- Studio: Columbia TriStar Home Video
- Release Date: Feb 2, 2001
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
66Hark! A Christian thriller about the Last Days that doesn't (totally) suck. That's got to be a sign of the times.
-
50With an appealing lead in Cameron, and a nicely brisk pace, there's a decent, midlevel Apocalypse movie here. But be aware that you will have to peel away several pages of the Bible to get to it.
-
50Might be extremely effective while preaching to the converted, but it's no great shakes as secular entertainment.
-
40This picture's b-movie values probably play better on video than in theaters.
-
40Seems perfectly timed to coincide with the ascension to office of George W. Bush. It's a clunky effort Bush could have written and directed.
-
38Piously acted, stiffly directed, and infused with a view of world politics that might charitably be described as delusional.
-
30For all its intimations of fire and brimstone, the film isn't remotely frightening, and the high-school-level acting doesn't help.
-
25A slow-moving, dirt-dull narrative crammed with clunky expository dialogue and obscure Biblical references.
-
20Watching Left Behind's plodding screen adaptation may make you feel the Deity has already abandoned us to a shockingly dull post-apocalypse.
-
10A blundering cringefest, thanks to unintentionally laughable dialogue, hackneyed writing and uninspired direction.
-
0It's well-shot and well-edited by Hollywood standards, though special effects don't reach the top Hollywood level. The stars have their hearts in their work: Cameron and Johnson don't have great depth but give their all. Currie makes a subtle villain.
-
0The loosely scripted story is further burdened with clunky dialogue and performances, shoddy continuity.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 17 out of 26
-
Mixed: 1 out of 26
-
Negative: 8 out of 26
-
Josh3
-
TonyM.0
-
HowardB.10Good Movie.