Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
In the Valley of Elah
User Score
7.1 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 56 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 56
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 56
  3. Negative: 7 out of 56

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

view
per page
  1. LanceD.
    Feb 26, 2008
    2
    Intriguing yet disappointing. Haggis did not explore Tommy Jones realization that his "good boy" son had morphed into a man performing unspeakable deeds while serving in an Army which he had influenced his son to join. The ending with the flag and the school janitor made me LOL so hard. It was so indignant and ungrateful to our troops and country. I have completely lost hope for Hollywood drama movies. If they cannot realize that the problem is the PRODUCT and not the buyers for the slumping movie industry than they are truly disconnected and have a mental disease. Enough with the Anti-America, Anti-War, Anti-Republican movies. We get it, Hollywood is overflowing with liberals.… Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  2. CydneyB.
    Sep 14, 2007
    5
    Except for Tommy Lee Jones' performance, this is a predictable piece of Hollywood schlock. Treachly music at end... Charlize Theron is just plain boring, and Susan Sarandon is wasted. What a snore.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  3. MINTONmedia
    Nov 5, 2007
    10
    I'm not a Haggis fan and have found his work consistently overrated by critics. To me, "Crash" was a muddled parable and "Million Dollar Baby" a wallow-in-it disaster. But in this film, he (with the brilliant acting assistance of Jones, Theron, Sarandon and everyone else) has hit one out of the park. By telling the story via an intriguing mystery plotline and rooting it deeply in the flawed character Jones plays, he makes a "political" statement without politics...and the film works because of it.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. DavidR.
    Dec 4, 2007
    0
    I was thinking that the President of Iran was the money behind the film. The "America is the evil empire" crowd now has their own classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. JoseA.
    Feb 5, 2008
    9
    I think all of you Americans,who dislike this movie are completely wrong. It doesn't target,in first place,your government,even not your army,but the "beast" of war itself.Brave film Mr Haggis.And above all brave ending"SPOILER"making Tommy lee s character even more responsible than Gov/army/himself for what happened to his son.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. JayH.
    Feb 12, 2008
    8
    7.5/10. Solid story, superbly acted by Charlize Theron and Tommy Lee Jones. Susan Sarandon excels as well. Heartwrenching at times, good score and well edited. Powerful and extremely well made. It's always interesting.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. ChristianP.
    Feb 18, 2008
    7
    I really enjoyed this movie while I watched it, but in the end I was left unfulfilled...or was it too filled?? Haggis could have made the end more ambiguous and left us hanging more, but -- just like he did in Crash, he tries to make us believe something, or feel something, or think something. He tries too hard to move his audience in a certain way. This could have been a "10" but loses its steam in the end. Jones is fantastic. Also, if you write this off as being "anti-American," you are lazy. Heavy-handed? Yes. Anti-American? Not by a long shot.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. NormD.
    Feb 19, 2008
    8
    worth high marks just for willingness to show somewhat realistic, morally compromised, yet sympathetic characters.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. ChadS.
    Feb 22, 2008
    8
    Hank Deerfield(Tommy Lee Jones) is an analog man living in a digital world. He looks like a figure in an Edward Hopper painting as he stands at the copy machine. The truck Hank drives could've been an object parked out of frame in Hopper's signature work "Nighthawks", an oil on canvas, typical of the cinema-minded artist's obsession with people in relationship to their environment. Hank tries. He can operate a computer. But the immodesty of our times often leaves him at a loss for words(e.g. the topless waitress, a septugenarian like him, at the diner bar). Time doesn't stand still, especially at an army base, even though the protocol, the haircuts, and the congeniality of the GIs remain the sam. Looks, however, can be deceiving; as they say, you can't judge a book by its cover. Hank will come to learn that C.S. Lewis might be more knowable than his own flesh and blood. There are crashes, the same racial crashes between Whites and Hispanics like in "Crash", but it's the generational crash between the Iraqi war veterans and veterans from our fathers' wars that distinguishes "In the Valley of Elah" from this filmmaker's last hurrah. An interpretation of the vivisected body that's discovered in the field could be construed as the analogue version of the soldier's digital form being pixelated to death by the unforgiving Iraqi sun. Mike's body(and soul; because of his inhumane treatment towards the enemy) seems to be literally coming apart on his father's laptop. Hank can hardly recognize his own son. Because he's an analog man living in a digital world. Hank Deerfield is the anti-"Walker: Texas Ranger".… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. KevinM.
    Mar 1, 2008
    4
    I enjoyed the movie and understand the challenges our troops face when returning from a war zone. How dare the makers of this movie determine that this country is in distress. There are thousands of proud soldiers who come home and lead perfect lives. You could have hit a home run if the flag would have been raised and flown right side up. Instead you mock our country and what our flag stands for and the millions of lives lost so that you could end what was a good movie into a total bust. I am taking the movie back today as I will not own a movie that makes a statement like that.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. PeterK.
