- Studio: Lions Gate Films
- Release Date: Jan 6, 2006
User Score
4.9
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 299 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 149 out of 299
-
Mixed: 20 out of 299
-
Negative: 130 out of 299
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
MarkC.Aug 20, 20063this moive is not scary at all it just freakin nasty it is very boring it has no suspense.You already know whats going to happen before it happens now can u tell me how lame it that?
-
-
AmandaP.Jan 6, 20063Was not scary at all!!
-
-
RyanH.Jan 3, 20070One of the the worst movies I have ever seen. I think i was watching a stupid teenage trip movie that went wrong and had added gore for fun. It is the standard gory movie with the stupidest characters who set themselves up to be killed with one person making it out alive.
-
-
RD.Apr 4, 20074
-
-
danieli.Jan 10, 20061It's a pretty pathetic plot line with little or no back story. The movie is not all deep, with only scenes that will shock the audience. The first half is a glorified porno, while the last 45 minutes are made as groteskly as possible. If you like movies with no plot and horrible lines this Hostel was made for you.
-
-
MelissaJan 7, 20060Very disturbing and degrating movie towards women. Definitely not a date movie. The gore aspect was just too much they showed peoples faces being burned with blow torches. It sucked.
-
-
WendyJan 7, 20060A movie made for juvenile teenagers [Ed: uhhh..]. With the garbage currently playing it should do well at the box office. But the truth is it is pretty bad. Move over Mr. Jackson, Mr. Q has joined you as a one-trick pony. Avoid.
-
-
NickiC.Jan 8, 20062
-
-
BrookL.Jan 8, 20062The first hour was Eurotrip, of which I'm not a fan. The second hour, for about 5 minutes, gave the impression that it might do okay. But no, somehow Roth managed to take one of the best original plots of the year and completely screw it up. The score was absolutely terrible, the movie seemed like a joke. I was so disappointed, you willl be too. Avoid this.
-
-
MichaelB.Jan 9, 20060
-
-
NickA.Sep 8, 20061
-
-
ABSep 9, 20072It is surprising that "Hostel" was advertised as a particularly shocking horror film; it turns out to be standard horror fare: it is boring, fairly gory, and has no plot whatsoever. And, of course, it is not scary. Its only merit is that, although it is sharply degrading (especially toward women and children), it is not as offensive as its preposterous sequel.
-
-
CarlW.Jan 13, 20060If you're going to put all your eggs in one basket, it should be a pretty gory basket... gorier than a few chopped-off fingers and a cheesy hanging eyeball. I would've given this a 1 if the obnoxious main character had been tortured and killed.
-
-
ChrisA.Jan 21, 20061
-
-
JoeM.Jan 6, 20060
-
-
AndyJan 7, 20061I don't know what crack these other reviewers are smoking. This is not the best horror film made. This is not at all traumatizing. It is not even the goriest movie 'EVA'. Devoid of tension or suspense but lots of gore mixed with fresh harvests of European jiggly-tits. Wait for the DVD.
-
-
ShoshanahM.Feb 28, 20060Worst movie I've seen this year. Not so much a horror film, more of a glorified snuff film. The filmmaker seemed only interested in how many times he could gross out the audience, rather than building up genuine fear and suspense. You could not *pay* me to watch this movie again.
-
-
CoryApr 21, 20062
-
-
JakeK.Apr 21, 20062I really dont get how anyone can say how this movie was gory. I thought there wasnt that much of it. [***SPOILERS***] i mean , when the guy takes that electric screw driver over to the guy and puts it in his leg, u dont even see it. the only good part of this movie was when there was all of this naked hott chicks but other wise, it was horrible.
-
-
MikM.Apr 24, 20063Poor story, weak acting, and a couple torture scenes. Not worth 2 hours of your life (let alone rental or purchase price).
-
-
OllyF.Apr 3, 20064A movie that aimed to scare but only shocked using over the top gore. Pretty brainless stuff without any real watchable factors.
-
-
DrunkenMasterJan 11, 20061It's total poop. Strictly for sadists w/ severe learning disabilities.
-
-
KingChadJan 15, 20060Sorry little boys and girls but this film really sucked. Not worthy of your time or money. Avoid.
-
-
TroyS.Jan 16, 20061Utterly worthless piece of gratuitous junk. An embarassment to the film industry. It should have been rated NC-17.
