Though certainly Lee's most mainstream film to date, Inside Man is much more political than most critics are giving it credit for. Ultimately, Lee reveals detective and bank robber as dual protagonists, fighting corporate and government systems that reward corruption, injustice, and opportunism at every step. Between this, V for Vendetta, and Dave Chappelle's Block Party, I';m feeling revolutionary. Down with the white majority!… Expand

Thought it was great!

Clever and entertaining. It seems as Mr. Lee wanted to show the world he could make a good "normal" film and he did it.

A movie where the whole didn't add up to the sum of its parts. Solid if not spectacular performances by Denzel, Jodie and Clive, decent enough pacing, but there was something missing. The story was VERY anticlimactic...the twist with Christopher Plummer was revealed very early, and movies like this are more effective when they end with a bang than a whimper. It was so-so...I wouldn't recommend it.… Expand

The writer and producer think they are so clever, but the basic plot is ridiculous. Spike Lee makes it interesting with various directing techniques. The last 15 mnutes is a big letdown. Lucky Sleven does this type of movie much better.

One of the best caper flicks in years. Only The Score comes to mind among recent ones as being anywhere near as good.

No it's not perfect, but it sure is entertaining. And thats all that counts isn't it?

This is just great. An entertaining heist movie with (thanks to being directed by Spike Lee) a social conscience. The best bits being the portrayals of everyday predjudice and the dangers inherent in a generation growing up playing 'harmless' videogames.

Go with the critics on this one. Excellent movie! Spike Lee is consumate film maker. He pays attention to the details. Easy to understand why artists perform for him. I compare this one to Usual Suspects which Roger Ebert gave a 38 rating in 1995.

Taut, compelling thriller; it kept me on the edge ot my seat and wanting more throughout. This is the best movie I have seen this year. Nonetheless the movie had a few weaknesses: the characters lacked depth and I found the ending a little weak, but these are really nitpicks. An excellent movie. Strongly recommended.

This is truly one of the worst films I've ever seen. On several occasions, this mess was nothing more than thinly veiled racial jabs masquerading as a crime thriller that goes nowhere. We see Spike's usual M.O. on display throughout the film, which basically amounts to making caucasians feel guilty about...well being caucasians. Spike Lee was in way over his head on this one. Case in point...Lee is the only dolt transparent enough to cast Jodie Foster as a manipulative power broker (who's white of course since white=manipulative in Spike Lee joints) then proceed to name the character Ms. White. Even the overt racial sarcasm falls flat as his breathless pursuit of half cocked social commentary drags this sophomoric production down to the abyss of most forgettable films of all time.… Expand

This film can be summarized in five words: "All flash and no substance." The lead actors deliver solid performances (as you would expect from the likes of Denzel Washington, Jodie Foster, and Christopher Plummer) but are unfortunately expected to carry a largely incomprehensible story where the plot is vague and convoluted and the motivations of the characters are poorly defined. Top it all off with a resolution that leaves more questions than answers and you have a film that is hard to recommend. To Spike Lee's credit, he can be confident and inventive director, but he still goes for "film student gimmickry" when the film would have been better served with more restraint and a tighter focus on the narrative. "Inside Man" is entertaining enough as a popcorn flick, but there are better films more deserving of your time.… Expand

Very slick indeed, all actors are playing to strengths here and it shows. Great dialogue brings alive a tried formula.

If the ending were as good as the rest of the movie I would have given it a 10. Most of the way through the movie was great... good plot, good acting... then it ends, and leaves you feeling "what happened." Four of us went together and none of us could figure out what happened at the end. Very frustrating!

Entertaining and compelling to the end. Not a flawless film but a fun and engaging ride.

Judging by the reviews on this site I was anticipating a good movie but I was dissapointed. It had its moments and had the right idea but went wrong in a lot of area's. Overall it was incredibley cheesey. But I expected that as soon as I saw the opening credits and was reminded that it was A SPIKE LEE JOINT.

Pretty terrible, really. The masterful Denzel, even more so than with "Man On Fire," is swimming upstream here and Clive Owen better think of a way to add some vulnerability to his hardass act soon because it's wearing thin. There is some really painful dialog as our heros dissassociate from the grave danger threatoning fifty human lives, and, while Spike himself doesn't appear, there is scene after scene featuring talentless people demonstrating his acting technique of very nearly winking directly into the camera.… Expand

Thought it was very well done. Excellent acting by Washington and Owen. Lots of action and a good story line. Great movie. Got to be good with Denzel Washington playing the lead. Excellent.