    Mar 12, 2008
    10
    This movie deserves an 11. Most people miss the elemental power of Tommy Lee Jones's smoldering performance and the depth of dramatic irony the writing has instilled in the part of Hank Deerfield, a father unraveling the horrific and mesmerizing truths of his son's disappearance which rivals anything that Sophocles did 2,500 years ago. This film, largely ignored by all but the critics, is one of the best to come out in decades.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. MoeH.
    Mar 28, 2008
    0
    I saw this in the cinema, and i almost died mid-way through, i left near the end of the movie, it was mind numbingly boring, all the way through. The actors barely say anything during the whole thing, nothing intresting happens, just remains the same, the whole time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. DeanD.
    Aug 30, 2008
    9
    I am neither a Democrat nor a Republican; I am a Canadian. Now that we have that straight, I can't be labelled a liberal or a patriot. Too much attention of the reviewers was directed towards the upside down flag symbolizing America in distress. Some thought this was an anti-American action because it disrespects American soldiers. However, I was impressed that the director had Jones, after he sees his son's picture of his squad, place only his son's military portait on the dresser and not the picture of his son with his squad. This shows Jones's character was still proud of his son but he did not agree America should be in Iraq. He believes that this is destroying America's youth. Even if they arrive back home in one piece, they have lost a part of their humanity. That is why he places the American flag upside down; it represents that America's youth returning from Iraq are in distress. I would put this movie in the same category as Tom Cruise's "Fourth of July" because both movies speak to the young Americans' souls that were irreparably damaged by a war in a faraway land that few could find on a map before hostilities began.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. EmilieM.
    Jan 24, 2009
    10
    A heartrending tale about what war does to even good young men. Not an anti-Iraq film, as some critics complain, but a film about the dangers of war many of us never contemplate. Acting and direction was brilliant.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. ClaireM.
    Jan 26, 2009
    10
    One of the best films I've seen in a,ong time. Deserves an 11. Tommy Lee Jones is marvelous in the film and Charlize Theron is very good as a woman struggling for respect in a sexist environment. This is a sad, subtle and very good movie, designed to make you feel the impact of large events on little lives...
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  16. TimoV
    Mar 15, 2009
    6
    Suburbian horrors of the warfare hit Tommy Lee Jones and his wife, as their kid goes missing. In the Valley of Elah is a Iraq-topic film with a twist.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. EssiS
    Mar 17, 2009
    7
    I liked the simplicity of this film. Tommy Lee Jones was perfectly cast and he gave an amazing performance. Well deserved Oscar nomination. Also the anti-war theme was written beautifully in the script.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. Roger
    Sep 16, 2007
    10
    This is an intense and powerful film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. DamonC.
    Sep 16, 2007
    2
    Another schlocky, contrived piece from Haggis, this time with an oh-so predictable political message. When will he leave pretensions aside and tell a real story?
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. Nathan
    Sep 19, 2007
    4
    Tommy Lee Jones is very very good in this movie. The film however lacks any depth. It plays on the surface of tragedy without sinking its teeth in it. There is a good movie that is dying to get out. You can see it in Jones performance, I wish the crime drama was left in the dust it buckles and eventually folds by the end.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. JoelM.
    Sep 21, 2007
    8
    Terrific acting from the entire cast with dramatic photography. This is a heartwrenching, but not corny, story of the effect of war, and in particular the Iraqi war, and what it is doing to the country on a real personal level. parents.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. BillyS.
    Sep 22, 2007
    6
    Tommy Lee Jones gives a remarkable Oscar worthy performance in "In The Valley Of Elah", it's just too bad that the movie doesn't. The acting in the movie is the only thing that elevates it above a very poorly executed anti-war movie that ruins its best dramatic scenes with cheap symbolism. Haggis made a beautiful tapestry about race with Crash, but this time he just throws a big old Iraqi blanket over us without trying to be subtle. In the Valley of Elah is my first big disappointment for a movie with such high anticaption. I hope the Academy will atleast remember Tommy Lee in No Country for Old Men come nominations, he's a great actor and deserving.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. SteveG.
    Sep 23, 2007
    8
    ALL performances were excellent and held true to their characters and their director's intent. No cliches, no given overly dramatic gestures. No added violence. A bit slow at times with it's solitude and singular vision, my belief is Haggis wanted to draw you in to a world if solitude and aloneness. We are all alone with this war in IRAQ and the movie touches on the theme of losing more than just a war. It becomes a broader question. When Susan Sarandon walks away from what's left of her son the camera stays on her and Tommy Lee's walking. Her outstretched hand the entire way says more than words could EVER say. BRILLIANT MOMENT Haggis and Sarandon! The cinematography was incredible and very palpable with it's bleached tones and very simple, bright almost shimmery angles.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. DottieC.
