Metascore
30 out of 100

Generally unfavorable - based on 33 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 33
  2. Negative: 14 out of 33
  1. An all-stops-out rabble-rouser that hurls a broadside at America's medical insurance crisis.
  2. 67
    It's hard to imagine how anyone could remain dry-eyed while watching the scene in which John Q. tries to cram in a lifetime of fatherhood advice in a goodbye speech to his son.
  3. This is an A-list cast toiling on a C-list screenplay.
  4. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    63
    One can excuse the movie's missteps and melodramatic moments in the greater interest of the strong statement it makes about our health care system.
  5. 50
    Waste in the health care system is deplorable, but waste on the movie screen isn't so great either.
  6. It's as forgettable as they come.
  7. It's not honest, and it's certainly no solution.
  8. Not a movie but a live-action agitprop cartoon so shameless and coarse, it's almost funny.
  9. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    50
    A well-intentioned but self-defeatingly manipulative film that amounts to an impassioned commercial for national health care.
  10. 50
    Turns out to be hopelessly mediocre -- a poorly scripted, preachy fable that forgets about unfolding a coherent, believable story in its zeal to spread propaganda.
  11. Like a tone-deaf singer at a benefit concert, John Q. is a bad movie appearing on behalf of a good cause.
  12. 50
    With its simplistic, didactic approach, the presence of a top-flight ensemble is the only thing separating John Q from your average TV movie of the week.
  13. The movie could have used a brain transplant. It doesn't explore injustice -- it just exploits it.
  14. Washington's fire and righteous anger can only do so much, and the token grit amounts to a few grains of sand in the sentimental machinery.
  15. Reviewed by: David Edelstein
    50
    Denzel Washington is so powerfully earnest an actor that you never want to laugh at him -- even when you ought to be in stitches.
  16. Gripping, if manipulative and somewhat preposterous, drama.
  17. 40
    The movie's tone and plot twists are so ludicrously overwrought that even Washington's admirably restrained performance -- can't rescue it from its own excesses.
  18. 40
    A coercive script by James Kearns, and some middling direction by Nick Cassavetes, can't rob the movie of an undeniable, headlong crowd-pleasing power.
  19. 38
    The kind of movie Mad magazine prays for. It is so earnest, so overwrought and so wildly implausible that it begs to be parodied.
  20. 38
    The movie goes awry from the opening shots.
  21. 30
    Plays less like an exposé than a piece of exploitation, its clear divide between good and evil allowing no breathing room for real drama.
  22. 30
    Falls below even minimal standards of dramatic decency. John Q is a trashy, opportunistic piece of pop demagoguery. [4 Mar 2002, p. 90]
  23. 25
    Washington can't save a picture that spends so much time worrying about a heart that it loses its head.
  24. Reviewed by: Ed Park
    20
    Washington is in default dignified mode here. He capably embodies the hero's transformation from doughy dad to man of action, amid the movie's shameless button-pushing and cheap religious overlay.
  25. 20
    So lacking in shame that it finally seems laughable.
  26. Reviewed by: Todd McCarthy
    20
    A shamelessly manipulative commercial on behalf of national health insurance.
  27. This movie, written in crayon by James Kearns, is too dumb to come up with a way of defeating the system by using its own rules.
  28. 20
    When emotion is called for, Cassavetes drags out every tear-jerking moment beyond the point of tolerability.
  29. 10
    Leaves you feeling as if you've been alternately milked and bitch-slapped. Its manipulation is so clumsy and obvious -- and, ultimately, it goes so far astray from its original guiding principles -- that it leaves you feeling dangled and dazed.
  30. Is it possible none of these actors read the script before they signed on? Were New Line executives perhaps too hung up on hobbits to notice how whacked out this movie is?
  31. 10
    John Q. is as fake as that tear, an exploitative mess trying to pass as social activism.
  32. Every so often a movie transcends stupidity and soars into the empyrean of true idiocy. John Q. is such a movie.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 73 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 39 out of 51
  2. Negative: 7 out of 51
  1. Critics got this film so wrong, They really did. An interesting plot, Satisfying acting by the cast, and an emotional connection that you feel through out the film makes this definently worth the watch. While it may not be perfect, Its a lot better then the critics say it is. Full Review »
  2. I thought it was a good film. It does take a little to get into and its a little boring at first but in the end its well worth it. I really enjoyed it and I think many others would as well. Full Review »
  3. "oh dad, im a cute little boy who loves my family and now im sick, please feel sorry for me and make the doctors fix me" - "We dont have enough money son because I have a crappy job and the man is out to ruin our lives" blah blah Full Review »