mostly disappointing.
-
-
JohnF.Jan 5, 200610Disgusting and horrible... but I love it.
-
-
SanshiS.Jan 6, 200610unbelievably, the best horror flick ever made. i was seriously disturbed by the movie. people were leaving the theater. definitely not for the faint or light-hearted. i can't believe how this movie gets under your skin. if you want to be utterly traumatized by a movie, see this one.
-
-
JoeW.Jan 6, 200610If you want to watch a movie with all the good stuff (excessive sex, violence, drugs...the works), and want to be scared pantless while doing it? See this movie now. Definately the GORIEST movie EVA!!! Sqeemish beware... you're in for a scare...
-
-
DrewF.Jan 7, 20069Best horror flick i've seen in awhile. Torture sequences are incredibly well-done. Be forewarned: not for the squeamish. Horror seems to have FINALLY kicked the self-referential "SCREAM" stuff. It is the better for it.
-
-
ChrisJan 8, 20068Pretty good movie. First 20 min was full of nudity etc, middle was extremely gory and violent (if you don't like violence, don't watch the movie and don't complain when you see it --- see the trailer before you see the movie...). The acting was pretty good, surprisingly. Ending was the best part of the movie.
-
-
bobertbJan 9, 20068Bound to replace battle royale as the college guy's holy grail of gore flicks. as to the lady that said the plot outline seems like a joke...it is. watch cabin fever. roth always has his tongue in his cheek, even (hell, especially) when he's busting out the seven year old skull bashers.
-
-
CoryC.Jan 9, 20060Not good. Not enough horror. It took an hour to get to something at least bit scary. The first hour is basically American Pie and all u see are naked chicks. No time is really spent in the tortue rooms. Overall, not scary and not that gory as i thought.
-
-
artpJan 9, 20060The whole first part of the movie is awefully directed. The rest is glorified violence with no purpose but to shock audiences. This movie is a disgrace to the art of movie making.
-
-
ChrissyFeb 11, 20063Perhaps this movie would've been better, if the completely inexplicable (and dreadful) comedy pieces hadn't been pushed into the dialogue. Not only that, but the acting seemed have an unrealistic, and almost dull effect. Nudity is also quite overused in this movie. If you'd like to go and see a torturesome, comedic porno-flick, then this is the movie for you.
-
-
RossD.Feb 27, 20069This film acheived what it was set out to do. Scare the living crap out of us, make us gag, and make us not want to visit western Europe. I made the mistake of taking my girlfriend to it. It is cleary a guy movie.
-
-
DanC.Mar 23, 20067Ross D i think you mean east europe, western europe is Britain, france etc Slovakia is east, anyway I dont know that all the fuss is about. Who actaully went to the movie to watch a movie with a comlex and thrilling plot? Everyone knows its a glorified snuff film and thats why people watch it, reason i went and i satisfied.
-
-
RobApr 17, 20068
-
-
SteveA.Apr 20, 20065
-
-
JimQ.Apr 23, 20060I want my 95 minutes of life back.
-
-
AquamanMay 19, 20063I am the kind of guy who likes the typical horror movie. When i came across this at the movie store, i thought "hey, this looks good", i was incorrect. I just could not summon up the strength to find this movie enjoyable.
-
-
JessL.May 2, 20069Those who actually get paid for their film opinions (lucky bastards) always slam horror flicks, so I'm not surprised at their mediocre reviews. But what's up with all you users?? This is one of the best creepshows made in years. The only reason I didn't give it a 10 is because I'm holding out for the sequel.
-
-
DanJun 16, 20069
-
-
[Anonymous]Jun 17, 20060This movie is stupid, it has no plot, its not scary, its just disgusting. The first hour or so is ok, but after that, its one of the dumbest movies I have ever seen.
-
-
DavidC.Jun 22, 20067
-
-
ZackO.Jun 27, 20060why why why? the first half hour is pretty much cliche softcore horror movie porn. after that, it becomes a twisted and meaningless film of needless torture and pain. there is no reason for this movie to exist. the eye mayonaise really did it for me. i actually laughed out loud when the blatantly fake thousand island dressing splurged of the asian's eye socket.
-
-
JonathanD.Jun 7, 20064
-
-
NoahG.Sep 13, 20066[***SPOILERS***] I thought this was awesome! It was really wrenching at times, like when the guys feet freakin get cut & he stands up.....gross!, but all in all it was really good..... real gore....But it didnt really go any where..... all it was was people getting tortured or dieng but yea it was good...
-
-
MarkW.Jan 11, 20060I was expecting something alot more scarier. The extreme violence wasnt something that scared you after you left the theatre. You just feel like you wasted two hours.
-
-
SaraJan 11, 20068So, obviously, this movie won't give you any epiphanic insights into life, i.e. human evil. BUT, as far as pure entertainment value goes, it's not bad at all. Go if you're looking for a decent jolt, not for a brainstorm.
-
-
JoelT.Jan 12, 20068Didn't live up to the hype, but I don't know that anything would have. Good movie regardless.
-
-
RobertM.Jan 13, 200610
-
-
M.EscherJan 14, 20060
-
-
TonydannieJan 15, 20062
-
-
GrantN.Jan 16, 20063If you enjoy this movie then you have no taste in movies. The first 45 minutes is just sex and the director uses excessive gore to mask incompatence and a lack of tension.
-
-
BobbyJ.Jan 23, 20060
-
-
A.J.S.Jan 25, 200610
-
-
RyanJ.Feb 24, 20064
-
-
WetwebworkApr 21, 20067Hostel lacked the humour and suspense required to make it a classic horror film, but it's a not a bad one. I guess most people aren't familair with the genre after it's decline since the 80's, and mark Hostel down as result. I think they're missing the point in the same way that people miss the point of the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre or Last House On the Left.
-
-
JohnK.Apr 21, 20065Reality is much more terrifying, HollyWood writers suck, The only thing HollyWood hasn't done is a King Kong Vs Jason Vs Freddie Vs Rocky fim. Sincerely. A-Tetrapod
-
-
GarageBandApr 21, 20066
-
-
JacobY.Apr 24, 20060I would have to say this is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Don't waist your time watching it, there isn't even a hint of story until about 45 minutes into it. This film was alot of talk with no delivery, cabin fever was good but this is just pathetic in every way.
-
-
MarkH.Jun 18, 20060The first half a very stupid teen movie with all clichés - the rest a desperate attempt to make all previous chainsaw massacres look like "finding nemo". At the end a big question: How sick does one have to be to find the most perverted kinds of torture entertaining?
-
-
AdrianF.Jun 24, 200610
-
-
AaronB.Jun 28, 20065
-
-
75It's obligatory for a horror film to feature exploitative sex as an appetizer, but Roth, even as he fulfills the sleaze imperative, does something shrewder: He mocks his heroes, presenting them as cold-eyed horndog jerks who fail to see that they've wandered into an entire country of exploitation.
-
70Hostel may become something of a classic among Fangoria magazine's readership, acolytes of George Romero and audiences who thought "Saw II" was for babies.
-
60Although he damn near slanders an entire country - expect poor Slovakia's tourism industry to take a hit - Roth is not an unskilled ringleader of gory crisis moments, or breathless escapes. The squeamish should simply stay away, but carnage queens will appreciate some of Roth's less grisly, even amusing details.