I generally do not like Lee's movies, but this is an exception. The story keeps you on your feet and although I generally do not like Washington he was pretty good in this one. I only see about two or three movies a year and I'm happy this is one I did see.

This movie is a must-see movie. It's not the best movie in the world for sure, or even close to that, but it's a movie everyone should see in the big screen.

It resembles "The Usual Suspects" in many ways, although the cast definitely has more star power. My expectations were met; I was entertained, I was surprised, and I laughed. This is the one and only Spike Lee film I've ever liked.

I am a big fan of Spike Lee, and think a lot of his other moveies have been very underrated. So I saw this with high expectations and was quite disappointed. The movie has little suspense, the plot is unbelievable, and some of the minor characters are so stereotypical, they are both unbelievable and distracting. The only really great performance in the movie was by Clive Owen, who is mesmerizing. The other main actors (Denzel Washington, Jodie Foster) are good, but have been better in other movies.… Expand

Beautiful.

This is the PERFECT genre movie and has been completely underrated by almost everyone. I expected very little from this other than a competent heist movie and was completely overwhelmed by both the cleverness of the action and pacing, the way that Spike Lee played with your expectations, and the taught character interplay. Everything about it was an unexpected pleasure. The only movies that this can really be compared to are the great French thrillers like Rififi or Les Diaboliques, which were made (like this) by great directors who fully respected the conventions and limitations of the genres they are working inside.… Expand

100% Satisfaction guaranteed! Highly recommended! Spike lee's best for years.

I'm surprised at the number of negative comments posted on this movie. Although not perfect, this movie is certainly entertaining and is better put together than most junk you see on the screen these days.

Here we have the second worst film I have ever seen. This DVD should come with a packet of "eye bleach". Boorish from it's inception, this film quietly reminds you why Hollywood is dead. I gave it a "one" because Ms. Foster's knees look like tadpoles in the gullet of a large pelican.

I enjoyed watching this movie. A very surprising thriller.

A silly and limp "thriller" by an otherwise intelligent director. There were laughs in all the wrong places.

Filmmaker Spike Lee's first foray into big-studio genre movies, Inside Man is a twisty thriller that makes up for its flaws with star power and sharp observations about post-2001 New York. It's about the volatile showdown between a determined cop and a perfectionist bank robber is sent spiraling toward disaster when a scheming power broker steps in to take control of the situation in this hair-raising heist flick directed by Spike Lee and starring Denzel Washington, Clive Owen, and Jodie Foster. Dalton Russell (Owen) is a bank robber with a difference. In his quest to execute the perfect heist, Dalton has taken every possible factor into consideration. Dalton's uncanny ability of staying one step ahead of the law thwarts even-tempered Detective Keith Frazier's (Washington) best efforts. But there's another factor at play. The bank president (Christopher Plummer) has requested the services of high-profile negotiator Madeline White (Foster). Despite her commendable track record, Madeline is something of a wild card, and before the day is over, this bank robbery will go down in history as one of the most elaborate heists ever executed. Inside Man's plot is exciting, and the acting by Washington, Owen, and Foster all have a stellar performance of their own. I couldn't have liked it more.… Collapse

"Inside Man' is at its best when Jodie Fisher, Clive Owen and Christopher Plummer are on screen.; theirs is acting on a consistently high level. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for Denzel Washington who is often too mannered; this is not his finest hour.

This movie has all the trappings a heist movie ought to have, engaging plot, solid and diverse cast, slick direction, decent score. all works and looks great together.

Implausible yet oddly entertaining, a testament to the fine job of the cast and director I suppose. Given the way the plot (finally) plays out, it's quite ironic that the "getaway car" is a Volkswagen.

Wow.. This movie was spectacular.. I really enjoyed it. The theatre I was in unfortunately had a fire alarm when it got to the part where Clive Owen walked out of the bank just like he said. And words cannot describe how bad I want to see what was going to happen after that.. Once again.. fantastic movie.

A fantastic film! I'll be seeing this one again and buying the DVD when it comes out!

If you pay really close attention to small details, there are no surprises as you stay ahead of the game. It's a matter of being able to sort through some of the post-modern elements. Nevertheless, Inside Man is a great story and worth seeing.

A thoroughly satisfying movie. Compelling from start to finish. (For those who didn't understand the ending, you must not have been paying attention. My wife and I both knew exactly what happened.) Acting is superb, down to the smaller parts, pacing is perfect, and dialogue is original. So far, the best movie I've seen this year.

