- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: Jan 25, 2002
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
75Silly, perfect fun.
-
50Consistently silly and intermittently laugh-out-loud funny spoof.
-
40On the up side, there are some genuinely funny jokes, and Oedekerk has been wise enough to keep the running time down to 82 minutes, including the eight-minute closing credit sequence (which is worth staying through its entirety). But Kung Pow! is no "What's Up, Tiger Lily?"
-
25If you've gone to Kung Pow for the plot, you have made a mistake. Come to think of it, if you have gone for the comedy, you've also made a mistake. In fact, if you've gone at all, you've made a mistake.
-
If ever there's been a martial-arts movie that makes you feel as if you've been kicked in the head, surely it's Kung Pow! Enter the Fist.
-
25Processed comedy chop suey.
-
20Obvious and, frankly, 25 years too late.
-
12An inept, tedious spoof of '70s kung fu pictures, it contains almost enough chuckles for a three-minute sketch, and no more.
-
10Like a slug that crawls across the screen for eighty minutes before dying of its own nausea.
-
10If, for whatever reason, you do find yourself watching it, you may begin to ponder one of life's larger dilemmas: the fact that something can be done does not necessarily mean it should be done.
-
10The result is hopelessly inane, humorless and under-inspired.
-
10To imagine the life of Harry Potter as a martial arts adventure told by a lobotomized Woody Allen is to have some idea of the fate that lies in store for moviegoers lured to the mediocrity that is Kung Pow: Enter the Fist.
-
0Where the hell are those Hollywood Ninja Assassins when you really need 'em?
-
0Does this even count as a movie?
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 239 out of 264
-
Mixed: 5 out of 264
-
Negative: 20 out of 264
-
ChrisC.10Best movie ever!
-
AndrewP.9
-
BettyP.10There is no movie out there like Kung Pow. Where the heck is the sequel?