Mixed or average reviews - based on 40 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 19 out of 40
  2. Negative: 5 out of 40
  1. 38
    This messy, disappointing, self-important and utterly humorless version of the Marvel comic book character may be the toughest flick with a green protagonist to sit through since "The Grinch."
  2. 30
    The Hulk goes on for two hours and 20 minutes and there's not a stirring or exciting moment in it...At last, a comic-book movie that National Public Radio listeners can be proud to take their kids to see.
  3. 30
    Belabored, ostentatious, overlong behemoth.
  4. The movie is bulky and inarticulate, leaving behind a trail of wreckage and incoherence.
  5. In future Lee can best serve his versatility by never doing anything like this again.
User Score

Mixed or average reviews- based on 247 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 61 out of 134
  2. Negative: 54 out of 134
  1. Sep 23, 2011
    Ang Lee's version of "Hulk" is different from those dreamy western versions. It has a prominent morale that is appropriate for its name with splendid acting. Don't criticize, but realize. Full Review »
  2. Nov 3, 2013
    Ang Lee's version of the Hulk is very long and fuelled with over the top action. Eric Bana stars as Bruce Banner and the Hulk. First of all, this is the most average superhero movies that I have ever seen. It's corny and long with some good action scenes. The atmosphere is tense and great but the story and dialogue also the acting is corny and bad. Ang Lee makes Hulk take great leaps and awesome helicopter takedowns but the acting, direction and story is very dumb. Lee makes a very well action sequenced but corny film that should only be watched by hardcore Hulk or action, blowing, Eric Bana, more blowing up and even more blowing up fans. Full Review »
  3. Jul 15, 2013
    Holk realmente no se muestra como es hasta el increĆ­ble Hulk en 2008 creo, sin embargo no es una descepcion........................................... Full Review »