I was left feeling bored and unamused. After all the positive reviews I have heard (critics and users alike) I was really expecting a fresh and exciting film, but was disappointed. Washington plays his typical tough-guy under duress role, and Foster fails to inspire like she has so often in the past. There is nothing new in Spike Lee's exploration of racial tensions and corruption of power in this weak, slow-moving, and watered down "suspens/thriller." Save your money.… Expand

It has some flaws, but overall I thought it was pretty good. I loved the loud talking, well bosomed lady. Maybe the success of this movie will give Spike the clout to film a project that is close to his heart.

First 2/3red of the movie was very well done but the last 1/3rd was a big disappointment. What in the world were they thinking casting Jodie Foster in this role. Viewers did not needed to be fed the story with a spoon. Not one of Spike's best. The social commentary was lost in the messy plot and sub plots. Clive Owen is terrific!

After the garbage I have seen for the better part of a year and a half this was an entertaining film as it kept you on your toes. Denzel Washington was out performed by Clive Owen. Jodie Foster was unnecessary and added little to the film. The star of the movie was the NY ethnicticty which shined through but only New Yorkers would understand New Yorkers. The ending was a bit of a disappointment as it never explained how Clive learned what was in the box? Still all in all kudo's to Spike Lee, who for once, made a commerical film demonstrating his directing talents without need of using the race card.… Expand

A good film with the best thing being the acting from the leads (especially Foster) but Lee's inserts only subtract from the film, a fun film.

Very good film, nice ensemble cast and good storytelling.

No one can deny that this movie has a great cast. The acting is terrific. The directing is classic Spike Lee--brilliant at times, but he takes every chance to work in commentary about race, religion and ethnicity. All in all, this movie presents a good picture and the plot depicts what would be a brilliant heist if it were true. However, there are serious flaws in the plot (which are gracefully glossed over by expert acting), but the end result is that we really don't know the various character's motivations for their behavior. At one point we are told by one of the theives "I did it for the money", but that doesn't seem to add up with what was taken. Similarly I'm still trying to figure out exactly what motivated Denzel to bring Jodie a telephone number in one of the last scenes. The sequence of the movie is expertly executed to both provide hints and keep you guessing. Denzel's character is likeable, funny and feels real. Jodie Foster's character is a bit unbelievable in terms of profession. Oh, and keep an eye out for the Albanian woman. I thought she was excellent.… Expand

This is hack work. I was a fan of Lee's even when the buzz around him died. And I love all the major actors in this movie. But I thought it was one of the clumsiest movies I've seen in a long time. No energy, momentum, style. The script was anemic and corny. I'm not sure how this film was supposed to translate. As suspense it failed because it telegraphs everything in advance. It has a distracting sublot with a nazi sympathizer that is based on an ubelievable premise. It also has too many A-list actors like Jodie Foster and Christopher Plummer doing small parts that are little to work with and that is something I always find distracting. I'm not trying to be a hater, but I really disliked this movie and am taking the time to write this because I disliked it so much.… Expand

This movie was very well done. The story was intriguing, the acting was great, and there were enough plot twists to keep you guessing. This is definetly a thinking man's movie. Excellent use of the cameras and pacing. This being my first Spike Lee movie (I was too young to see most of them), I will most definitely check out his back catalog. A great movie overall.

different take on a heist flick. pretty original, and very clever.

Due to the generally positive response to this film, I asumed I would like it. Wrong!!! Sorely lacking in style, this potboiler is all over the place! The writing of Denzel Washington's character is often ridiculous; and he works valiently to overcome it. The only real entertainment value for me were the unintential (I assume) moments of camp; notably, the telephone scene between Denzel and his girlfriend; and the bizarre performance from Jodie Foster, who seems to be trying to channel Ann Coulter! Foster's attempts at being cool and cunning come off as simply laughable. I'm not sure how Christopher Plummer kept a straight face in his scenes with her. For me, only Foster's performance fiasco made this film worth my viewing time. And why was Willem Dafoe's participation needed here? I used to believe Spike was good film director, but a poor screenwriter. After seeing "Inside Man." I now have my doubts about his skills as a director. I think most of the "names" signed on for the money.… Expand

Excellent suspense film. Loved the way the robbery went down. Nothing is what it seems, eh? I was thinking "now who's going to have the last laugh". The movie clearly answered that.