-
-
DaveK.Jan 19, 20060How did this piece of garbage get an "r" rating? Very predictible plot; gratuitous sex and violence; an utterly filthy and disgusting journey into the twisted minds of Roth and Tarentino. Don't go!
-
-
CoryC.Jan 9, 20060Not good. Not enough horror. It took an hour to get to something at least bit scary. The first hour is basically American Pie and all u see are naked chicks. No time is really spent in the tortue rooms. Overall, not scary and not that gory as i thought.
-
-
artpJan 9, 20060The whole first part of the movie is awefully directed. The rest is glorified violence with no purpose but to shock audiences. This movie is a disgrace to the art of movie making.
-
-
ChrissyFeb 11, 20063Perhaps this movie would've been better, if the completely inexplicable (and dreadful) comedy pieces hadn't been pushed into the dialogue. Not only that, but the acting seemed have an unrealistic, and almost dull effect. Nudity is also quite overused in this movie. If you'd like to go and see a torturesome, comedic porno-flick, then this is the movie for you.
-
-
JimQ.Apr 23, 20060I want my 95 minutes of life back.
-
-
AquamanMay 19, 20063I am the kind of guy who likes the typical horror movie. When i came across this at the movie store, i thought "hey, this looks good", i was incorrect. I just could not summon up the strength to find this movie enjoyable.
-
-
[Anonymous]Jun 17, 20060This movie is stupid, it has no plot, its not scary, its just disgusting. The first hour or so is ok, but after that, its one of the dumbest movies I have ever seen.
-
-
ZackO.Jun 27, 20060why why why? the first half hour is pretty much cliche softcore horror movie porn. after that, it becomes a twisted and meaningless film of needless torture and pain. there is no reason for this movie to exist. the eye mayonaise really did it for me. i actually laughed out loud when the blatantly fake thousand island dressing splurged of the asian's eye socket.
-
-
JonathanD.Jun 7, 20064
-
-
MarkW.Jan 11, 20060I was expecting something alot more scarier. The extreme violence wasnt something that scared you after you left the theatre. You just feel like you wasted two hours.
-
-
M.EscherJan 14, 20060
-
-
TonydannieJan 15, 20062
-
-
GrantN.Jan 16, 20063If you enjoy this movie then you have no taste in movies. The first 45 minutes is just sex and the director uses excessive gore to mask incompatence and a lack of tension.
-
-
BobbyJ.Jan 23, 20060
-
-
RyanJ.Feb 24, 20064
-
-
JacobY.Apr 24, 20060I would have to say this is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Don't waist your time watching it, there isn't even a hint of story until about 45 minutes into it. This film was alot of talk with no delivery, cabin fever was good but this is just pathetic in every way.
-
-
MarkH.Jun 18, 20060The first half a very stupid teen movie with all clichés - the rest a desperate attempt to make all previous chainsaw massacres look like "finding nemo". At the end a big question: How sick does one have to be to find the most perverted kinds of torture entertaining?
-
-
S.BannonJul 26, 20063I knew the film would suck. But it was supposed to be totally offensive and gruesome, so I thought I should atleast watch it. Not even close. No suspense, no twists, even the gore was lame. Total waste of time.
-
-
SarahNov 12, 20070This was the worst movie I have ever seen in my entire life. There was barely any gore or violence until the end. The whole beginning of the movie is sex. It is pretty much a soft core porno. It is so disgusting. I would not recommend it to anyone at all.
-
-
Aug 13, 20100
-
Jul 7, 20112Let me say to start that I am NOT the target audience for this movie. This moive is more for the gore for the sake of gore crowd, anyone else watching this movie has chosen to punish themselves. This movie has no higher purpose, no greater wisdom, no real story. Hack and slash, hack and slash.
-
75It's obligatory for a horror film to feature exploitative sex as an appetizer, but Roth, even as he fulfills the sleaze imperative, does something shrewder: He mocks his heroes, presenting them as cold-eyed horndog jerks who fail to see that they've wandered into an entire country of exploitation.
-
70Hostel may become something of a classic among Fangoria magazine's readership, acolytes of George Romero and audiences who thought "Saw II" was for babies.
-
60Although he damn near slanders an entire country - expect poor Slovakia's tourism industry to take a hit - Roth is not an unskilled ringleader of gory crisis moments, or breathless escapes. The squeamish should simply stay away, but carnage queens will appreciate some of Roth's less grisly, even amusing details.