- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 14, 2007
User Score
7.0
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 465 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 348 out of 465
-
Mixed: 51 out of 465
-
Negative: 66 out of 465
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Feb 4, 20121
-
MickD.Jan 11, 20081
-
-
Oct 1, 20112This movie failed to keep my attention. Not only that the movie became very unrealistic. I watched this movie as it was rated as a vampire movie but it clearly was not.
-
TonyB.Apr 4, 20083A tremendous production design is just about its only virtue...surprisingly boring in spots.
-
-
ChrisW.Jan 3, 20081
-
-
KenH.Mar 20, 20084Deeply flawed after the first hour. Really a shame because the movie had enormous potential. Once gets a sense the folks making the movie had no idea what kind of story to tell. The CGI animations are surprisingly bad -- what the heck happened there?
-
-
BrianH.Apr 2, 20081Wow, I wasn't expecting too much and it was even worse than I thought. Every 10 minutes something happens in the script that just baffles me. Pure Hollywood trash and Will Smith is just playing himself again. barf.
-
-
EmilyM.May 27, 20084
-
-
NigelM.Jun 2, 20080Terrible rip-off of 28 days later with 10 times the budget, but none of the atmosphere. The script is clunking, Will Smith has none of his usual charm and the CGI ruins it completely. There are some nonsensical bits of talking to shop dummies, which were unintentionally comical, but mostly this is just a dull re-hash of very tired post-world- destruction themes done without flare or imagination.
-
-
DuncanM.Jun 3, 20084
-
-
LiefS.Jan 3, 20083horrible cg and ur usual will smith singing along to bob marley moments. the opening scene with the empty time square was the best done part of the movie, if your into movies like these, instead of looking at cgi i-robots with skin, watch 28 days or weeks later, they r both lightyears ahead of this film
-
-
PaulJan 3, 20081The fact that the producers of this film changed the end from that of the book show that they have no understanding of it and so render this film utterly pointless. Such a waste. Also hearing such a wonderful book compared to excrement such as 28 days later should be painful to anyone who has actually read it.
-
-
AnnoymousJul 7, 20084Not as good as I expected to be. It was too short and the ending is terrible and unsatisfying. Really overrated. Also the CGI effects were unimpressive.
-
-
alkebulanpMay 29, 20092A total waste of smith's talent. ur basic night creatures from hell re-make w little imagination or creativity on display. too many scenes filmed in near total darkness, but then, there's little illumination in the entire film.
-
-
MaxM.Dec 10, 20070Do yourself a favor and don't go see it. I wasted 100 minutes of my life watching Will Smith walking through his house, dating dummies, and driving his van around the city.
-
-
JohnJ.Dec 12, 20070I cannot believe people think that Will Smith can act. He is ridiculous in this movie. Being in shape and being able to run at lot, does not mean one can act. Get a grip. I thought it'd be exciting and cuting edge like Children of Men was last year, but it was so lame. If you've seen the trailer, don't waste your time, that's better than the movie.
-
-
RubinM.Dec 17, 20071The movie sucked. Its a good thing that didn't paid for it. But, either way I spent 90min of my life watching this stupid movie, therefore, I'm thinking about seeking some sort of reparation from Paramount Pictures.
-
-
willsucksDec 19, 20070What a stinker , not worth a penny to go see . I was so bored , yawn not even worth my review.
-
-
DominickMDec 29, 20071bad CGI bad acting terrible story
-
-
MPDec 30, 20072Ok up until three quarters of the way through. Then, it just looses its bottle. Why don't people maiking these 'films based on a book' stick to the original narrative more closely. Don't waste you money on going to the cinema to watch this, buy the book instead its a million and one times better!
-
-
lulufryJan 13, 20081boring, illogical movie with a pompous title. total swiss cheese. stole my money.
-
-
ChrisJ.Jan 17, 20082Been there, Seen that bought the T-Shirt.This type of material has been done before only better by Danny Boyle in 28 Days Later. The comments that this movie doesn't know what it wants to be are right on the money and this movie is confusing and not well explained even with the countless number of flashbacks.
-
-
JohnNJan 22, 20082
-
-
AndyB.Mar 25, 20082
-
-
OssobucoMar 29, 20084Why do I have this nagging feeling that will smith might turn out to be a decent actor should he stop being so aware of being will smith. If he stopped choosing bad hollow movies to star in couldn't hurt. Some sloppy CGI to booth.
-
-
MobiusMar 31, 20083Good points: Smith and the dog manage to hold the film together and give a believable performance of being alone in the city. Bad Points: Awful CGI infected creatures. having Faith in god pushed in your face. Oh did i mention crap CGI Animation.
-
-
jackvOct 12, 20090Awful, I liked smith in fresh prince and all his wacky nonsense movies such as Wild Wild West and Men in Black, but after this an I, Robot, he needs to be run out of Hollywood by a torch carrying mob. A monstrosity of a film that dishonors another great book.