I rarely see a Spike Lee Joint and end up liking it. Until now. The first lines of this film belong in the most memorable list. Clive Owen steal the screen from Denzel Washington when the 2 are together on screen. Do Not misunderstand me. Denzel Washington Is a fantastic actor. One of my favorites. But Clive Just Rocks. This one of those rare flicks that combine everything from action to comedy to thriller and works. The part when Jodie Foster is called the "C" Word is just classic. If some did not say it i would have. When I said I Have rarely seen a Spike Lee Joint And LIked it. I meant it. "Clockers" "Malcom X" And Now "Inside Man" So Far this one is my fave.… Expand

it's more of a 9.3. but i gave it a 9 just because it wasn't totaly perfect. but it was amazing nonetheless! i was so entertained it wasn't even funny. but it kinda of was for some reason. :-] anyways, go see it! def. worth a gander.

A very entertaining "think thriller" thats a little easy in the "think" department. Spike Lee sells out and makes a big studio Movie For The Masses with a big ticket cast so now he can finance his next two joints without the suits telling him what they want!!

Solid acting by all (I've seen better by Denzel but still good). Unpredictable twists somehat in the vein of Usual Suspects. Very good movie overall.

Absolutely overrated. Based on 2005 film reviews and the review of this movie, it is clear to me that most movie reviewers are shills for the film industry, "rooting" for certain films to do well. Great cast, but bad acting, especially Jodie Foster, who had a smirk on her face the entire movie, and I had no idea why. The plot builds for us to see the "twist," and when it's revealed, it's nothing special at all.… Expand

Smart and gripping, one of the best movies so far this year!

Film drags too often, and there is definite fat here that could have been cut out. One of the prroblems with Spike Lee is that in the last few years he's allowed himself to become too self-indulgence, in exchange for discipline.

you think the movie is clever, but its not, there's way better movie out there than is one, and please, don't take your girlfriend to a movie like this one.

I thought it was one of the best heist movies Ive seen in a while, it kept me wondering all the way up until the end!

The worst thing about Inside Man is not that it is such a terrible film, (which it is) but that it received such good reviews. What's the deal? Are the critics just so used to lousy movies that they give a bomb like this good marks? This is a really bad script, poorly acted (what is up with Jodie Foster?-i've seen better acting at my kid's school play), and poorly directed by Spike Lee-who hasen't made a good film since-maybe never. Boring, stupid and a waste of time!… Expand

Great movie, Denzel my favorite actor, looking forward for his next movie.

An interesting plot, good acting and character development all fall apart in the last 30 minutes. An utterly unbelievable and inconclusive ending makes this a disappointment.

Spike Lee, one of my all-time favorite movie directors, notably for his work in the critically acclaimed, "Do the Right Thing", surprisingly changes his style of direction with "Inside Man", a cop based thriller about a bank robbery done by a brilliant thief. Unlike Lee's previous dramas, "Inside Man" works, even as an action flick, which is a genre that he's never taken before. Like a "Spike fan" may suspect, he still keeps that racy energetic tone, and also keeps his film-making old fashioned. Overall, the shots look great, you'll find some sizzling action, plenty of tense sequencing, and a lot of great dialogue. But the aspect that makes "Inside Man" a true winner, is the work of the ensemble cast, done by Oscar winning-nominated actors Denzle Washington , Jodie Foster, and Clive Owen. They are all terrific here. The movie does have it's shortcomings though, like the awful music and the corn-ball intro. One thing that I also found unappealing was the pull-off : a conclusion too Denzle's line, "Come on this aint' no bank robbery!", that you've probably seen in commercials or trailers. It seemed way too convoluted for such a well-made movie that was perfectly executed for the first 100 minutes. Although it somewhat disappointed me to some extent knowing it could have been a Grade A thriller, "Inside Man" is nevertheless great, classy entertainment, and it stays with you.… Expand

The "snappy banter" as one critic put it, fell flat with me---it was ok at first, but it got stale real quick. the story started off good as well, but became transparent and a total let down by about midway through. the direction was pretty good, the actors were pretty good---so I guess it was the writing and the story that were just medicore at best. I'm glad I waited for it on DVD.

Of all the films of 2006, the largely favorable critical reception of this one is truly the most baffling. It actually manged to make at least one film critic's 10 Best List!!!! Slick? Yes. Good? Absolutely not! The only reason I give this film "1" point is for the highly-entertaining, unintentionally laughable performance by Jodie Foster -- she's so awful in her seething intensity, that she's wonderful! Foster's megacorporate red-herring heavy-breathing was the only aspect of the film that kept me interested -- just to see what she would do next... The whole enterprise is slick garbage! I'm sure they all enjoyed cashing their checks when the project was finished.… Expand

Solid, witty, but perhaps lacking a punch at the end of the film. Casting and dialogue great. You won't be disappointed too much, but no Usual Suspects.