    Sep 23, 2007
    9
    My sister and I just got home from seeing the movie and having coffee after. I think the film shows more than a "predictable" ending! A proud retired military man, a wife beaten down with grief from losing a son, a couple getting by. This "proud" father sees his son in the light of reality. A young man so changed and having done things his father could never imagined he would be capable of. He had to keep on until he "found" his son and he had to accept what he had become. He felt partly responsible, he had to hide so much from his wife, I am sure, so to spare her the pain. When Penning said so matter of factly that he stabbed Michael, you knew that they all were changed by what they had seen and done. It was so powerful the way he just said it..."I stabbed him." As we sat on a bench we struck up a conversation with a 24 year old man who had recently gotten home and discharged from the Army. We asked him lots of questions and he was quite forthright. He is now estranged from his family because when he came home he couldn't relate right away and they just didn't understand what he had been through. He does not think we had the right to go in to a "sovereign country" and take down their ruler. He said we don't see reality here. Some areas they hate us and you speed through for your own safety. I am so happy that he is alive, but he has a lot of healing to do. I think Jones acting was superb and the music haunting. I won't forget this movie.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. Enrique
    Sep 25, 2007
    10
    Close to perfection. Extremely moving and thought provoking. One of the best movie so far this year.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. [Anonymous]
    Sep 25, 2007
    9
    An extremely well-done and sensitive portrayal of what happens to good men when confronted with the horrors of mankind...unflinching in its honesty with a powerful performance by Tommy Lee Jones.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. JanetA.
    Sep 25, 2007
    9
    Disturbing, haunting story about what the war in Iraq is doing to our soldiers. Considered as a movie, it is excellent, good acting, more and more information is revealed as the story goes along.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. EricC.
    Oct 3, 2007
    1
    When I hear someone describe this as haunting or disturbing, I nearly lose it. Paul Haggis made a movie called Crash that the mainstream hailed as brave because it took on race issues. Any one with decent sense realized that this was offensive, not because of what it was about, but because this hack thought it was his place to "enlighten" the rest of us scum bags, because he's clearly got morals we can't comprehend. Also, it was a horribly directed movie. Now he does it again with this crap. People will call him brave again, people will say this is the movie we all needed. I'll say he just made a 70s war movie and changed the war. That once again, he sees in himself the hero who needs to stand up on a hill and usher us forth to salvation. I'll walk the other way. If you want to follow this pompous idiot, go ahead. I hate this war we're in, and I hate how our soldiers are dispensable pawns for our ridiculous president. But this isn't the guy we want to express our anger. He's the last guy that should take on our problems, let alone be given a camera.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. JakeK.
    Oct 9, 2007
    9
    It's refreshing to finally see a movie willing to truthfully and poignantly examine the divide between the soldiers fighting in Iraq and the people they come home to. Paul Haggis manages to tell a devastating story without resorting to sentimentality or sensationalism. "In the Valley of Elah" is must-see viewing for anyone still picturing this war from a black-and-white moral perspective. Tommy Lee Jones puts in a perfect restrained performance, framed beautifully by Roger Deakins' equally understated photography. I should note that I almost skipped this one because I disliked "Crash" for being so overbearing.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  30. DavidZ.
    Oct 10, 2007
    9
    A very good movie. I hated the very last scene but the acting was terrific and the story compelling. Well worth a visit.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. DWilly
    Oct 14, 2007
    7
    A very nice film, hurt badly by virtually all the young men playing soldiers who flatten what would have been a tough ending to pull off in any case with performances that are oddly weak, I say oddly because everyone else, including one line parts, is so damn good (Jones solid as always and Charlize Theron continuously in there hitting). I think I know what Haggis wanted to say, but if you want to say it you can't do it by staying at arms length.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
prev next
Page:
  • 1

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
65 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 37 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 27 out of 37
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 37
  3. Negative: 0 out of 37
  1. Salon.com
    Reviewed by: Stephanie Zacharek
    40
    The movie chickens out. In the Valley of Elah could have been really interesting -- and really daring -- if it had focused on Hank's realization that his own child, supposedly a good kid, had perhaps committed the kinds of atrocities that would make any decent human being recoil. The movie (which Haggis also wrote) dances around that territory, but doesn't dare to march straight into its terrifying maw.
    Read full review
  2. The New Yorker
    Reviewed by: David Denby
    80
    No one could mistake the movie for a documentary, but the picture has some of the rectitude of a good documentary--a tone of plainness without flatness.
    Read full review
  3. Time
    Reviewed by: Richard Schickel
    80
    This is a sad, subtle and very good movie, designed not so much to make you think, but to make you feel the impact of large events on little lives.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »