User Score
6.3 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 33 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 21 out of 33
  2. Negative: 8 out of 33

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. Dec 23, 2011
    3
    I want to like it so much, but it wasn't funny and its computer animation let me down and it had a hit and miss premise that let me down and the voice performances were boring. I give this movie 27%.
  2. giren
    Sep 17, 2008
    5
    Worth to watch. But not smart enough to be an animated movie on this era.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  3. JayH.
    Jan 18, 2009
    6
    Entertaining, amusing and creative, great score, fine script and enjoyable animation. Good voice overs. Curiously though it's not very memorable.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. Mona
    Oct 3, 2008
    8
    This was a wonderful family film. It is humorous not only for little kids but adults as well. The movie has an interesting and unique plot that develops its character's well. I would recommend this to people who generally like animated movies and are looking for a good family fun film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. ChadS.
    Sep 20, 2008
    7
    In the tradition of Valerie Martin's 1990 Nebula-award-winning novel "Mary Reilly"(later adapted to the screen by Stephen Frears), an igor, like the nameless servant in Robert Louis Stevenson's "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde", gets to be the protagonist of his own narrative, stepping out, at long last, from being stereotyped, a stock character usually in possession of a low I.Q., who was first seen in James Whale's original "Frankenstein"(there is no mention of Igor in the 1817 Mary Shelley novella). The mad scientist, even in Mel Brooks' parodic "Young Frankenstein", is portrayed as the smartest man in the castle; but "Igor", in the film's most clever conceit, reimagines these mental giants as idiots(Dr. Glickenstein, voiced by John Cleese) and plagiarists(Dr. Schadenfreude, voiced by Eddie Izzard). This igor is like the Will Hunting of igors; he may possess a hump, but he's "wicked smaht", stuck in a malevolent world of chowderheads. Being that there are no igors of the fairer sex, and since he's straight, when Igor(John Cusack) plays God, he creates woman. He creates Kirstie Alley, but this former lab-assistant calls her Eva(Molly Shannon). His monster is an actress; a not-so-inside joke about how all female thespians have the potential to be divas. While "Igor" works as an old-school Hollywood picture about the entertainment biz, like most 3D-animated films not made by Pixar, however, the filmic elements are too post-modernist by half; in other words, too many pop culture references spoil the soup. When the showtunes kick in, it's like watching Tim Burton's take on "Moulin Rouge". But give "Igor" some credit for being insightful about how popular film, historically, and to this day, has a tendency to misrepresent people of all persuasions, in particular, this class of igors. Igor doesn't walk, or talk, the way he's supposed to; the way we're pre-conditioned to accept his kind, as servants, as people on the margins. See what the film is getting at? Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. RobertA.
    Feb 24, 2009
    0
    This movie was really awful. We have movie night every Saturday for the whole family and this doesn't make the grade. We watched about 1/2 of the movie and shut it off based on everyone's vote. Thumbs down.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. DaveT.
    Oct 24, 2008
    7
    Maybe a little too clever for the kids, but the girlfriend and I really enjoyed both the corny story and the in jokes. The Burton-esque setting was superb.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. MarkR.
    Sep 13, 2008
    2
    Not suitable for children, or really anyone for that matter. With good voice talent, competent animation and a pre-halloween season to play within, this 1.5 hour tour has much going for it, but like Frankenstein's monster, it turns out to be over-sized mess that scares children and horrifies adults. Having received free passes to see it a week in advance, I don't like to be unkind, but having made the mistake of taken young children (ages 2.5 and 4.5) to the movie, I'd like to take this early opportunity to dissuade others from doing the same. But if you like to expose your youth to slapstick without the funny, countless suicide jokes and lowbrow dialogue ranging from name-calling to hate-speech, then who am I to stop you. Those drawn by the voice talents of John Cleese (playing here a mad scientist reminiscent of the schoolteacher from the cover art of Pink Floyd's the Wall) will be gravely disappointed, as Mr. Cleese evidently had the good sense to leave the movie after the first 10 minutes. If only I had been wise enough to do the same. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  9. EricR.
    Sep 17, 2008
    10
    I LOVED this movie!! I was lucky enough to be invited to a sneak preview and went with less than great expectations, and was blown away. There are too many 'lairs' to talk about to give the film full credit, but I will say that after seeing this film, I want to see it again to catch the jokes I missed when the audience was laughing. And the political sidenotes did not go unnoticed. There was a tough of George Bush in King Malbert, who looks like a cockroach. But more than that, the movie shows a take on good vs. evil in a different light. Sometimes, you need something created out of the ether to show you whats wrong with the world, and Igor discovers those ills via Eva, played by Molly Shannon, who helps in exposing the truth behind malaria and who is in charge. I recommend this movie!!! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. MikeT.
    Sep 18, 2008
    10
    Great movie...very funny w/ good animation.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. BethesdaM.
    Sep 19, 2008
    10
    Charming animated film that tells us Igor's side of the Frankenstein story. Once in a while, the little guy wins!
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  12. BryceL.
    Sep 20, 2008
    8
    Original, cut out the cliches, and was certainly clever, but the comedy was "not laughing through the whole movie funny".
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. MaryA.
    Sep 15, 2008
    10
    Lucky enough to get tix to the sneak preview! I loved it. Fun to watch...loved the dry,smart, subtle humor. Animation was beautiful. My husband and I keep quoting it and laughing...the sign of great movie!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. ChadM.
    Sep 15, 2008
    10
    I was forced to go to this as a favor to a co-worker who was given preview tickets and didn't want to go alone. Pleasantly suprised.. laughing so loudly that it got awkward! This is a funny one!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. VincentD.
    Sep 17, 2008
    10
    I really enjoyed this movie. The animation, the music score, the writing all worked. The characters were funny and interesting and the voice cast is second to none. My kids liked it also, highly recommended.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. RichardG.
    Sep 18, 2008
    10
    This movie is funny. Good for all ages.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. HyperS.
    Jan 24, 2009
    6
    Igor was an interesting character, but the supporting cast I found annoying and heroic trio was a cliche cast of characters both in attitude and behavior. "Brain" was annoyingly stupid and a poorly designed character to make him likeable. That rat rabbit got on my nerves with his comments and voice over. (good actor, but maybe not suited for animation voice overs). And the leading lady... the monster was obnoxious as well on the order of an American Idol reject. Sorry, too many good animated films out there for this Tim Burton knock-off to deserve a 7 or higher. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. Davtom
    Feb 22, 2009
    1
    Voices and Music poorly cast and chosen. Found the actors to not hit the right feelings to properly portray the given character. The music in many scenes was distracting and again didn't fit the scene as a whole. At times had to fast forward because I found it so awful.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. Jan 17, 2011
    10
    Great, yet unfortunately, underrated film. Good laughs, voice talent, art, it was creative, and in all: Thoroughly enjoyable.
  20. Mar 23, 2012
    10
    The animation is probably the worst you'll ever see. In contrast to similar films, this movie has a terrible plot, unengaging characters, and a theme so boring you'll want to throw the disc away.
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 19 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 19
  2. Negative: 6 out of 19
  1. Reviewed by: Justin Chang
    30
    With its belabored gags, misfired pop-culture references and garish visuals crammed together like so many disjointed body parts, this manic kidpic cranks up the annoy-o-meter early on and rarely lets up.
  2. Reviewed by: Stephen Farber
    50
    Although the visuals tantalize and the actors providing the voices add a lot of sass, the result is only so-so.
  3. Reviewed by: Adam Markovitz
    50
    The visuals are a kick; the groan-inducing dialogue isn't.