Whatever you do, enjoy the movie as it's given to you. Don't hold out for a spectacular ending. Revel in the smallest details. I think this is one of Lee's best directing jobs. And Jodie Foster is excellent. Denzel? Oh yeah.

I thoroughly enjoyed this film. There are so many small details you need to pay attention to but the end worth wating for. Acting superb and directing outstanding. Don't miss it!

Best film I've seen so far this year! All actors play Oscar worthy performance, storyline is very slick. Spike Lee impresses me!

Crisp and smart, with a wry sense of humor. A clever heist with a great multi-layered plot. Great acting, though Jody Foster was a bit unconvincing in her role as super fixer. Loved Denzel and Clive, and all the many character actors. Superb soundtrack too!

This movie is an insult to intelligent movie making in every imaginable sense. The story is flat out lame, with the super "surprise" ending being nothing more than a tired joke. Now it seems that everyone from critics to casual movie goers have been willing to excuse this movie solely based on the great cast. Which would have been understandable, had the acting itself not been the greatest weakness of this pretentious mess. Washington gives one of the worst performances of his career here, playing a sarcastic know-it-all cop who is annoyingly juvenile and devoid of any compelling thoughts or emotions.i.e., he and his partner stare at a female victim's large chest while interogating her, making light of her emotions. (this is supposed to be funny) Foster is also terrible playing a mysterious liason with her own agenda. Dafoe is miscast as a clueless police captain. Owen is the only exception here, suffering through an under-developed role. The movie is ruined by random attempts at comedy, both intentional and unintentional, which ruins any suspense or tension that might have helped it. THE BOTTOM LINE: A pretentious hollywood film that trys to pass itself off as an updated Dog Day Afternoon, but instead feels more like a failed comedy with an A-list cast.… Expand

The best part of this movie is the trailer you see on tv.. looks great.. till you get there and the two hours of your life is over. Boring not enough action.. Jody Foster has lost her acting abilities. I wanted to not the fack smile off her face.. But i dont hit woman.

I was expecting something spectacular from the reviews, but the movie was a letdown. Denzel was good and Clive was good, but the movie just did not seem suspenseful. There are many weaknesses with the theft. The movie did seem to drag down and Jodie F's role was not needed and not inspiring. The movie is better than most from the acting, but that is not saying much due to today's movie crapola. You would be better off to see the Thomas Crown Affair (old one and remake) and avoid this one.… Expand

I agree that the best part of this movie is the trailer on TV. Unnecessary social commentary inserted into useless waste of time scenes (at one point, denzel instructs a low level patrolman not to use ethnic slurs and the bank robber owen tries to steer a child away from playing a violent video game, lame for a supposed heist movie) jodie foster's character was useless and the acting belonged in "mean girls". If you're looking for a plot with standard rising action/climax/falling action don't expect any from this film. Yes I understand the ending but that doesn't mean that it was clever or interesting. Over half of the theater waited throughout the entire ending credits with a desperate hope that they would eventually get there money's worth and a portion of the plot would be seen to completion. no such luck. Loose ends are everywhere from the role of clive owen's fellow bank robbers to how the robbers got all of their information to how they were at all connected to Case. Although Denzel's observation that "this ain't no bank robbery" is correct, I was disappointed with the "deep" and "complex" conspiracy that for some reason involved the mayor of new york, although his character seemed unaware of even his own role halfway through the movie… Expand

I give this movie an 8 because it was well planned out. The actors did a ver good job acting in this movie i enjoyed it very much and the whole movie had me guessing what was going to happen next.

People you are rating this movie low are the problem with the average movie going public these days. Throw a few explosions at them, and some wacked out main character that solves his problems with fists and they rate it a ten. And you get extra points for CGI it seems. This movie was great! It reminds me of some of the old detective fictions that were made in the 30's and 40's like the Maltese Falcon, and then later on in the 70's Chinatown. No, Denzel didn't use a gun and blow stuff up ever chance he got, but he was intelligent and methodical in solving the case. This movie moved us through the 3 stages of a detective fiction very fluidly. It also managed to do it in a modern context. While using all the new tricks of film and the technology that we have developed, the film still adhereing to the classic detective fiction motiff. The filming was excellent, and the director managed to get tons of great shots in that helped to set the tone for the movie. The closeups on the characters, the rackish angles that cause uneasiness, and the double focuses helped to present us with a story and feeling that is really unsurpassed by just about anything that has come out this year. AND BEST OF ALL IT IS AN ORIGINAL MOVIE, NOT A SEQUAL, A COMIC BOOK, OR A REDO! Thank you Spike Lee for doing something real and different!… Expand

I found this movie highly entertaining. Yes the plot is implausible at times but the three main leads kept my attention. I enjoyed the dialogue, action shots and the overall theme.

Entertaining but a little self-satisfied, Lee's film has moments of great energy and tension interspersed with scenes that seem interminable. And what's with that old chestnut, the Nazi war criminal? Can't anyone count any more? The Christopher Plummer character would have to be in his 90s if the film's "explanations" had any roots in reality. Find some other reasons why movie characters can be odious and evil, WW ended over 60 years ago!… Expand

This is Spike Lee's best and puts him in the same league as directors like Hitchcock. The photography, tricks and straight, direction, and the unfolding story kept me rapt and on the edge of my seat the whole time. Denzil's character was a bit too self-righteous, but that's ok as the leading character. Jody Foster's performance was enigmatically appropriate, one of her most complex and interesting since she played the single mom in Little Man Tate. She told great stories with small gestures. Kept me guessing until the end and was a lot of fun. (Loved the lady who solved her unpaid ticket problems using a little Albanian.)… Expand

Honestly? I was somewhat disappointed. Jody Foster's role was kind of dumb.

This movie is just okay. Better than many, but at no point does it approach true excellence. It is certainly better than the dreck that Spike Lee has put out too often in his career (what happened to the energetic genius of Do the Right Thing?). I strongly agree with Ebert's review.

When i saw the commericals i thought it looked stupid but once i actually saw it, i really liked it tho it did confuse me a bit.

Thoroughly entertaining. Spike Lee has a very subtle but pervasive sense of humor. Engrossing. A lot to like about this movie and i can find no fault with it at all.

Lee, for one, is long beyond his days as a civic provocateur and voice for the radical social world. Like John Singleton, he may have found his legs as a pulp manufacturer whose least arguable claim to fame is that he can do fast, funny, attitudinal genre films better than Tony Scott. Washington and Foster, for their parts, are merely dukes in a sick kingdom, taking what roles they're offered for people their age (and sex) just to keep their careers afloat in the public brain-pan. Lee is playing the genre like a board game, and his film is a sniggering riff, filled with hyperbolic New York stereotypes, sexist jokes, puns, scattershot commentary on racial profiling and smug banter. As bogus in its way as Richard Donner's 16 Blocks, Inside Man has an even more irritating disrespect for the verities of police work and for the emotional life of urban Americans. There are a few rousing achievements on the table, in particular a comical police debate--instigated by a faux riddle tossed by Owen, about trains, U.S. currency and Grand Central Station--as well as a fast joke involving a Sikh hostage who, outraged by profiling, acknowledges that yes, he can easily hail a cab in Mid-Eastern-cabbie-saturated New York. But heist films are hardly what they used to be; for decades, they were a vehicle for postwar desperation and fatalism, and today the genre has an empty tank of frisson to offer without film noir's acknowledgment of doom. The difference between, say, Stanley Kubrick's 1956 masterpiece The Killing and contemporary daydreams like Inside Man is the difference between a luckless hell on earth and a dull weekend in the Poconos.… Expand

'Inside Man' never really tries for greatness, and that's fine by me. An excellent premise (the robbery) is somewhat tempered by so-so dialogue (though there are a few exceptions-I think others have pointed them out). The witness interviews were drawn out and a bit unnecessary. And of course there was the standard racial commentary one can expect from Spike Lee. But in the end, this movie delivers where it counts: as a suspenseful, tense thriller with an electrifying performance by Clive Owen as the robber.… Expand

Acting -- great, as would be expected. The film doesn't work though: All the twists are revealed or amply clear by about the mid-point, so the thing just sort of stops, but doesn't have an ending. Secondly, Clive Owen steals the papers to bribe Christopher Plummer later, right? But then why leave the ring and send Denzel to investigate Plummer? The result of that will be that Plummer's past crimes will be exposed in which case the papers Clive stole become valueless. Right?… Expand

Too much Characters are introduced and ignored in the movie, but nevertheless "Inside Man" is a powerful heist movie full of ready-tension.