- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
38Seeing her (Kidman) in junk like this is a bit like watching the Queen of England eat a Taco Bell chalupa.
-
25The people in this movie are dumber than a box of Tinkertoys.
-
25Offers only one point of interest beyond the breasts of its second female lead: Aniston's barely disguised disdain for her material.
-
25A bummer - slack rather than loose, tired rather than fun.
-
12You know you're in trouble when you're suffering a comedy shutout and the pinch-hitters you send in are Kidman and Dave Matthews.
-
10The shame of it is, all this ridiculousness might have worked under surer hands. After all, farces are supposed to be a little silly, and the audience, for lack of a better phrase, can be trained to just go with it. The trick? Don't treat us like a bunch of Palmers.
-
38It's a rarely amusing movie overwhelmed by grating kids, unfunny sidekicks, half-hearted Sandler funny voices and a co-star who seems more fearful of smiling with each passing year.
-
38Akin to watching a bad sit-com that never ends.
-
25It's the perfect Valentine's date night movie, but only with someone you hate.
-
30An Adam Sandler comedy, which means it bears only a superficial relationship to the customary conventions of moviemaking, and also that there's no use getting all worked up about that.
-
0A comedy so noxious it seems the product of deliberate malignity. Surely the sour, vapid, miserable world of this movie can't reflect any real human being's notion of what love or humor or good storytelling is-not even a Hollywood screenwriter's.
-
25Aniston and Sandler, however, play characters too awful to deserve anyone better than each other. But what did we do to deserve them?
-
25An egregiously unfunny enterprise.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 48 out of 69
-
Mixed: 4 out of 69
-
Negative: 17 out of 69
-
10
-
10This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view.