- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Oct 29, 1999
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
67Trash, but always just a little creepier than you expect.
-
60The effects never really get ahead of the characters or the script's layered personality.
-
50The kind of horror movie that's not a bit scary and quite a bit gross.
-
50Low-budget, high-camp.
-
41Aims low and cheats on an ending, but meanwhile it's a bottom-shelf hoot.
-
40For horror fans in a forgiving mood, it's an adequate fear fix.
-
40Still nothing but a gussied-up B movie.
-
38Contains too little of the original's campy spirit and too many whistles, bells, explosions and screams.
-
38Fun for less than 30 of the 80-minute running time.
-
30It's all a bit of overkill.
-
25Slow-moving, yawn-inducing remake.
-
Soon enough, it becomes clear how much this movie disrespects both the audience and the genre.
-
20Everyone in the film is either annoying or unpleasant.
-
10All the special effects in the world cannot compensate for an inability to generate tension, establish and sustain pace or create any character whose survival is worth rooting for.
-
0If your name's on the marquee, chances are your agent's already dead.
-
I would rather feed Jesse Helms a rancid peanut butter sandwich, and then have him slowly lick my face off, than sit through House on Haunted Hill again.
-
Lucky for you, it won't cost a thing to get up and walk out at any point after the credits.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 5 out of 7
-
Mixed: 0 out of 7
-
Negative: 2 out of 7