-
-
MrAgnostosFeb 18, 20101
-
-
TerryC.Dec 10, 20073The point is totally missed, Will Smith plays in a clunky execution that is complexity plotted.
-
-
RogerM.Dec 14, 20070This is most likely the worst movie I've ever paid to watch. Everything is stretched to insane boredom. It's totally fiction, and why the "hero" have to end up as he did, escapes my wit. Nothing worth mentioning in this movie. Unless you buy the evangelical twist at the end. I wouldn't have seen this through if I went alone. Ouch. Ouch. Ouch.
-
-
PedroJuniorDec 14, 20070It's NOT a performance if you're acting like yourself! Didn't the Kevin Costner experiment teach us anything?
-
-
WillL.Dec 15, 20074What a waste. Very simplistic story that could a been made as a TV movie of the week. To think I wanted to see this in IMAX, thank goodness it was sold out and saved me some cash.
-
-
JasminW.Dec 15, 20072Week plot, poor logic, cheap scare instead of real suspense. Not worth the $9 or $10 bucks to see this movie in the theater. Don't bring your girlfriends to this movie as a date. I saw several couples walked out on this one.
-
-
PHB.Dec 16, 20073Horrible ending. If ruined the other 2/3s of the movie for me. Did it remind anybody of the wicked terrible ending to the movie "Signs"?
-
-
MovieCriticDec 16, 20070Horrible, noisy. This is film is a crude advertisement for medical products and services, by its scary dramatization of "virus epidemics", extending the theme of the earlier film, "28 Days", however, "28 Days" was skillfully done and entertaining. "I Am Legend" is garbage. From now on, just seeing Will Smith's face in an interview sends me into shock. This film is the epidemic.
-
-
LewisP.Dec 16, 20073
-
-
JSDec 17, 20073Note that the top four ratings for this film are all from New York sources. Take those out, and the movie scores much lower.
-
-
RHowDec 17, 20074I found the movie to be boring. The "Omega Man" was much more entertaining...in a 70's kinda way.
-
-
JoeB.Dec 17, 20071
-
-
CharlieM.Dec 26, 20072I thought it was terrible, yes the CGI and effects were really quite good, but the plot and the ending were terrible. I would not recommend it.
-
-
GayleL.Dec 28, 20071Not much dialogue here! Just a silly zombie movie. Boring....and disappointing.
-
-
ACDec 18, 20080
-
-
ChrisR.Jan 28, 20084When a movie takes itself this seriously, it should pay more attention to plausibility. May have had a better chance with me had I not had the kids with me. Will Smith is a bright spot, and the idea is good, but I left with a strong suspicion that if I ever forced myself to watch it again there would be dozens of missteps within the plot. For serious genre fans only, IMO.
-
-
RobV.Jan 28, 20080The only thing worse than the movie itself is noticing that deep down within the story is the dead seed of something potentially brilliant. Save yourself the trouble of asking for a refund and pass this one up. It's Signs all over again.
-
-
T.A.Apr 13, 20084
-
-
doiknoyunopeMay 27, 20091
-
-
EdyC.Dec 11, 20073
-
-
TracyJacksonDec 15, 20070Lack of any logic or common sense in the plot. Wasted a good actor Will Smith in this movie. I feel sorry for him to be associated with this film. What a waste of time and money to see it in the theater.
-
-
BillyS.Dec 17, 20073I Am Nauseous.
-
-
ColbyS.Dec 17, 20073I can't be the only one who saw this as a blatant ripoff of 28 Days Later. Come on. And Will Smith is only popular because chicks dig his body.
-
-
AdamK.Dec 17, 20072
-
-
ArleneK.Dec 18, 20070Terrible movie!
-
-
PhilB.Dec 21, 20070The only good part of this movie is when you get to see SHREK. Other than that ....it sucks. Too bad I cant put -1.
-
-
GnyquF.Dec 22, 20074
-
-
PotsosDec 25, 20073
-
-
mathewB.Dec 29, 20070Completely ineffective. Bad special effects, and unintersting. Smith has nothing ti do, and film does not address the meaning of humanity at all. So all you have left are dull monolouges and very poor action sequences.
-
-
AnnR.Dec 29, 20074The first 1/3 of the movie was good. Then it became stupid. The story unraveled and became senseless with no path. You left feeling cheated, not entertained.
-
-
Mar 20, 20114
-
May 2, 20134This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Jun 3, 20132
-
70Smith, sporting a newly buffed physique, delivers an extraordinary performance as a man slowly coming unglued under the strain of no human contact and a constantly alternating role of hunter and prey.
-
70Remarkably eerie yet annoyingly larded with cheap horror-film shock effects, I Am Legend stands as an effective but also irksome adaptation of Richard Matheson's classic 1954 sci-fi novel.
-
80The first two thirds and change of I Am Legend is terrific mindless fun: crackerjack action with gnashing vampires barely glimpsed (and scarier for that) and how’d-they-do-that New York locations that retroactively justify the traffic jams.