- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: Dec 21, 2001
User Score
6.6
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 17 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 12 out of 17
-
Mixed: 2 out of 17
-
Negative: 3 out of 17
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
ChristiH.Jan 11, 20024Good cast but extremely unrealistic plot.
-
-
JtT.Jan 3, 200210I thought this was a sensational movie. Hugh Jackman was a nonstop romancer. Meg Ryan was very outgoing in this movie.
-
-
LisaG.Jul 20, 20028As unrealistic as this film is, it's unbelievably sweet. I must admit that I adore Meg Ryan!!! She's just so elegant in this movie!!! Go out and see it...you won't be wasting your time!
-
-
ChadS.Jan 3, 20027After seeing "Someone Like You" last year, I thought of Meg Ryan. In a romantic comedy, you have to make the audience like you. This is no small feat. So what if she plays variations of the same hopeless romantic character. She's good at it. And she's probably a nice person too. Look at how Hugh Jackman is allowed to shine in scenes when she's off-camera.
-
-
SeliniC.Jun 22, 20027"Kate and Leopold" is a charming romantic comedy. It is one of the few current movies with the heart and soul of a classic film. However, at times it can be a little repetitive. Definately a chick-flick.
-
-
JackD.Jul 31, 20022Silly me..I misread the title and thought it was a movie about dancing called Kate & Leotard..I dont know what was worse..the script or Meg Ryan's hairdo. They took a decent idea and made a mess of it. I disliked the movie so much I wanted to transport myself back in time to prevent myself from watching it...
-
-
Apr 5, 20127
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
30It just isn't a Meg Ryan movie unless she's got male.
-
50Has only the most tangential relation to reality, and therein lies its slender charm.
-
42Progressively sabotaged by poor technical quality, terrible plotting, a glaring lack of directorial skill and finesse, scenes that have no credibility and/or motivation and an astounding sloppiness to its historical detail.